Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow unknown value data types for VALUE #674
Allow unknown value data types for VALUE #674
Changes from 1 commit
9e72aca
f7cef9c
1f22f4a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code used to be able to throw this exception if
$parameters['VALUE']
had an invalid value (did not end up matching to a class).Now, if
$parameters['VALUE']
is not valid, the code will end up doing:$class = $this->getClassNameForPropertyName($name);
That is, it will just ignore the invalid value, and use what has been passed in
$name
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am surprised that no unit test has failed. I guess that there is not a unit test that covers the (now deleted)
InvalidDataException
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. As far as I see this part of RFC5545, Section 3.2.20 (Value Data Type)
we need to allow to keep - but not interpret - VALUE information that we don't understand. That didn't work previously due to the Exception. That broke the whole process of interpretation.
The Exception has been introduced with c20acd7 about 8 years ago to have "A better error message for unsupported VALUE parameters." but even then there should have been no Exception as unsupported VALUE parameters IMO do not pose an error condition. They should not be interpreted, yes (what they are now), but not break the process but also be preserved for other tools to interpret that might be able to understand it.
That is the reason why the current process then falls back to the default value when "an invalid" - let's rephrase that to "a not recognized" - value is encountered.