Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

commit yaml #2183

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from
Open

commit yaml #2183

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

drazisil-codecov
Copy link
Collaborator

@drazisil-codecov drazisil-codecov commented Sep 30, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new component management entry for "Team 2" in the coverage configuration, enhancing team-specific tracking.
  • Documentation

    • Updated configuration details to include paths for the new component, ensuring clarity on coverage areas.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 30, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new component management entry for "Team 2" in the .github/codecov.yml file. This entry includes a new component ID (components_team2) and specifies three associated paths: packages/nps/**, packages/socket/**, and packages/shared/**. The configuration for "Team 1" remains unchanged, maintaining its existing paths and settings.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/codecov.yml Added new component for "Team 2" with ID components_team2 and paths for packages/nps/**, packages/socket/**, and packages/shared/**. Existing "Team 1" configuration remains unchanged.

Poem

In the garden of code, where teams do play,
A new path for Team 2 has come to stay.
With packages ready, they hop with glee,
Covering ground, as swift as can be!
So let’s cheer them on, in this coding spree! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits c667bda..6678842. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource JavaScript LogoJavaScript✅ SuccessView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 26.55%. Comparing base (c667bda) to head (6678842).

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev    #2183   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   26.55%   26.55%           
=======================================
  Files         220      220           
  Lines       11459    11459           
  Branches      383      303   -80     
=======================================
  Hits         3043     3043           
  Misses       8416     8416           
Flag Coverage Δ
cli 59.32% <ø> (ø)
connection 14.76% <ø> (ø)
database 23.71% <ø> (ø)
gateway 9.86% <ø> (ø)
lobby 6.21% <ø> (ø)
login 5.96% <ø> (ø)
mcots 8.56% <ø> (ø)
nps 5.76% <ø> (ø)
patch 71.42% <ø> (ø)
persona 16.07% <ø> (ø)
sessions 85.71% <ø> (ø)
shard 43.31% <ø> (ø)
shared 14.35% <ø> (ø)
shared-packets 95.48% <ø> (ø)
transactions 60.74% <ø> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c667bda and 6678842.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/codecov.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/codecov.yml (2)

61-66: LGTM: New component for Team 2 added correctly.

The new component for Team 2 has been added with the correct structure, maintaining consistency with the existing Team 1 component.


61-66: Verify completeness of Team 2 paths.

Please confirm that all necessary paths for Team 2 are included. The current configuration covers packages/nps/**, packages/socket/**, and packages/shared/**. Ensure this accurately represents all the areas Team 2 is responsible for.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: List all directories under 'packages' to verify completeness

# Test: List all directories under 'packages'
fd --type d --max-depth 1 . packages

Comment on lines +61 to +66
- component_id: components_team2
name: Team 2
paths:
- packages/nps/**
- packages/socket/**
- packages/shared/**
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Overlapping 'packages/shared/' paths detected for Team 1 and Team 2.**

  • Both Team 1 and Team 2 specify 'packages/shared/**' in their coverage paths.
  • This overlap may lead to ambiguity in coverage attribution between teams.
🔗 Analysis chain

Clarify handling of overlapping 'shared' path.

Both Team 1 and Team 2 components include the packages/shared/** path. This overlap might lead to confusion in coverage attribution between teams. Consider clarifying how conflicts or overlaps in the shared path will be handled or if this is intentional.

If the intention is to have separate coverage for the shared package for each team, consider using more specific paths or implementing a strategy to differentiate coverage between teams.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other occurrences of 'packages/shared/**' in the file

# Test: Search for 'packages/shared/**' in the file
rg --type yaml 'packages/shared/\*\*' .github/codecov.yml

Length of output: 415


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other occurrences of 'packages/shared/**' in the file

# Test: Search for 'packages/shared/**' in the file
rg --type yaml 'packages/shared/\*\*' .github/codecov.yml

Length of output: 162

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant