-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement Send and Sync for softbuffer types #217
Conversation
Previously, types in softbuffer were !Send and !Sync. However it would be nice if types could be shared across threads. Therefore I've made the following changes: - Context<D> is Send+Sync iff D is Send+Sync - Surface<D, W> is Send iff D is Send+Sync and W is Send - Buffer<'x, D, W> is Send iff D if Send+Sync and W is Send Materially, I've made the following changes across the backends: - X11, Wayland and KMS use Arc for their displays instead of Rc. - MacOS uses MainThreadBound to secure windowing resources. This restriction was already implicitly enforced anyhow. - Windows uses a subclassing strategy to manage creating and destroying resources. This subclass is applied to windows that are registered into softbuffer, and is then used to manage resources. Closes #205 Signed-off-by: John Nunley <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Nunley <[email protected]>
@jackpot51 Please advise on Redox failures. I'm not familiar enough with Orbital's internals to know if it is thread safe or not. |
@jackpot51 Friendly reminder. I'm not familiar enough with Orbital to know how to proceed here. |
@jackpot51 confirmed in chat that Orbital's types should be thread-safe. Signed-off-by: John Nunley <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Nunley <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CG impl approved with suggestion applied
Co-authored-by: Mads Marquart <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Orbital change looks fine
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Confirming that Wasm can't be Send
or Sync
.
Signed-off-by: John Nunley <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Nunley <[email protected]>
It seems that there are still bugs in the Windows backend. Sometimes sending a message to a window on another thread doesn't work. Standby while I investigate. |
This new strategy discards the old subclassing strategy, which led to deadlocks when the main thread was blocked. Instead we instantiate a new thread specifically for creating and destroying DC's. Then we set up a channel so that all DCs are created and then destroyed on that thread. I am open to suggestions as to ways to avoid allocating the new thread. Signed-off-by: John Nunley <[email protected]>
Okay, I've set up a new strategy for multithreading on Windows. It's a little hacky but it seems to work. |
Signed-off-by: John Nunley <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Nunley <[email protected]>
I think we have approval from all platforms, so I'll go ahead and merge this. But I'll wait a week before releasing, that way the people using the |
Previously, types in softbuffer were !Send and !Sync. However it would
be nice if types could be shared across threads. Therefore I've made the
following changes:
Materially, I've made the following changes across the backends:
restriction was already implicitly enforced anyhow.
Send
.Closes #205, still WIP