Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compiler rewrite document added for collaboration #2139

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

troysgit
Copy link

Re. Zulip topic - https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Info.20re.2E.20compiler.20rewrite.20idea.20.28ncameron.2C.202023.29/near/481236544

Description

I am opening this PR to try to establish a central document for experts in the Rust compiler community to write their thoughts about a potential rewrite of the compiler.

Changes Made

  1. Document 'compiler-rewrite.md' added as an appendix to serve as a central document for authors to share their opinions and can then be synthesised into one piece of work as opposed to multiple separate blog posts or similar dispersed across the net.
  2. A reference to 'compiler-rewrite.md' added in 'SUMMARY.md'.

Additional Notes

This will undoubtedly require changes in formatting, location, etc. but I hope it serves as a starting point for contributors to use.

compiler-rewrite.md added as an appendix to serve as a central document for authors to share their opinions and can then be synthesised into one piece of work as opposed to multiple separate blog posts or similar.
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Nov 20, 2024

I don't think this is the right way to go about this if at all. No one had interest in the zulip thread, so I don't think anyone will be adding to your PR either.

@oli-obk oli-obk closed this Nov 20, 2024
@troysgit troysgit deleted the compiler-rewrite-docs branch November 20, 2024 04:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants