-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 13 pull requests #133329
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 13 pull requests #133329
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The deployment target environment variable is OS-specific, and if you're in a place where you're asking `rustc` for the deployment target, you're likely to also wanna know the environment variable.
The old name and comment suggest that this parser is only used for options beginning with `no-`, which is mostly true but not entirely true.
Passing an explicit boolean value (`on`, `off` etc.) appears to work, but actually puts the compiler into an unintended state where unstable _options_ are still forbidden, but unstable values of _some_ stable options are allowed.
When writing a constant name incorrectly in a pattern, the pattern will be identified as a new binding. We look for consts in the current crate, consts that where imported in the current crate and for local `let` bindings in case someone got them confused with `const`s. ``` error: unreachable pattern --> $DIR/const-with-typo-in-pattern-binding.rs:30:9 | LL | GOOOD => {} | ----- matches any value LL | LL | _ => {} | ^ no value can reach this | help: you might have meant to pattern match against the value of similarly named constant `GOOD` instead of introducing a new catch-all binding | LL | GOOD => {} | ~~~~ ``` Fix rust-lang#132582.
For the code pattern reported in <rust-lang#133272>, ```rs impl Foo { fn fun() { let S { ref Self } = todo!(); } } ``` <rust-lang#121208> converted this to a `span_bug` from a `span_delayed_bug` because this specific self-ctor code pattern lacked test coverage. It turns out this can be hit but we just lacked test coverage, so change it back to a `span_delayed_bug` and add a target tested case.
This also incorporates a number of other changes and fixes which would normally have been part of the automatic update, but which were blocked from landing because of the changes required to support shipping a crate as part of the chapter, along with those changes.
With the insertion of a new chapter 17 on async and await to _The Rust Programming Language_, references in compiler output to later chapters need to be updated to avoid confusing users. Redirects exist so that users who click old links will end up in the right place anyway, but this way users will be directed to the right URL in the first place.
This makes it possible to test an mdbook which has dependencies other than the direct crate for the book itself, e.g. the `trpl` crate used in _The Rust Programming Language_.
Since TRPL now depends on a `trpl` crate, the test needs to be able to build that crate to run mdbook against it, and also to invoke mdbook with `--library-path` in that case. Use the support for that flag added to `rustbook` in the previous change to invoke it with the path to the dependencies it will need to run `rustdoc` tests which reference `trpl`. Co-authored-by: Onur Özkan <[email protected]>
…ption "-X32_64" for AIX.
Without this change: $ ./x test --set build.vendor=true src/doc/book # (lots of output) error: failed to select a version for the requirement `futures = "^0.3"` (locked to 0.3.30) candidate versions found which didn't match: 0.3.31, 0.3.27 location searched: directory source `/Users/chris/dev/rust-lang/rust/vendor` (which is replacing registry `crates-io`) required by package `trpl v0.2.0 (/Users/chris/dev/rust-lang/rust/src/doc/book/packages/trpl)` perhaps a crate was updated and forgotten to be re-vendored? Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:01:19 With this change: $ ./x test --set build.vendor=true src/doc/book # (lots of build output) Testing stage1 mdbook src/doc/book (aarch64-apple-darwin) finished in 86.949 seconds Build completed successfully in 0:04:05
Is available since libc 0.2.162
distinguish overflow and unimplemented in Step::steps_between
Update TRPL to add new Chapter 17: Async and Await - Add support to `rustbook` to pass through the `-L`/`--library-path` flag to `mdbook` so that references to the `trpl` crate - Build the `trpl` crate as part of the book tests. Make it straightforward to add other such book dependencies in the future if needed by implementing that in a fairly general way. - Update the submodule for the book to pull in the new chapter on async and await, as well as a number of other fixes. This will happen organically/automatically in a week, too, but this lets me group this change with the next one: - Update the compiler messages which reference the existing chapters 17–20, which are now chapters 18-21. There are only two, both previously referencing chapter 18. - Update the UI tests which reference the compiler message outputs.
Stop being so bail-y in candidate assembly A conceptual follow-up to rust-lang#132084. We gotta stop bailing so much when there are errors; it's both unnecessary, leads to weird knock-on errors, and it's messing up the vibes lol
…Nadrieril Detect const in pattern with typo When writing a constant name incorrectly in a pattern, the pattern will be identified as a new binding. We look for consts in the current crate, consts that where imported in the current crate and for local `let` bindings in case someone got them confused with `const`s. ``` error: unreachable pattern --> $DIR/const-with-typo-in-pattern-binding.rs:30:9 | LL | GOOOD => {} | ----- matches any value LL | LL | _ => {} | ^ no value can reach this | help: you might have meant to pattern match against the value of similarly named constant `GOOD` instead of introducing a new catch-all binding | LL | GOOD => {} | ~~~~ ``` Fix rust-lang#132582.
…v-var, r=davidtwco Print name of env var in `--print=deployment-target` The deployment target environment variable is OS-specific, and if you're in a place where you're asking `rustc` for the deployment target, you're likely to also wanna know the name of the environment variable. I myself wanted this for some code I'm working on in bootstrap, for example. Behaviour before this PR: ```console $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-darwin deployment_target=11.0 $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-visionos deployment_target=1.0 ``` Behaviour after this PR: ```console $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-darwin MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=11.0 $ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-visionos XROS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=1.0 ``` My _belief_ is that this option is extremely rarely used in general, and a GitHub search for "rustc print deployment-target" seems to confirm this, it revealed only the following actual pieces of code using this: - https://github.com/PyO3/maturin/blob/b292ef69349f2a56cb8ab1b59fda0be3d3b9f138/src/build_context.rs#L1199-L1220 - https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/blob/daab9244b03e244c4f2511944870d719c443f61f/src/lib.rs#L3422-L3426 `maturin` does `.split('=').last()`, so it will continue to work after this change, but `cc v1.0.84` did `.strip_prefix("deployment_target=")` since [this PR](rust-lang/cc-rs#848), so it would break. That's _probably_ fine though, it was broken in a lot of scenarios anyway, and [got](rust-lang/cc-rs#901) [reverted](rust-lang/cc-rs#943) in `v1.0.85`. So while this is _technically_ a breaking change, I really doubt that anyone is going to observe it, so it's probably fine. ``@BlackHoleFox`` wdyt? ``@rustbot`` label O-apple r? compiler
…dtwco,wesleywiser aarch64 softfloat target: always pass floats in int registers This is a part of rust-lang#131058: on softfloat aarch64 targets, the float registers may be unavailable. And yet, LLVM will happily use them to pass float types if the corresponding target features are enabled. That's a problem as it means enabling/disabling `neon` instructions can change the ABI. Other targets have a `soft-float` target feature that forces the use of the soft-float ABI no matter whether float registers are enabled or not; aarch64 has nothing like that. So we follow the aarch64 [softfloat ABI](rust-lang#131058 (comment)) and treat floats like integers for `extern "C"` functions. For the "Rust" ABI, we do the same for scalars, and then just do something reasonable for ScalarPair that avoids the pointer indirection. Cc `@workingjubilee`
…, r=jieyouxu Don't allow `-Zunstable-options` to take a value Passing an explicit boolean value (`-Zunstable-options=on`, `off` etc.) sometimes appears to work, but actually puts the compiler into an unintended state where unstable _options_ are still forbidden, but unstable values of _some_ stable options are allowed. This is a result of `-Zunstable-options` being checked in multiple different places, in slightly different ways. Fixing the checks in `config::nightly_options` to understand boolean values would be non-trivial, so for now it's easier to make things consistent by forbidding values in the `-Z` parser. --- There were a few uses of this in tests, which happened to work because they were tests of unstable values.
…errors [AIX] Add option -X32_64 to the "strip" command The AIX `strip` utility requires option `-X` to specify the object mode. This patch adds the `-X32_64` option to the `strip` command so that it can handle both 32-bit and 64-bit objects. The parameter `option` of function `strip_symbols_with_external_utility`, previously a single string, has been changed to `options`, an array of string slices, to accommodate multiple `strip` options.
…iler-errors Minimally constify `Add` * This PR removes the requirement for `impl const` to have a const stability attribute. cc ``@RalfJung`` I believe you mentioned that it would make much more sense to require `const_trait`s to have const stability instead. I agree with that sentiment but I don't think that is _required_ for a small scale experimentation like this PR. rust-lang/project-const-traits#16 should definitely be prioritized in the future, but removing the impl check should be good for now as all callers need `const_trait_impl` enabled for any const impl to work. * This PR is intentionally minimal as constifying other traits can become more complicated (`PartialEq`, for example, would run into requiring implementing it for `str` as that is used in matches, which runs into the implementation for slice equality which uses specialization) Per the reasons above, anyone who is interested in making traits `const` in the standard library are **strongly encouraged** to reach out to us on the [Zulip channel](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/419616-t-compiler.2Fproject-const-traits) before proceeding with the work. cc ``@rust-lang/project-const-traits`` I believe there is prior approval from libs that we can experiment, so r? project-const-traits
…anieu re-export `is_loongarch_feature_detected` r? `@Amanieu`
…-errors Re-delay a resolve `bug` related to `Self`-ctor in patterns For the code pattern reported in <rust-lang#133272>, ```rs impl Foo { fn fun() { let S { ref Self } = todo!(); } } ``` <rust-lang#121208> converted this to a `span_bug` from a `span_delayed_bug` because this specific self-ctor code pattern lacked test coverage. It turns out this can be hit but we just lacked test coverage, so change it back to a `span_delayed_bug` and add a targeted test case. Follow-up to rust-lang#121208, cc ``@nnethercote`` (very good exercise to expose our test coverage gaps). Fixes rust-lang#133272.
…g-neg, r=workingjubilee Add code example for `wrapping_neg` method for signed integers With this example, we make it obvious that `wrapping_neg` works both ways (neg to pos and pos to neg). r? `@workingjubilee`
Use arc4random of libc for RTEMS target Switch to the `arc4random` from libc. It is available since libc 0.2.162
rustbot
added
A-run-make
Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Nov 22, 2024
@bors r+ rollup=never p=13 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Nov 22, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2024
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#130867 (distinguish overflow and unimplemented in Step::steps_between) - rust-lang#131859 (Update TRPL to add new Chapter 17: Async and Await) - rust-lang#132090 (Stop being so bail-y in candidate assembly) - rust-lang#132658 (Detect const in pattern with typo) - rust-lang#133041 (Print name of env var in `--print=deployment-target`) - rust-lang#133102 (aarch64 softfloat target: always pass floats in int registers) - rust-lang#133159 (Don't allow `-Zunstable-options` to take a value ) - rust-lang#133217 ([AIX] Add option -X32_64 to the "strip" command) - rust-lang#133237 (Minimally constify `Add`) - rust-lang#133238 (re-export `is_loongarch_feature_detected`) - rust-lang#133286 (Re-delay a resolve `bug` related to `Self`-ctor in patterns) - rust-lang#133301 (Add code example for `wrapping_neg` method for signed integers) - rust-lang#133313 (Use arc4random of libc for RTEMS target) Failed merges: - rust-lang#133215 (Fix missing submodule in `./x vendor`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Nov 22, 2024
@bors r- |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-run-make
Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
--print=deployment-target
#133041 (Print name of env var in--print=deployment-target
)-Zunstable-options
to take a value #133159 (Don't allow-Zunstable-options
to take a value )Add
#133237 (Minimally constifyAdd
)is_loongarch_feature_detected
#133238 (re-exportis_loongarch_feature_detected
)bug
related toSelf
-ctor in patterns #133286 (Re-delay a resolvebug
related toSelf
-ctor in patterns)wrapping_neg
method for signed integers #133301 (Add code example forwrapping_neg
method for signed integers)Failed merges:
./x vendor
#133215 (Fix missing submodule in./x vendor
)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup