Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Expose function evaluation from KLLVM bindings #4242

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 15, 2024
Merged

Expose function evaluation from KLLVM bindings #4242

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 15, 2024

Conversation

Baltoli
Copy link
Contributor

@Baltoli Baltoli commented Apr 13, 2024 •
edited by tothtamas28
Loading

@Baltoli Baltoli mentioned this pull request Apr 13, 2024
Closed
@Baltoli Baltoli added the pyk Issues transferred from runtimeverification/pyk label Apr 13, 2024
@tothtamas28 tothtamas28 marked this pull request as ready for review July 5, 2024 11:58
@tothtamas28 tothtamas28 requested a review from gtrepta July 5, 2024 11:59
@tothtamas28
Copy link
Contributor

@Baltoli, I cannot assign you as a reviewer, but please do an informal review nevertheless. Thanks!

Scott-Guest
Scott-Guest approved these changes Jul 11, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@Scott-Guest Scott-Guest left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, using this to unit test parts of the RISC-V semantics with no issue

@rv-jenkins rv-jenkins merged commit 0d3368d into develop Jul 15, 2024
18 checks passed
@rv-jenkins rv-jenkins deleted the kllvm-evaluate-function branch July 15, 2024 01:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@gtrepta gtrepta gtrepta approved these changes

@Scott-Guest Scott-Guest Scott-Guest approved these changes

Assignees

@tothtamas28 tothtamas28

Labels
automerge pyk Issues transferred from runtimeverification/pyk
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@Baltoli @tothtamas28 @Scott-Guest @gtrepta @rv-jenkins