Modifying the test code to make it less misleading

packages/npm-packages/ruby-wasm-wasi/test-e2e/integrations/js-require-remote.spec.ts

@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ if (!process.env.RUBY_NPM_PACKAGE_ROOT) {
       expect(await resolve()).toBe("Hello from RecursiveRequire::B");
     });
 
-    test("JS::RequireRemote#load loads a file with a relative path from base_url option", async ({
+    test("JS::RequireRemote#load loads the file with a path relative to the base_url specified by the base_url property.", async ({
       page
     }) => {
       const resolve = await resolveBinding(page, "checkResolved");
@@ -127,12 +127,13 @@ if (!process.env.RUBY_NPM_PACKAGE_ROOT) {
       <script src="browser.script.iife.js"></script>
       <script type="text/ruby" data-eval="async">
         require 'js/require_remote'
-        JS::RequireRemote.instance.base_url = 'fixtures'
-        JS.global.checkResolved JS::RequireRemote.instance.load 'error_on_load_twice'
+        JS::RequireRemote.instance.base_url = 'fixtures/recursive_require'
+        JS::RequireRemote.instance.load 'b'
+        JS.global.checkResolved RecursiveRequire::B.new.message
       </script>
      `);
 
-      expect(await resolve()).toBe(true);
+      expect(await resolve()).toBe("Hello from RecursiveRequire::B");
     });
   });
 }