DRAFT: restore various application test suites #230
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tcooper
added
priority: medium
From upstream: support functions added to lib/utils.pm clocks functions directory added in tests/applications/ minor correction in ...evince/aaa_setup.pm
|
Now working on clocks and evince needles capture. |
|
Evince tests now passing, clocks has install problem but well on the way. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This DRAFT PR contains initial changes to
templates.fif.jsonto restore multiple application install test suites to the Rocky openQA that were removed after initial upstream fork to limit the scope of work to migrate openQA to support Rocky.These tests require a large number of needles to be captured in order for them to be supported in Rocky Linux. While it is useful to compare upstream tests to understand test suite flow care needs to be taken because there may be substantial differences between Rocky 8 and 9 for these tests. I suggest we focus on adding these for Rocky 9 (and shortly 10) and do not spend significant effort making these work for Rocky 8.
Applying this branch to dev openqa instances will allow the needles to be captured and tests modified without increasing the number of failure in the production openQA instance needlessly.