-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Non-RI experience #23
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While writing this, I realized it may not be exactly what we want.
As implemented, if you have
state="RI"
and enter a zip code in any other state, you'll get the generic experience with IRA incentives only, because we have no state-level coverage in any other state. If we were to add coverage in MA, for example, and you entered a MA zip code, you'd get the error.I think you could make an argument for this behavior: the core thing it's preventing is showing some other state energy office's logo and incentives on your website.
But there are some weird emergent properties:
If we want the behavior instead to be straightforwardly "you get an error if the ZIP you enter is in a state other than
this.state
, regardless of coverage", then thecoverage
field I added to the API is not quite what we want. We'd have to change it to always reflect the location you entered.Thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's work through this from the desired UX?
I think for RI OER that's the last thing you said: "you get an error if the ZIP you enter is in a state other than this.state, regardless of coverage"? Let's do that if
state
is specified, but otherwise have it return whatever we have?I think this is probably worth workshopping with Spenser (fairly urgently) next week, so we can make sure we've got clearly designed and supported paths for each use-case?