-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
small clean-ups to SPECL functionality
- Loading branch information
1 parent
9635626
commit 35c85e6
Showing
3 changed files
with
38 additions
and
36 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
35c85e6
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are great fixes @PaulDudaRESPEC -- thanks for catching this!
FWIW - I was wondering if in the functon
spec_load_actions()
, setting there would be utility in setting 'ACTIONS' if it did not exist? I.e. something like:Or perhaps that is better done in the parse UCI functions? Or is it better the way you did it, where if it is not in the UCI, then it doesn't get included and all code should check for the existence of a given set of data in a UCI explicitly rather than trust it being there?