-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
aa340da
commit 73922cc
Showing
4 changed files
with
214 additions
and
10 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ | ||
--- | ||
sidebar_position: 3 | ||
--- | ||
|
||
# Git Cloud Providers | ||
|
||
## What is a Git Cloud Provider? | ||
|
||
The landscape of Git cloud providers has grown significantly, offering a variety of features and services tailored to different needs, from individual developers to large enterprises. This documentation provides an overview of several leading Git cloud providers, highlighting their key features, benefits, and potential use cases. | ||
|
||
## [GitHub](https://github.com) | ||
|
||
GitHub is one of the most popular Git cloud providers, offering a wide range of features and integrations that cater to developers, teams, and organizations. It provides a platform for hosting, reviewing, and collaborating on code, as well as managing software projects and workflows. Key features of GitHub include: | ||
|
||
- Vast community and social coding features | ||
- Integrated issue tracking, wikis, and GitHub Actions for CI/CD | ||
- GitHub Packages for package management | ||
- GitHub Codespaces for cloud-based development environments | ||
- Advanced code review tools | ||
|
||
### Benefits | ||
|
||
- Extensive integration with third-party tools | ||
- Strong community support and collaboration features | ||
- Comprehensive suite of tools for software development lifecycle | ||
- Robust security features including automated vulnerability scanning | ||
|
||
### Use Cases | ||
|
||
Ideal for open-source projects, enterprise software development, and teams looking for a collaborative development environment with integrated CI/CD and package management. | ||
|
||
## [GitLab](https://gitlab.com) | ||
|
||
GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that provides a single application for the entire software development lifecycle. It offers a built-in CI/CD pipeline, issue tracking, code review, and package registry, among other features. Key features of GitLab include: | ||
|
||
- Single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle | ||
- Integrated CI/CD, issue tracking, and code review | ||
- Auto DevOps for automatic CI/CD configuration | ||
- Container registry and Kubernetes integration | ||
- Comprehensive security scanning and compliance features | ||
|
||
### Benefits | ||
|
||
- Unified interface for managing the entire software development and deployment process | ||
- Scalable from small teams to large enterprises | ||
- Strong focus on automation and DevSecOps practices | ||
- Offers a self-hosted option for enhanced control and privacy | ||
|
||
### Use Cases | ||
|
||
Suitable for teams and organizations looking to streamline their DevOps practices with a single tool and for those with strong emphasis on security and compliance. | ||
|
||
## [Bitbucket](https://bitbucket.org) | ||
|
||
Bitbucket is a Git cloud provider that offers a range of features for teams and enterprises, including code hosting, code review, and CI/CD. It is part of the Atlassian suite of tools, providing seamless integration with Jira, Confluence, and other Atlassian products. Key features of Bitbucket include: | ||
|
||
- Integrated CI/CD with Bitbucket Pipelines | ||
- Jira integration for project management | ||
- Built-in code review tools and pull requests | ||
- Private repositories for small teams (free tier) | ||
- Trello integration for planning and collaboration | ||
|
||
### Benefits | ||
|
||
- Deep integration with Atlassian suite (Jira, Trello, etc.) | ||
- Offers both cloud-based and self-hosted options | ||
- Focus on team collaboration and productivity | ||
- Competitive pricing for small teams and startups | ||
|
||
### Use Cases | ||
|
||
Ideal for teams already using Atlassian products, small teams looking for a free private repository option, and organizations seeking a comprehensive suite of development and project management tools. | ||
|
||
## [Azure DevOps](https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/devops/) | ||
|
||
Azure DevOps is a set of development tools provided by Microsoft that includes version control, CI/CD, and project management. It offers a range of services, including Azure Repos for version control, Azure Pipelines for CI/CD, and Azure Boards for project management. Key features of Azure DevOps include: | ||
|
||
- Azure Repos for Git hosting | ||
- Azure Boards for project management and tracking | ||
- Azure Pipelines for CI/CD | ||
- Integrated code reviews and wikis | ||
- Extensive integration with Azure services and Microsoft ecosystem | ||
|
||
### Benefits | ||
|
||
- Seamless integration with Azure cloud services and Microsoft products | ||
- Comprehensive suite of tools covering the entire software development lifecycle | ||
- Strong support for Agile and Scrum methodologies | ||
- Scalable for both small projects and enterprise-scale applications | ||
|
||
### Use Cases | ||
|
||
Suitable for teams and organizations already using Azure cloud services, those looking for a comprehensive suite of development tools, and those following Agile or Scrum methodologies. | ||
|
||
## [Gitea](https://gitea.io) | ||
|
||
Gitea is a lightweight, open-source Git service that can be self-hosted or used as a cloud-based solution. It is designed to be fast, easy to use, and lightweight, making it suitable for small teams and individual developers. Key features of Gitea include: | ||
|
||
- Lightweight and open-source Git server written in Go | ||
- Easy to install and self-host on your own server | ||
- Integrated issue tracking, wikis, and code review | ||
- Supports webhooks and CI/CD integration | ||
- Highly customizable and extensible | ||
|
||
### Benefits | ||
|
||
- Minimal resource requirements, making it ideal for private or small-scale deployments | ||
- Full control over your Git infrastructure with self-hosting | ||
- Open-source and community-driven, with a focus on simplicity and efficiency | ||
- Flexible and adaptable to a wide range of use cases, from personal projects to small/medium businesses | ||
|
||
### Use Cases | ||
|
||
Perfect for individuals, teams, and organizations looking for a lightweight, self-hosted Git solution that offers essential features with minimal overhead. It's particularly appealing for those prioritizing privacy, full control over their Git infrastructure, and a customizable environment. | ||
|
||
## Conclusion | ||
|
||
The choice of a Git cloud provider or a self-hosted solution should align with your project's needs, team size, budget, and specific requirements like CI/CD integration, project management tools, and community support. GitHub, GitLab Azure DevOps, and Bitbucket offer robust cloud-based solutions with varying degrees of integration, community, and tooling support. Gitea stands out as a lightweight, customizable option for those seeking a self-hosted alternative. Each platform has its unique strengths, and the best choice depends on the specific needs and context of your development workflow. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ | ||
--- | ||
sidebar_position: 4 | ||
--- | ||
|
||
# Git Workflows | ||
|
||
Git workflows are structured processes that teams use to collaborate on software development projects efficiently. These workflows dictate how code is shared, reviewed, and deployed, enabling teams to manage their development processes effectively. In the context of Platform Engineering, where infrastructure as code (IaC), continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD), and operational efficiency are paramount, choosing the right Git workflow is critical. Below are the main Git workflows and their benefits for Platform Engineering. | ||
|
||
## Feature Branch Workflow | ||
|
||
In the Feature Branch Workflow, developers create new branches for each new feature or bug fix, isolating work from the main codebase (often the `main` or `master` branch). These branches are merged back into the main branch upon completion after code review. | ||
|
||
### Benefits | ||
|
||
- **Isolation**: Each feature or fix is developed in isolation, reducing the risk of conflicts with ongoing work in the main codebase. | ||
- **Collaboration**: Encourages collaboration by allowing multiple developers to work on different features simultaneously without interfering with each other. | ||
- **CI/CD Integration**: Easily integrates with CI/CD pipelines, where automated tests are run against branches before merging, ensuring that new changes do not break the infrastructure. | ||
|
||
## Gitflow Workflow | ||
|
||
Gitflow is an extension of the Feature Branch Workflow that defines specific branch types for different purposes, such as `feature`, `develop`, `release`, `hotfix`, and `main`. It's designed to manage releases more systematically. | ||
|
||
### Benefits | ||
|
||
- **Structured Releases**: Provides a clear structure for managing releases, making it easier to stage features and fixes before a full release. | ||
- **Stability**: The separation of development and production branches (develop vs. master) ensures that the production environment remains stable at all times. | ||
- **Emergency Fixes**: The hotfix branches allow for quick fixes to production issues without disrupting the rest of the development workflow. | ||
|
||
## Forking Workflow | ||
|
||
In the Forking Workflow, each developer works on a personal fork of the main repository. Changes are pushed to their forks and then submitted to the original repository via pull requests. This workflow is common in open-source projects. | ||
|
||
### Benefits | ||
|
||
- **Security**: Provides an additional layer of security, as the main repository's codebase is not directly exposed to all contributors. | ||
- **Decentralization**: Offers a more decentralized approach, where contributors do not need permission to make changes, promoting wider community contribution. | ||
- **Quality Control**: Maintainers have full control over what gets merged into the main codebase, ensuring that only changes that meet the project's standards are included. | ||
|
||
## Trunk-Based Development (TBD) | ||
|
||
Trunk-Based Development involves direct commits to a single branch (`trunk` or `main`) with very short-lived branches for features, if any. It emphasizes continuous integration and delivery. | ||
|
||
### Benefits | ||
|
||
- **Rapid Integration**: Encourages frequent merging to the main branch, facilitating continuous integration and deployment of changes. | ||
- **Simplicity**: Offers a simple workflow that is easy to understand and manage, reducing the overhead of managing multiple branches. | ||
- **Quick Feedback**: The emphasis on short-lived branches and continuous integration allows for quick feedback on changes, enabling faster iteration and improvement. | ||
|
||
## Conclusion | ||
|
||
The choice of a Git workflow in Platform Engineering should consider the team's size, project complexity, release management needs, and the desired balance between control and flexibility. Feature Branch and Gitflow workflows offer structured environments suitable for managing complex projects with clear release cycles. The Forking Workflow is ideal for projects with external contributors, offering a high level of control over what gets merged into the main codebase. Trunk-Based Development suits teams prioritizing rapid development cycles and continuous integration/delivery. Each workflow has its strengths, and the best choice depends on the specific needs and goals of the Platform Engineering team. |