Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 2, 2023. It is now read-only.

reproducible-agile/2023-8664-2-streetception

 
 

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

47 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Streetception

How safe or attractive do different people perceive streets to be and why?

In this repository we share the code and data we collected and analysed for the paper "Is it safe to be attractive? Disentangling the influence of streetscape features on the perceived safety and attractiveness of city streets".

The data contain ratings of perceived safety and attractiveness (using a 5-point Likert scale) coming from 403 participants who were asked to virtually navigate city streets in Frankfurt, Germany, through a sequence of street-level images. Moreover it contains their explanations of the ratings (in their own words).

In total we have collected data for 753 locations. In particular:

  • 7989 rating pairs of perceived safety and attractiveness
  • 19114 keywords used to explain the safety ratings
  • 18232 keywords used to explain the attractiveness ratings

Data

A DOI to the data can be found here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7712811

Structure of the data

[data_per_location.csv]

geometry_text path_id image_point_id order_id {safety,attractiveness}_{avg,stddev,difff} {safety,attractiveness}_reason {male, female, age_19_39_safety, age_40_59_safety, age_60_plus_safety}_{avg, count}
EPSG:4326 id of the path this location belongs to id of the image order of location in the path Average, Stddev, and difference of the safety and attractiveness ratings collected for this location (number) Reasons to explain the safety and attractiveness ratings the participants provided (text input) Number and average ratings of safety and attractiveness the participants provided per gender and age group

[text_attr_peruser.txt, text_unattr_peruser.txt, text_safe_peruser.txt, text_unsafe_peruser.txt]

All reasons participants provided to explain the ratings of locations with an average rating of safety or (attractiveness):

  • rating <= 2.5 (text_unattr_peruser.txt, text_unsafe_peruser.txt)
  • rating >=3.5 (text_attr_peruser.txt, text_safe_peruser.txt)

Example

Notebooks

Under the folder "notebook" you can find two notebooks

  • analysis_experimentation.ipynb: contains code for the analysis of the influence/relation of safety and attractiveness using the participation rating
  • word_analysis.ipynb: contains code for the analysis of the text-based input collected from the participants

About

Agile'2023 reproducibility process

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • Jupyter Notebook 100.0%