Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ruff formatting to unbreak main CI #3964

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 20, 2024
Merged

ruff formatting to unbreak main CI #3964

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 20, 2024

Conversation

masenf
Copy link
Collaborator

@masenf masenf commented Sep 20, 2024

No description provided.

@Lendemor Lendemor merged commit f9be184 into main Sep 20, 2024
32 checks passed
masenf added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2024
masenf added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
* Revert "ruff formatting to unbreak `main` CI (#3964)"

This reverts commit f9be184.

* Revert "bump python>=3.10 for 0.6.0 (#3956)"

This reverts commit fe1833c.

* drop python3.8 support

* relock dependencies

* Raise warning when < py310 is used

* Move python version check to reflex version check function

Avoid spammy deprecation warnings by only emitting warning once per project,
per reflex version, per reinit.

* Remove other references to python3.8
masenf added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
* Revert "ruff formatting to unbreak `main` CI (#3964)"

This reverts commit f9be184.

* Revert "bump python>=3.10 for 0.6.0 (#3956)"

This reverts commit fe1833c.

* drop python3.8 support

* relock dependencies

* Raise warning when < py310 is used

* Move python version check to reflex version check function

Avoid spammy deprecation warnings by only emitting warning once per project,
per reflex version, per reinit.

* Remove other references to python3.8
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants