-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(web): update language setting in extension based on client setting #99
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
web/src/index.css (2)
21-24
: Remove redundant ink bar stylingThere are two declarations for the ink bar styling:
- Lines 21-24: Sets height and color
- Lines 33-35: Sets background color with !important
Consider consolidating these into a single rule to improve maintainability.
.homepage-tabs .ant-tabs-ink-bar { height: 5px; - color: #ffffff; + background: #ffffff; } -.homepage-tabs .ant-tabs .ant-tabs-ink-bar { - background: #ffffff !important; -}Also applies to: 33-35
26-50
: Consider reducing the use of !important declarationsThe extensive use of !important flags (lines 28, 34, 38, 42, 46) suggests potential specificity issues in the CSS cascade. While they work, they make the styles harder to maintain and override when needed.
Consider:
- Using more specific selectors
- Reviewing the global styles that necessitate these overrides
- Organizing styles to minimize specificity conflicts
Example of more specific selectors:
-.homepage-tabs .ant-tabs .ant-tabs-tab { +.homepage-tabs.ant-tabs-wrapper .ant-tabs .ant-tabs-tab { color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.8); - font-size: 16px !important; + font-size: 16px; line-height: 22px; font-weight: 500; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
web/src/components/pages/extensions/sharedProviders.tsx
(2 hunks)web/src/i18n/provider.tsx
(2 hunks)web/src/index.css
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
web/src/components/pages/extensions/sharedProviders.tsx (1)
Line range hint 29-33
: LGTM: Clean implementation of language setting propagation
The addition of extensionSetLang
prop to the I18nProvider effectively implements the PR objective of updating the extension's language based on the client setting. The implementation maintains good separation of concerns by passing the language setting directly through props.
web/src/i18n/provider.tsx (2)
19-25
: LGTM: Well-structured component signature
The addition of the optional extensionSetLang
prop is well-typed and maintains backward compatibility.
36-36
: Consider adding language validation and documentation
While the locale determination logic is correct, consider these improvements:
- Validate that
extensionSetLang
contains a supported language code - Add a comment documenting the language selection precedence
+ // Language precedence: client setting > user preference > current language
+ const validLanguages = ['en', 'ja'];
+ const isValidLang = (lang?: string) => lang && validLanguages.includes(lang);
- const locale = extensionSetLang ? extensionSetLang : data?.me.lang ?? currentLang;
+ const locale = isValidLang(extensionSetLang) ? extensionSetLang :
+ (isValidLang(data?.me.lang) ? data?.me.lang : currentLang);
Let's verify the supported languages in the codebase:
web/src/index.css (1)
21-50
: LGTM! CSS restructuring improves maintainability
The flattening of nested rules and consistent class naming improves code organization while maintaining the same visual styling. The changes align well with the PR's objective of improving the extension UI.
What I've done
Made use of the language prop that is received from the client ( visualizer or classic ) to set the language displayed in the extension. Also made a small refactor to the tab CSS styles
What I haven't done
How I tested
Tested by running visualizer and classic locally and making changes to the client's language settings and checking the language displayed in the extension.
Link to video on Visualizer: https://eukarya-inc.slack.com/archives/C06S0GZR2DC/p1732069401402799
Link to video on Classic: https://eukarya-inc.slack.com/archives/C06S0GZR2DC/p1732069347418199
Which point I want you to review particularly
Notes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
SharedProviders
component for improved internationalization.extensionSetLang
prop in theProvider
component.Bug Fixes
.homepage-tabs
to improve specificity and maintainability without altering functionality.