the worth of a word

content/post/free-writing.md

@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+---
+title: "Teh worth of a workd"
+date: 2024-03-12T10:21:37+05:30
+categories: ["Game"]
+tags: ["writing","flow","casual","microessay","freewriting"]
+---
+
+
+Writing is an involved process. A rough overview is as follows:
+ - you think of an idea
+ - you build upon that idea with what you already know
+ - you structure out some initial drafts
+ - you run it under a careful eye to scrape out the loopholes
+ - you edit it, to the point of satisfaction
+
+The problem with that process is the last bullet right there. It makes
+the worth of a word in the moment diminish than the act of etching 
+something down in stone.  
+
+Up until this point in this microessay (excluding the title), I've been editing out typos
+immediately and am maintaining a reversibility of around ~5
+words. That is an interesting exercise but it isn't the end of the
+world.  
+
+From the end of this sentence, whatever I type, stays as if I've
+etched it onto stone. I keep the typso as well and do not
+backtrack. There is no backspace, no tab completoin (I'm using
+emacs)., no correcting punctuations that I did not intend to fill in,
+no grammatical corrections, ; if my sentence sounds like sh\*t, my
+sentences\* are shi\*t.   
+
+This is a lexical game that I''ll be regularly practicing henceforth
+to ramp up the worth of a workd. It's going to be more attuned towards
+natural language as there's no time travel whn you talk. you can't fix
+up something in the past. All that I can change is the formating
+(using markdown) so that teh medium doesn't get in the way of my words
+beging portrayed the way I realize tehm first in my mind.  
+
+Now, typos are not a thought but an action issue and hwo well I
+control my fingures (damn it...), I do see some phonetic overloading
+going on that is infuluencing my base intuitions of awhat a word looks 
+likt.  
+
+Core biases when I type something are slso survacing readily and it is
+quite interesting to see how we favor certain areas of the keyboard
+when we think of a letter rather than that specific key. For instance,
+",",".","'",";" are all somewhat intuitively grouped into a cluster
+with the specificity being recalled upon based on the context of your
+current phase of thought when you're typing own a sentence.  
+
+what is teh oint of this exercise you may ask:-
+ - I wis hto rveal my true though process 
+ - types are an initial hurdle that I'll just have to ignore and get
+   better at in the background
+ - the major baeneifit is that I get to actually write like I'm
+   thinking in the moment.
+ - I could plan way before I write adwon a sentence but that would
+   suck the joy ourt of this and wouldn't allow me to completely
+   explore my base inclinations.
+ - Humans, can figure out types -> typose pretty esily and this
+   shouldn't readily hinder their comprehension. I'd only user -> use
+   unnatural devices (-> is not a part of natral language) to avoid
+   conufusion in cases of semantic overlap.s.
+
+
+All such posts will be tagged as free-writing ; this is a micro-essay
+as well and I lpan on doing these more often or atleast one a day. Of
+course , you may rely me (fit in an on before the me in there) to
+conduct this out honestly and not feign spontatneity .   
+
+I've go t some other lexical gaems as well that i occasionaly enjoy ;
+will talk about thame in other posts. This is enough lexical crime
+commited for the day.