-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat : adds post validation test #1632
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to a PostgreSQL database migration script and corresponding test cases. The SQL migration script updates the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/PostRepositoryTest.java (2)
207-212
: Enhance test coverage for invalid data scenariosWhile the test is a good start, consider these improvements:
- Test null values in addition to empty strings
- Include status field validation (now NOT NULL)
- Use @ParameterizedTest for different scenarios
- Verify the error message content
Here's a suggested enhancement:
- @Test - void testInsertPostWithInvalidDataShouldFail() { - StepVerifier.create(postRepository.save(new Post().setTitle("").setContent(""))) - .expectError(IllegalArgumentException.class) - .verify(); - } + @ParameterizedTest + @MethodSource("invalidPostProvider") + void testInsertPostWithInvalidDataShouldFail(String title, String content, Status status, String expectedError) { + StepVerifier.create(postRepository.save(new Post() + .setTitle(title) + .setContent(content) + .setStatus(status))) + .expectErrorMatches(throwable -> + throwable instanceof IllegalArgumentException && + throwable.getMessage().contains(expectedError)) + .verify(); + } + + private static Stream<Arguments> invalidPostProvider() { + return Stream.of( + Arguments.of("", "content", Status.DRAFT, "title cannot be empty"), + Arguments.of(null, "content", Status.DRAFT, "title cannot be null"), + Arguments.of("title", "", Status.DRAFT, "content cannot be empty"), + Arguments.of("title", null, Status.DRAFT, "content cannot be null"), + Arguments.of("title", "content", null, "status cannot be null") + ); + }
207-212
: Consider reusing existing helper methodsThe test class has helper methods like
createPost()
that encapsulate post creation logic. Consider creating a similar helper method for invalid posts to maintain consistency and reduce duplication in future tests.+ private Mono<Post> createInvalidPost() { + return postRepository.save(new Post() + .setTitle("") + .setContent("") + .setStatus(null)); + } + @Test void testInsertPostWithInvalidDataShouldFail() { - StepVerifier.create(postRepository.save(new Post().setTitle("").setContent(""))) + StepVerifier.create(createInvalidPost()) .expectError(IllegalArgumentException.class) .verify(); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/resources/db/migration/postgresql/V1__01_init.sql
(1 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/PostRepositoryTest.java
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (1)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/resources/db/migration/postgresql/V1__01_init.sql (1)
8-10
: Verify migration strategy for NOT NULL constraintsAdding NOT NULL constraints is good practice for data integrity. However, since this is an init migration (V1), please verify:
- This is truly the first migration and there's no existing data
- The application's error handling properly manages these constraints
✅ Verification successful
NOT NULL constraints are properly handled by the application
The constraints are safe to add because:
- This is the first migration (V1)
- The Post entity properly maps all fields and provides a default value (DRAFT) for the status field
- Repository and service layers correctly handle all constrained fields
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are other migration files echo "Checking for other migration files..." fd -e sql . r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/resources/db/migration/ # Check if Post entity has corresponding validation echo "Checking Post entity validation..." rg "class Post" -A 10Length of output: 84777
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check complete Post entity implementation and status field usage echo "Checking Post entity and status field usage..." rg -l "status" r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/ rg "status" -A 5 -B 5 r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/ # Check repository/service implementations echo "Checking repository/service implementations..." rg "interface.*PostRepository|class.*PostService" -A 10 r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/Length of output: 10428
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/config/Initializer.java (1)
Line range hint
36-102
: Consider improving error handling and logging.The current implementation could benefit from:
- More granular error handling for each step in the chain instead of a single error handler at the end
- More descriptive logging that includes operation-specific details
Consider restructuring the chain of operations like this:
Mono.from(postsTagsRecordDeleteUsingStep) + .doOnError(e -> log.error("Failed to delete posts_tags", e)) .then(Mono.from(tagsRecordDeleteUsingStep)) + .doOnError(e -> log.error("Failed to delete tags", e)) .then(Mono.from(postCommentsRecordDeleteUsingStep)) + .doOnError(e -> log.error("Failed to delete post_comments", e)) // ... rest of the chain .subscribe( data -> log.debug("Retrieved data: {}", data), - error -> - log.debug("Failed to retrieve posts with comments and tags", error), + error -> log.error("Failed to retrieve posts with comments and tags", error), () -> log.debug("done"));
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/config/Initializer.java
(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (2)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/config/Initializer.java (2)
9-9
: LGTM!The addition of the Status enum import is appropriate for the new status column usage.
54-58
: Verify error handling for Status enum conversion.The insert operation correctly includes the new STATUS column with a PUBLISHED value. However, since we're using
Status.PUBLISHED.name()
which converts the enum to a string, we should ensure that:
- The database column type matches the enum string representation
- There's proper error handling for enum-to-string conversion in the data layer
Let's verify the database schema and related code:
✅ Verification successful
The enum handling implementation is correct and safe ✅
The current implementation is properly structured:
- The database column is correctly defined as
text NOT NULL
- JOOQ provides built-in enum-to-string conversion
- Using
Status.PUBLISHED.name()
is a safe approach as it matches the exact enum constant name🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the database column type definition rg -A 5 "status" "r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/resources/db/migration" # Check for enum-to-string conversion handling ast-grep --pattern 'enum Status { $$$ }'Length of output: 862
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find Status enum definition rg -p "enum Status" -A 5 # Look for type converters rg -p "class.*Converter" -A 5 rg -p "@Convert" -A 2Length of output: 246
title text, | ||
content text, | ||
status text, | ||
title text NOT NULL, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@coderabbitai, how to handle NOT BLANK scenario? if use input value as ""
it is allowing so I want to not allow it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rajadilipkolli To prevent empty strings, you can add CHECK constraints to ensure the columns contain at least one non-whitespace character. Here's how you can modify your table:
ALTER TABLE posts
ADD CONSTRAINT check_title_not_blank CHECK (LENGTH(TRIM(title)) > 0),
ADD CONSTRAINT check_content_not_blank CHECK (LENGTH(TRIM(content)) > 0),
ADD CONSTRAINT check_status_not_blank CHECK (LENGTH(TRIM(status)) > 0);
This will:
- Ensure
title
is not blank or just whitespace - Ensure
content
is not blank or just whitespace - Ensure
status
is not blank or just whitespace
You can add these constraints to your migration file after the table creation.
⟪ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ⟫ thoughtfully taking notes about PostgreSQL constraints
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: rajadilipkolli
PR: rajadilipkolli/my-spring-boot-experiments#1632
File: r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/resources/db/migration/postgresql/V1__01_init.sql:8-8
Timestamp: 2025-01-10T06:17:49.785Z
Learning: In PostgreSQL, to prevent empty strings or whitespace-only values in text columns, use CHECK constraints with LENGTH(TRIM(column_name)) > 0. This is more robust than just NOT NULL constraint which allows empty strings.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/service/PostService.java (1)
74-78
: Consider making the post status configurableThe status is currently hardcoded to
DRAFT
. Consider updatingCreatePostCommand
to accept a status parameter, allowing for more flexibility in post creation..columns(POSTS.TITLE, POSTS.CONTENT, POSTS.STATUS) .values( createPostCommand.title(), createPostCommand.content(), - Status.DRAFT.name()) + createPostCommand.status().name())r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/PostRepositoryTest.java (1)
225-232
: Consider additional test cases for comprehensive validationThe test cases cover basic null/empty scenarios well. Consider adding:
- Whitespace-only values (e.g., " ")
- Extremely long values to test any length constraints
private static Stream<Arguments> invalidPostProvider() { return Stream.of( Arguments.of(null, "content", Status.DRAFT, "title"), Arguments.of("", "content", Status.DRAFT, "title"), + Arguments.of(" ", "content", Status.DRAFT, "title"), Arguments.of("title", "content", null, "status"), Arguments.of("title", "", Status.DRAFT, "content"), - Arguments.of("title", null, Status.DRAFT, "content")); + Arguments.of("title", null, Status.DRAFT, "content"), + Arguments.of("title", " ", Status.DRAFT, "content"), + Arguments.of("x".repeat(1001), "content", Status.DRAFT, "title")); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/service/PostService.java
(2 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/resources/db/migration/postgresql/V1__01_init.sql
(2 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/PostRepositoryTest.java
(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/resources/db/migration/postgresql/V1__01_init.sql
🔇 Additional comments (3)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/service/PostService.java (1)
11-11
: LGTM!The Status model import is correctly added to support the new status field functionality.
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/PostRepositoryTest.java (2)
21-21
: LGTM!The imports are correctly added to support parameterized testing functionality.
Also applies to: 24-26
211-223
: LGTM! Well-structured parameterized testThe test method effectively validates the database constraints for invalid post data. Good use of parameterized testing to cover multiple scenarios.
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Summary by CodeRabbit
Database Changes
NOT NULL
constraints totitle
,content
, andstatus
columns in theposts
table to enforce data integrity.POSTS
table to include a newstatus
column with the value set to "PUBLISHED".Tests