feat : adds IntegrationTest for JobInvoker #1585
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
type: dependency-upgrade
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
batch-boot-jpa-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootbatchjpa/web/controllers/JobInvokerControllerIT.java (1)
13-18: Enhance test coverage with additional scenarios.While the basic happy path is covered, consider adding the following test cases:
- Edge cases with invalid minId/maxId values
- Missing required parameters
- Verification of actual job execution effects
- More specific response content validation
Here's a suggested enhancement:
@Test void shouldInvokeAllCustomersJob() throws Exception { mockMvc.perform(get("/api/job/customers").param("minId", "0").param("maxId", "100")) .andExpect(status().isOk()) - .andExpect(content().string(containsString("Batch job has been invoked as"))); + .andExpect(content().string(containsString("Batch job has been invoked as"))) + .andExpect(jsonPath("$.jobId").exists()); } + +@Test +void shouldReturnBadRequestForInvalidIds() throws Exception { + mockMvc.perform(get("/api/job/customers").param("minId", "100").param("maxId", "0")) + .andExpect(status().isBadRequest()); +} + +@Test +void shouldReturnBadRequestForMissingParameters() throws Exception { + mockMvc.perform(get("/api/job/customers")) + .andExpect(status().isBadRequest()); +}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
batch-boot-jpa-sample/pom.xml(1 hunks)batch-boot-jpa-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootbatchjpa/web/controllers/JobInvokerControllerIT.java(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- batch-boot-jpa-sample/pom.xml
🔇 Additional comments (3)
batch-boot-jpa-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootbatchjpa/web/controllers/JobInvokerControllerIT.java (3)
1-10: LGTM! Well-organized imports.
The imports are clean, relevant, and properly organized with static imports grouped separately.
11-11: Verify the base class setup for integration testing.
The class extends AbstractIntegrationTest. Let's verify the base class provides necessary setup for integration testing.
✅ Verification successful
Base class provides proper integration test setup
The AbstractIntegrationTest base class provides all the necessary setup for integration testing:
@SpringBootTestwithRANDOM_PORTfor web environment testing@AutoConfigureMockMvcfor testing REST endpoints@ActiveProfilesfor test profile activation- Common test utilities like
MockMvcandObjectMapper - Container configuration through
ContainersConfigclass - Proper test isolation through random port allocation
The class follows Spring Boot testing best practices and provides a solid foundation for integration tests.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the base class setup for integration testing
# Expected: AbstractIntegrationTest should contain @SpringBootTest and other necessary annotations/setup
ast-grep --pattern 'class AbstractIntegrationTest {
$$$
}'
# Also check for any similar integration tests
fd -e java -E 'target|build' . | xargs rg "extends AbstractIntegrationTest"
Length of output: 12633
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual implementation of AbstractIntegrationTest to verify the setup
rg -l "AbstractIntegrationTest" | xargs rg -l "@SpringBootTest|@TestConfiguration" | xargs cat
Length of output: 29379
1-19: Verify test patterns in other controller tests.
Let's check if other controller tests in the codebase have established patterns or more comprehensive test coverage that could be applied here.
✅ Verification successful
Test coverage appears adequate for the job invocation endpoint
After examining the test patterns in the same project, particularly the CustomerControllerIT.java, the current test coverage in JobInvokerControllerIT is appropriate for its purpose because:
-
The test verifies the essential aspects of the job invocation endpoint:
- Correct HTTP method (GET)
- Required parameters (minId, maxId)
- Expected response status (200 OK)
- Expected response content
-
Unlike the
CustomerControllerITwhich tests CRUD operations requiring extensive validation, the job invocation endpoint is a simple trigger endpoint that only needs to verify the successful initiation of the batch job.
The test follows the project's established patterns for controller integration tests while maintaining an appropriate level of coverage for its specific use case.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for similar controller test patterns
# Expected: Find other controller tests that might have established patterns
# Find all controller integration tests
fd -e java -E 'target|build' ControllerIT.java
# Look for common test patterns in controller tests
rg -A 5 "@Test.*perform\(.*\)" --type java
Length of output: 4363
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the test patterns in a few relevant controller tests from the same project
# First, let's look at CustomerControllerIT in the same project
cat "batch-boot-jpa-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootbatchjpa/web/controllers/CustomerControllerIT.java"
# Let's also check for common test patterns across controller tests
rg -l "mockMvc.perform" --type java | xargs rg -A 10 "@Test.*mockMvc.perform" --type java
Length of output: 6099
Qodana Community for JVM106 new problems were found
☁️ View the detailed Qodana report Contact Qodana teamContact us at [email protected]
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
batch-boot-jpa-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootbatchjpa/web/controllers/JobInvokerControllerIT.java (2)
9-20: Consider verifying actual job executionWhile the test verifies the API response, it would be valuable to assert that the job was actually triggered and executed successfully. Consider adding assertions to verify:
- Job execution status in the job repository
- Any side effects of the job (e.g., database changes)
22-29: Enhance error case coverageConsider adding separate test cases for:
- Missing minId parameter
- Missing maxId parameter
- Invalid parameter values (e.g., negative numbers, maxId < minId)
This would provide better coverage of error scenarios and validation logic.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
batch-boot-jpa-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootbatchjpa/common/AbstractIntegrationTest.java(2 hunks)batch-boot-jpa-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootbatchjpa/web/controllers/CustomerControllerIT.java(1 hunks)batch-boot-jpa-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootbatchjpa/web/controllers/JobInvokerControllerIT.java(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
batch-boot-jpa-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootbatchjpa/common/AbstractIntegrationTest.java (1)
12-12: Great addition of MockMvcTester!
The addition of MockMvcTester is a good improvement as it provides a more fluent and readable API for testing Spring MVC endpoints compared to traditional MockMvc assertions.
Also applies to: 23-24
batch-boot-jpa-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootbatchjpa/web/controllers/CustomerControllerIT.java (1)
Line range hint 88-107: Good improvement in test method naming
The rename from shouldReturn400WhenCreateNewCustomerWithoutText to shouldReturn400WhenCreateNewCustomerWithoutName better reflects what's being tested. The test implementation is thorough with detailed assertions of the problem details response format.
rajadilipkolli
deleted the
1377-add-integration-test-for-job-controller-in-boot-batch-sample-code
branch
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
MockMvcTesterfield in the base integration test class.Bug Fixes
Improvements