Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat : adds dynamic sort #1571
feat : adds dynamic sort #1571
Changes from 3 commits
7dccc33
c0266d5
409992a
326ec24
ab911f3
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation for sort direction field
The
direction
field should be constrained to valid sort directions to prevent runtime errors.Consider using an enum and adding validation:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider adding field name validation and sanitization.
While the sort implementation effectively uses Java 8+ features, it could benefit from additional security measures:
Here's a suggested implementation:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@coderabbitai, how to print the specification here in human readable format?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rajadilipkolli, to print the specification in a human-readable format, you can override the
toString()
method in yourSpecification
implementations. If yourEntitySpecification
class builds customSpecification
instances, you can modify them to include meaningfultoString()
methods.Since you're constructing the specification using the search criteria list, another approach is to log the search criteria directly. For example:
This will output the list of
SearchCriteria
objects, which should give you a readable representation of the search parameters used.If you prefer to see the actual predicates or the detailed structure of the specification, you might need to implement a custom method to traverse and display the specification components. However, logging the search criteria or enhancing the
toString()
method in your specifications is often sufficient for debugging purposes.Let me know if you need further assistance!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@coderabbitai, can you please help me to write custom method to traverse and display the specification components.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rajadilipkolli, certainly! To write a custom method to traverse and display the components of your JPA
Specification
, you can create a customSpecification
implementation that keeps track of each criterion and provides a human-readable representation.Here's how you can achieve this:
Create a Custom Specification Wrapper:
Define a wrapper class that implements
Specification
and includes a description of the criterion.Modify Your Specification Builder:
In your
EntitySpecification
class, modify the builder method to useDescriptiveSpecification
.Ensure
SearchCriteria
Has a MeaningfultoString()
:Update Logging in
AnimalService
:Now, when you log the specification, it will display a human-readable format.
This will output something like:
Example Usage in
AnimalService
:Notes:
Custom Specification (
CustomSpecification
): Ensure that your individual criterion specifications (CustomSpecification
) are correctly implemented to handle eachSearchCriteria
.Combining Specifications: The
and
andor
methods inDescriptiveSpecification
help maintain the descriptive string as specifications are combined.Thread Safety: If your application is multithreaded, consider thread safety when storing and combining descriptions.
This approach allows you to keep your specifications functional while providing insight into the criteria being applied, which is invaluable for debugging complex queries.
Let me know if you need further assistance or any clarification!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@coderabbitai, can you please create an issue to implement above feature
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rajadilipkolli, I've created a new GitHub issue to implement the custom method to traverse and display the Specification components as per your request. You can find the issue here: #1574.
🔗 Analysis chain
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 724