Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat : polish r2dbc and upgrade postgres #1550

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2024
Merged

feat : polish r2dbc and upgrade postgres #1550

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

rajadilipkolli
Copy link
Owner

@rajadilipkolli rajadilipkolli commented Dec 3, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new test classes: TestJooqR2dbcApplication and TestR2dbcApplication for enhanced testing capabilities.
  • Updates

    • Updated PostgreSQL Docker image version to 17.2-alpine across multiple services.
    • Upgraded googleJavaFormat plugin version to 1.25.0 for improved code formatting.
  • Refactor

    • Renamed main application classes from Application to JooqR2dbcApplication and R2dbcApplication for clarity.
    • Refactored configuration classes to enhance structure and maintainability.

@rajadilipkolli rajadilipkolli self-assigned this Dec 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates to the PostgreSQL image version across multiple Docker Compose and Maven configuration files, changing it from 16.x-alpine to 17.2-alpine. Additionally, it modifies class names in Java files to enhance clarity and introduces new test application classes. The changes primarily focus on updating dependencies without altering the overall structure or functionality of the application.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/docker/docker-compose.yml Updated PostgreSQL image version from 16.6-alpine to 17.2-alpine for postgresqldb service.
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/pom.xml Updated containerImage in testcontainers-jooq-codegen-maven-plugin from 16.3-alpine to 17.2-alpine; updated googleJavaFormat plugin version from 1.22.0 to 1.25.0.
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/JooqR2dbcApplication.java Renamed class from Application to JooqR2dbcApplication.
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/TestJooqR2dbcApplication.java Added new class TestJooqR2dbcApplication for testing purposes.
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/common/AbstractIntegrationTest.java Updated @SpringBootTest annotation to use ContainerConfig.class instead of TestApplication.class.
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/common/ContainerConfig.java Renamed class from TestApplication to ContainerConfig; removed main method; updated PostgreSQL image version to 17.2-alpine.
r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/docker/docker-compose.yml Updated PostgreSQL image version from 16.6-alpine to 17.2-alpine for postgresqldb service.
r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/pom.xml Updated googleJavaFormat version from 1.22.0 to 1.25.0.
r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/bootr2dbc/R2dbcApplication.java Renamed class from Application to R2dbcApplication.
r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootr2dbc/TestR2dbcApplication.java Added new class TestR2dbcApplication for testing purposes.
r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootr2dbc/common/AbstractIntegrationTest.java Updated @SpringBootTest annotation to use ContainerConfig.class instead of TestApplication.class.
r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootr2dbc/common/ContainerConfig.java Renamed class from TestApplication to ContainerConfig; removed main method; updated PostgreSQL image version to 17.2-alpine.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

type: dependency-upgrade, component: r2dbc, component: read-replica-postgres

🐇 In the garden where code does bloom,
Upgraded versions chase away gloom.
PostgreSQL hops to a new height,
With changes that feel just right!
JooqR2dbc now takes the stage,
In tests, our code will engage! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added type: dependency-upgrade Pull requests that update a dependency file component: r2dbc labels Dec 3, 2024
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootr2dbc/TestR2dbcApplication.java (2)

6-11: Add class-level documentation to explain the test purpose.

Consider adding Javadoc to explain this class's role in the testing infrastructure.

+/**
+ * Test application configuration that bootstraps the application with test-specific
+ * container configuration for integration testing purposes.
+ */
 public class TestR2dbcApplication {

1-11: Consider test configuration organization patterns.

The approach of using a separate test application class with container configuration is good practice. However, consider these architectural suggestions:

  1. Create a dedicated test-config package for test configurations if you have multiple test configuration classes
  2. Consider using test slices (@DataR2dbcTest) for focused repository tests
  3. Document the relationship between this test configuration and the container setup in README or test documentation

This will help maintain test organization as the test suite grows.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8cb9087 and a729e0d.

📒 Files selected for processing (12)
  • r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/docker/docker-compose.yml (1 hunks)
  • r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/pom.xml (2 hunks)
  • r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/JooqR2dbcApplication.java (1 hunks)
  • r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/TestJooqR2dbcApplication.java (1 hunks)
  • r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/common/AbstractIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
  • r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/common/ContainerConfig.java (2 hunks)
  • r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/docker/docker-compose.yml (1 hunks)
  • r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/pom.xml (1 hunks)
  • r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/bootr2dbc/R2dbcApplication.java (1 hunks)
  • r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootr2dbc/TestR2dbcApplication.java (1 hunks)
  • r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootr2dbc/common/AbstractIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
  • r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootr2dbc/common/ContainerConfig.java (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/docker/docker-compose.yml
  • r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/pom.xml
  • r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/bootr2dbc/R2dbcApplication.java
🔇 Additional comments (13)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/JooqR2dbcApplication.java (2)

11-11: LGTM! Improved class naming

The new class name JooqR2dbcApplication better reflects the technology stack and purpose of the application, following Spring Boot naming conventions.


14-14: LGTM! Consistent class reference

The main method has been correctly updated to reference the new class name.

r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootr2dbc/common/AbstractIntegrationTest.java (2)

15-15: LGTM! Improved semantic naming

The change from TestApplication to ContainerConfig better reflects the purpose of the configuration class, making the test setup more clear and maintainable.


15-15: Verify ContainerConfig setup

Let's verify that ContainerConfig exists and is properly configured with the upgraded PostgreSQL version.

✅ Verification successful

ContainerConfig is properly configured with PostgreSQL 17.2

The ContainerConfig class exists in the expected package and is correctly configured with PostgreSQL 17.2-alpine, which is the latest version used in the R2DBC samples.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify ContainerConfig exists and contains the upgraded PostgreSQL version

# Check if ContainerConfig exists in the expected package
echo "Checking for ContainerConfig class..."
fd -e java ContainerConfig

# Verify PostgreSQL version in ContainerConfig
echo "Checking PostgreSQL version in ContainerConfig..."
rg -A 5 "postgres:" --type java

Length of output: 7756

r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/docker/docker-compose.yml (1)

5-5: Verify compatibility with PostgreSQL 17.x major version upgrade

The upgrade from PostgreSQL 16.6 to 17.2 looks good, but as this is a major version upgrade, please ensure:

  1. The r2dbc driver version is compatible with PostgreSQL 17
  2. Review PostgreSQL 17's breaking changes and new features that might affect the application
  3. Test the application thoroughly as major version upgrades can introduce compatibility issues

Let's verify the r2dbc driver compatibility:

✅ Verification successful

PostgreSQL 17.2 upgrade is compatible with the current setup

The upgrade from PostgreSQL 16.6 to 17.2 is safe to proceed because:

  • The project uses Spring Boot 3.4.0, which includes up-to-date R2DBC drivers compatible with PostgreSQL 17
  • R2DBC driver versions are managed by Spring Boot's dependency management, ensuring compatibility
  • The R2DBC configuration is minimal and version-agnostic, reducing the risk of version-specific issues
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for PostgreSQL 17 compatibility in pom.xml files

# Search for r2dbc dependency versions in pom files
echo "Checking r2dbc driver versions in pom.xml files:"
rg -A 2 "r2dbc-postgresql" --type xml

# Search for any PostgreSQL related configuration or properties
echo -e "\nChecking for PostgreSQL configuration:"
rg -A 2 "spring.r2dbc" --type properties --type yml

Length of output: 1221


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the version of r2dbc-postgresql being used
echo "Checking r2dbc-postgresql version:"
rg -B 2 "r2dbc-postgresql" --type xml | rg "<version>|<parent>|<artifactId>"

# Check for application.yml/properties files
echo -e "\nChecking for application configuration files:"
fd -e yml -e yaml -e properties

# Check parent pom for dependency management
echo -e "\nChecking parent pom for dependency management:"
rg -A 5 "r2dbc-postgresql" pom.xml

Length of output: 18407


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the r2dbc configuration in the application properties/yaml files
echo "Checking r2dbc configuration in application files:"
rg "r2dbc" r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/src/main/resources/application.properties

# Check Spring Boot parent version which manages r2dbc dependencies
echo -e "\nChecking Spring Boot parent version:"
rg -A 2 "<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-parent" r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/pom.xml

# Check for any r2dbc version properties
echo -e "\nChecking for r2dbc version properties:"
rg "<r2dbc.*version>" --type xml

Length of output: 689

r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootr2dbc/TestR2dbcApplication.java (2)

1-4: LGTM! Clean package structure and imports.

The package name follows conventions and imports are minimal and necessary.


9-9: Verify referenced application configuration.

Let's verify the existence and accessibility of the referenced main class and container configuration.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different search strategy to locate these classes.


Let me check the content of the specific files we need to verify.


Both referenced classes exist and are properly configured.

The verification confirms that:

  • R2dbcApplication exists with a proper main method that can be referenced by R2dbcApplication::main
  • ContainerConfig exists as a test configuration class with proper container setup for PostgreSQL
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of referenced classes and their configurations

# Check for R2dbcApplication main class
echo "Checking R2dbcApplication main method..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class R2dbcApplication {
  $$$
  public static void main(String[] $_) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

# Check ContainerConfig class configuration
echo "Checking ContainerConfig..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class ContainerConfig {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 325


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for R2dbcApplication and ContainerConfig files
echo "Searching for R2dbcApplication..."
fd "R2dbcApplication.java" --type f

echo -e "\nSearching for ContainerConfig..."
fd "ContainerConfig.java" --type f

echo -e "\nChecking content of found files..."
for file in $(fd -e java); do
    echo -e "\nFile: $file"
    rg -l "class (R2dbcApplication|ContainerConfig)" "$file"
done

Length of output: 131070


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check R2dbcApplication main class content
echo "Checking R2dbcApplication.java content..."
cat r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/bootr2dbc/R2dbcApplication.java

echo -e "\nChecking ContainerConfig.java content..."
cat r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootr2dbc/common/ContainerConfig.java

Length of output: 1505

r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/TestJooqR2dbcApplication.java (1)

6-11: LGTM! Verify ContainerConfig integration

The implementation follows Spring Boot test best practices by using SpringApplication.from() pattern. The code is clean and focused.

Let's verify the referenced classes exist:

✅ Verification successful

Let me verify the ContainerConfig class and its integration with the test setup.


ContainerConfig integration verified successfully

The verification confirms proper integration:

  • JooqR2dbcApplication exists in the main source
  • ContainerConfig is properly implemented in the test source with PostgreSQL container setup
  • ContainerConfig is correctly used in AbstractIntegrationTest with @SpringBootTest
  • The test application correctly references both classes in its configuration
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence and proper setup of referenced classes
echo "Checking JooqR2dbcApplication reference..."
rg -l "class JooqR2dbcApplication" r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/

echo "Checking ContainerConfig integration in tests..."
rg -l "@SpringBootTest.*ContainerConfig" r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/

Length of output: 548


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check ContainerConfig implementation and its usage
echo "Checking ContainerConfig implementation..."
rg -l "class ContainerConfig" r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/

echo "Checking ContainerConfig content..."
rg -A 10 "class ContainerConfig" r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/

echo "Checking AbstractIntegrationTest usage..."
rg -A 5 "@SpringBootTest.*ContainerConfig" r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/

Length of output: 2829

r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/bootr2dbc/common/ContainerConfig.java (1)

10-16: Verify PostgreSQL 17.2 compatibility

The upgrade to PostgreSQL 17.2-alpine is significant. While the configuration is clean, we should verify compatibility.

Let's check for any known issues with PostgreSQL 17.2:

Consider adding health checks and timeout configurations for more robust container initialization:

 PostgreSQLContainer<?> postgreSQLContainer() {
-    return new PostgreSQLContainer<>(DockerImageName.parse("postgres:17.2-alpine"));
+    return new PostgreSQLContainer<>(DockerImageName.parse("postgres:17.2-alpine"))
+            .withStartupTimeout(Duration.ofSeconds(60))
+            .withStartupAttempts(3);
 }
✅ Verification successful

PostgreSQL 17.2 version is consistently used across the project

The verification shows that PostgreSQL 17.2-alpine is consistently used across all relevant configurations:

  • Docker Compose files in both boot-r2dbc-sample and boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample
  • Test container configurations
  • Maven configuration in pom.xml
  • Compose configuration in boot-r2dbc-reactive-cache

The upgrade is properly synchronized across the entire codebase, ensuring compatibility and consistency.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent PostgreSQL version usage across the project
echo "Checking PostgreSQL version consistency..."
rg -l "postgres:(16|17)" r2dbc/

# Check for any PostgreSQL 17 specific configurations in the codebase
echo "Checking for PostgreSQL 17 specific configurations..."
rg "postgresql\.conf|pg_hba\.conf" r2dbc/

Length of output: 658


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the specific PostgreSQL versions used in these files
echo "=== PostgreSQL versions in docker-compose files ==="
rg "postgres:(16|17)" r2dbc/*/docker/docker-compose.yml

echo "=== PostgreSQL versions in test configurations ==="
rg "postgres:(16|17)" r2dbc/*/src/test/java/com/example/*/common/ContainerConfig.java

echo "=== PostgreSQL version in pom.xml ==="
rg "postgres:(16|17)" r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/pom.xml

echo "=== PostgreSQL version in compose.yaml ==="
rg "postgres:(16|17)" r2dbc/boot-r2dbc-reactive-cache/compose.yaml

Length of output: 1151

r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/common/ContainerConfig.java (1)

11-20: Good use of initialization script, consider additional configuration options

The configuration with init.sql is a good practice. The PostgreSQL version is consistent with other files.

Consider enhancing the container configuration with additional options for better test stability:

 PostgreSQLContainer<?> postgreSQLContainer() {
     return new PostgreSQLContainer<>(DockerImageName.parse("postgres:17.2-alpine"))
             .withCopyFileToContainer(
                     MountableFile.forClasspathResource("init.sql"),
-                    "/docker-entrypoint-initdb.d/init.sql");
+                    "/docker-entrypoint-initdb.d/init.sql")
+            .withStartupTimeout(Duration.ofSeconds(60))
+            .withStartupAttempts(3)
+            .withLogConsumer(outputFrame -> {
+                if (outputFrame.getType() == STDERR) {
+                    logger.error(outputFrame.getUtf8String());
+                }
+            });
 }

Let's verify the init.sql file:

✅ Verification successful

Suggested container configuration improvements can be simplified

The init.sql script only adds the UUID extension, which is a lightweight operation. Given the existing logging configuration in logback-test.xml already handles container logs appropriately, we can simplify the suggested improvements to focus on stability timeouts:

 PostgreSQLContainer<?> postgreSQLContainer() {
     return new PostgreSQLContainer<>(DockerImageName.parse("postgres:17.2-alpine"))
             .withCopyFileToContainer(
                     MountableFile.forClasspathResource("init.sql"),
-                    "/docker-entrypoint-initdb.d/init.sql");
+                    "/docker-entrypoint-initdb.d/init.sql")
+            .withStartupTimeout(Duration.ofSeconds(60))
+            .withStartupAttempts(3);
 }
  • The custom log consumer is unnecessary as the logback configuration already handles Testcontainers logs at INFO level
  • The initialization script is minimal and focused, which is good practice
  • Startup timeout and attempts are still valuable for test stability
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for the existence and content of init.sql
echo "Checking for init.sql..."
fd -t f "init.sql" r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/resources/

# Verify no hardcoded credentials in init.sql
echo "Checking for potential sensitive data in init.sql..."
fd -t f "init.sql" r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/resources/ -x rg -i "password|secret|credential"

Length of output: 404


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of init.sql to understand the initialization setup
cat r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/resources/init.sql

# Also check if there are any logging configurations in the test resources
fd -t f "logback-test.xml|application-test.properties|application-test.yml" r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/resources/ -x cat

Length of output: 790

r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/common/AbstractIntegrationTest.java (1)

14-14: Verify ContainerConfig class configuration

The change from TestApplication to ContainerConfig suggests a more focused approach to container configuration. This aligns well with the separation of concerns principle.

✅ Verification successful

ContainerConfig is properly configured for test containers

The ContainerConfig class is well-structured and properly configured:

  • It's annotated with @TestConfiguration
  • Provides a PostgreSQL container bean with @ServiceConnection
  • Includes initialization script mounting for database setup
  • Uses the latest PostgreSQL 17.2-alpine image

The change from TestApplication to ContainerConfig represents an improvement in the test infrastructure by:

  • Following the single responsibility principle
  • Focusing solely on container configuration
  • Using Spring Boot's test container support effectively
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify ContainerConfig class exists and is properly configured
# Look for ContainerConfig class definition and its container setup
ast-grep --pattern 'class ContainerConfig {
  $$$
  @Bean
  $$$
  PostgreSQLContainer$$$
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 99


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the ContainerConfig class file
fd ContainerConfig.java

# Then let's look at its content
rg -l "class ContainerConfig" --type java

# Also search for any PostgreSQL container configuration
rg "PostgreSQLContainer" --type java -A 5

Length of output: 43091


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's look at the specific ContainerConfig class content for the jooq-r2dbc project
cat r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/common/ContainerConfig.java

# Also check if there was a TestApplication class that was replaced
fd TestApplication.java r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/

Length of output: 991

r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/pom.xml (2)

335-335: LGTM: Google Java Format version update

The update to Google Java Format 1.25.0 is a reasonable improvement. This version includes the latest style improvements and bug fixes.


217-217: Verify PostgreSQL 17.2 compatibility

The upgrade from PostgreSQL 16.x to 17.2 is a major version change. While using the latest version is good, we should ensure:

  1. All SQL features used in the application are compatible with PostgreSQL 17
  2. The upgrade path is documented
✅ Verification successful

PostgreSQL 17.2 upgrade is safe to proceed

The SQL migration files use standard PostgreSQL features that are well-supported across versions:

  • Basic DDL operations (CREATE TABLE)
  • UUID extension and functions
  • Standard data types (text, varchar, timestamptz)
  • Foreign key constraints
  • Default values and timestamps

No version-specific features or deprecated functionality is used that would be impacted by the upgrade from 16.x to 17.2.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for PostgreSQL version-specific features or potential incompatibilities
# Look for SQL migration files and their content
fd -e sql -d src/main/resources/db/migration/postgresql | while read -r file; do
  echo "=== Checking $file for PostgreSQL 17 compatibility ==="
  cat "$file"
done

Length of output: 230


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find any SQL files in the repository
fd -e sql

# Then check for any Flyway migration files or SQL scripts
fd migration

# Look for PostgreSQL-specific configuration or SQL files
rg -l "postgresql|postgres" --type-add 'props:*.properties' --type props

Length of output: 6978


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of PostgreSQL migration files in the r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample project
cat r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/resources/db/migration/postgresql/V1__01_init.sql

# Also check application properties for any PostgreSQL-specific configurations
cat r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/resources/application-local.properties

# Look for any PostgreSQL-specific code or configurations
rg -l "postgresql" r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/

Length of output: 1815

@rajadilipkolli rajadilipkolli merged commit 703a0d3 into main Dec 3, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@rajadilipkolli rajadilipkolli deleted the r2dbc branch December 3, 2024 16:27
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component: r2dbc type: dependency-upgrade Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant