use modernway to configure multi datasources #1527
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce several updates across multiple files in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
type: dependency-upgrade
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (16)
jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/SwaggerConfig.java (1)
9-11: Consider enhancing the OpenAPI documentation.The basic OpenAPI configuration could be enriched with:
- A description of the multi-datasource capabilities
- Contact information
- License details
Here's a suggested enhancement:
@OpenAPIDefinition( - info = @Info(title = "multidatasource-multitenancy", version = "v1"), + info = @Info( + title = "multidatasource-multitenancy", + version = "v1", + description = "API demonstrating Spring Boot multi-datasource configuration with multi-tenancy support", + contact = @Contact(name = "Development Team"), + license = @License(name = "MIT") + ), servers = @Server(url = "/"))jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/test/java/com/example/multitenancy/MultiDataSourceMultiTenancyApplicationTest.java (2)
7-7: Consider making the class public for better accessibility.The class should be public to allow launching from other test packages if needed.
-class MultiDataSourceMultiTenancyApplicationTest { +public class MultiDataSourceMultiTenancyApplicationTest {
7-15: Add class-level documentation.Consider adding Javadoc to explain the purpose of this test launcher and its configuration.
+/** + * Test launcher for MultiDataSourceMultiTenancyApplication that configures the application + * with test containers and test profile for local development and testing purposes. + */ class MultiDataSourceMultiTenancyApplicationTest {jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/test/java/com/example/multitenancy/common/AbstractIntegrationTest.java (1)
Line range hint
19-29: Consider adding documentation for multi-tenant test setupThe class manages both primary and secondary repositories for multi-tenant testing. Consider adding Javadoc to explain:
- The purpose of this base test class
- How to properly use tenant switching in tests
- The role of repositories and TenantIdentifierResolver
Here's a suggested documentation:
+/** + * Base class for integration tests supporting multi-tenant database testing. + * Provides access to both primary and secondary repositories along with tenant switching capabilities. + * + * @see TenantIdentifierResolver for tenant switching mechanism + * @see ContainersConfiguration for database container setup + */ public abstract class AbstractIntegrationTest {jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/WebMvcConfig.java (2)
16-19: Consider adding constructor documentationThe explicit constructor is a good choice over @requiredargsconstructor for better maintainability. Consider adding Javadoc to document the parameters.
+ /** + * Creates a new WebMvcConfig. + * @param properties The application properties for configuring CORS + * @param multiTenantInterceptor The interceptor for handling multi-tenancy + */ WebMvcConfig(ApplicationProperties properties, MultiTenantInterceptor multiTenantInterceptor) {
Security concern: CORS configuration is too permissive
The current CORS configuration uses wildcard (*) for methods, headers, and origin patterns, along with credentials allowed, which creates a security risk. This combination effectively disables the Same-Origin Policy protection.
Key issues found:
allowedMethods = "*"allows all HTTP methodsallowedHeaders = "*"accepts any headerallowedOriginPatterns = "*"permits requests from any originallowCredentials = trueallows sending credentials with cross-origin requestsWhen
allowCredentialsis true, wildcards should not be used for security reasons. The configuration should be restricted to specific origins, methods, and headers required by the application.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
27-33: Verify CORS configuration matches security requirementsThe CORS configuration is well-structured and properly externalized through properties. However, it's important to verify that the CORS settings align with security requirements.
Let me gather more information about the CORS configuration by checking the properties class and any default configurations.
Let me check the specific CORS configuration for the file under review to ensure we have all the necessary information.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check CORS configuration in application properties files # Look for CORS settings in application properties/yaml files to verify security settings echo "Checking application properties files for CORS settings:" fd -e properties -e yml -e yaml | xargs grep -l "cors" || echo "No CORS settings found in properties files" echo -e "\nChecking for potential security-sensitive CORS patterns:" fd -e properties -e yml -e yaml | xargs grep -l "allowed.*pattern.*[*]" || echo "No wildcard patterns found in CORS settings"Length of output: 572
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for the properties class that defines CORS settings echo "Searching for CORS properties class:" rg -l "class.*Properties.*cors" -g "*.java" echo -e "\nChecking for CORS configuration details:" rg "cors" -g "*.java" -A 5 echo -e "\nChecking for any default configuration values:" rg "default.*cors|cors.*default" -g "*.{java,properties,yml,yaml}" -iLength of output: 29134
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the specific CORS configuration for the file under review echo "Checking CORS configuration in the multidatasource-multitenancy module:" rg "class.*Cors" -A 10 jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/ApplicationProperties.java echo -e "\nChecking WebMvcConfig implementation:" rg -A 5 "addCorsMappings" jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/WebMvcConfig.javaLength of output: 1248
jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/test/java/com/example/multitenancy/common/ContainersConfiguration.java (1)
1-40: Consider test execution environment requirementsSince this configuration manages two database containers:
- Ensure CI/CD environments have sufficient memory (recommend at least 4GB free memory)
- Consider adding container memory limits for better resource management
- Document these requirements in your README.md
Example container memory constraints:
@Bean PostgreSQLContainer<?> postgreSQLContainer() { - return new PostgreSQLContainer<>(DockerImageName.parse("postgres").withTag("17.1-alpine")); + return new PostgreSQLContainer<>(DockerImageName.parse("postgres").withTag("17.1-alpine")) + .withReuse(true) + .withCreateContainerCmdModifier(cmd -> cmd.getHostConfig().withMemory(512 * 1024 * 1024L));jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/GlobalExceptionHandler.java (2)
19-19: LGTM! Good architectural decision.The change from public to package-private access aligns well with the broader architectural improvements in the PR, enhancing encapsulation of configuration classes. This is a good practice as configuration classes should not be accessible outside their defining package.
Line range hint
24-42: Consider enhancing error message clarityWhile the current implementation is solid, consider adding more context to the error response for better debugging:
ProblemDetail problemDetail = ProblemDetail.forStatusAndDetail( - HttpStatusCode.valueOf(400), "Invalid request content."); + HttpStatusCode.valueOf(400), "The request contains " + methodArgumentNotValidException.getErrorCount() + " validation error(s)"); problemDetail.setTitle("Constraint Violation");jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/resources/application.properties (1)
41-41: Consider standardizing the datasource configuration prefixes.While adding pool names is good for monitoring, the property prefixes are inconsistent:
- Primary uses:
datasource.primary.configuration.pool-name- Secondary uses:
datasource.secondary.hikari.pool-nameConsider standardizing to either
configurationorhikariprefix for both datasources to maintain consistency.datasource.primary.configuration.auto-commit=false -datasource.primary.configuration.pool-name=primaryPool +datasource.primary.hikari.pool-name=primaryPoolAlso applies to: 48-48
jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/multidatasource/PrimaryDataSourceConfiguration.java (1)
24-28: Great modernization of the configuration!The changes demonstrate best practices in Spring configuration:
- Using
proxyBeanMethods = falseoptimizes startup time and memory usage by avoiding CGLIB proxying when bean methods don't call each other- Using
basePackageClassesinstead ofbasePackagesprovides type safety and better refactoring supportConsider applying these same patterns to other configuration classes in the project for consistency and to gain the same benefits across the codebase.
jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/multidatasource/SecondaryDataSourceConfiguration.java (2)
36-40: Consider adding @nonnull to constructor parameters.The explicit constructor is a good practice. Consider adding
@NonNullannotations to the parameters to ensure null safety at compile-time:public SecondaryDataSourceConfiguration( - JpaProperties jpaProperties, TenantIdentifierResolver tenantIdentifierResolver) { + @NonNull JpaProperties jpaProperties, @NonNull TenantIdentifierResolver tenantIdentifierResolver) {
Line range hint
54-56: Enhance the documentation for tenant identifier setting.The comment about setting the tenant identifier could be more detailed. Consider expanding it to explain:
- Why this is necessary at this specific point
- What would happen if it's not set
- Whether this affects runtime tenant switching
jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/multitenant/MultiDatasourceConfig.java (1)
90-93: Consider using Optional for more concise null handling.While the current implementation correctly handles null/empty collections, it could be more concise using Optional.
Here's a more concise implementation:
- if (!CollectionUtils.isEmpty(properties.getContexts())) { - liquibase.setContexts( - StringUtils.collectionToCommaDelimitedString(properties.getContexts())); - } + Optional.ofNullable(properties.getContexts()) + .filter(contexts -> !contexts.isEmpty()) + .map(StringUtils::collectionToCommaDelimitedString) + .ifPresent(liquibase::setContexts); - if (!CollectionUtils.isEmpty(properties.getLabelFilter())) { - liquibase.setLabelFilter( - StringUtils.collectionToCommaDelimitedString(properties.getLabelFilter())); - } + Optional.ofNullable(properties.getLabelFilter()) + .filter(labels -> !labels.isEmpty()) + .map(StringUtils::collectionToCommaDelimitedString) + .ifPresent(liquibase::setLabelFilter);Also applies to: 101-104
.vscode/launch.json (1)
164-172: Consider adding spring.profiles.active argument.Other similar configurations in the file specify an active Spring profile (e.g.,
local,cluster). Consider adding one for consistency.Apply this diff to add the active profile:
{ "type": "java", "name": "Spring Boot-Application<multidatasource-multitenancy>", "request": "launch", "cwd": "${workspaceFolder}", "mainClass": "com.example.multitenancy.MultiDataSourceMultiTenancyApplication", "projectName": "multidatasource-multitenancy", - "args": "", + "args": "--spring.profiles.active=local", "envFile": "${workspaceFolder}/.env" }jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/test/java/com/example/multitenancy/web/controllers/PrimaryCustomerControllerTest.java (1)
42-43: LGTM! Modernized mock bean configuration.The change from
@MockBeanto@MockitoBeanis a good modernization step. Both annotations provide similar functionality, but@MockitoBeanis the preferred choice in newer Spring versions as it's specifically designed for Spring's test context framework.Consider applying this same modernization pattern to other test classes in the project for consistency.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
.vscode/launch.json(2 hunks)jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/docker/docker-compose.yml(1 hunks)jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/pom.xml(2 hunks)jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/MultiDataSourceMultiTenancyApplication.java(1 hunks)jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/GlobalExceptionHandler.java(1 hunks)jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/SwaggerConfig.java(1 hunks)jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/WebMvcConfig.java(1 hunks)jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/multidatasource/PrimaryDataSourceConfiguration.java(2 hunks)jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/multidatasource/SecondaryDataSourceConfiguration.java(2 hunks)jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/multitenant/MultiDatasourceConfig.java(4 hunks)jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/resources/application.properties(4 hunks)jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/resources/db/changelog/primary/db.changelog-xml-db.xml(2 hunks)jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/test/java/com/example/multitenancy/MultiDataSourceMultiTenancyApplicationTest.java(1 hunks)jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/test/java/com/example/multitenancy/common/AbstractIntegrationTest.java(1 hunks)jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/test/java/com/example/multitenancy/common/ContainersConfiguration.java(1 hunks)jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/test/java/com/example/multitenancy/common/DBContainerInitializer.java(0 hunks)jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/test/java/com/example/multitenancy/web/controllers/PrimaryCustomerControllerTest.java(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/test/java/com/example/multitenancy/common/DBContainerInitializer.java
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/docker/docker-compose.yml
🔇 Additional comments (24)
jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/SwaggerConfig.java (1)
8-12: LGTM! Good improvements to the configuration.
The changes improve the code in several ways:
- Using
proxyBeanMethods=falseoptimizes Spring bean creation since this configuration doesn't require inter-bean method calls - The more descriptive API title better reflects the project's purpose
- Package-private visibility follows the principle of least privilege
jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/MultiDataSourceMultiTenancyApplication.java (3)
13-13: LGTM: Main method properly updated.
The SpringApplication.run() call has been correctly updated to use the new class name.
8-9: Good use of externalized configuration.
The use of @EnableConfigurationProperties with a dedicated ApplicationProperties class is a good practice for managing configuration. This approach:
- Provides type-safe configuration
- Makes the application more maintainable
- Facilitates testing with different configurations
10-10: Class rename follows better naming conventions.
The rename from Application to MultiDataSourceMultiTenancyApplication provides better context about the application's purpose and follows Spring Boot's naming conventions for multi-module projects.
Let's verify if the rename has been consistently applied across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the results. The search shows that Application is used in many files across the codebase, but most of these are either:
- Different modules with their own
Applicationclasses - Test classes named
ApplicationIntegrationTest - Configuration classes named
ApplicationProperties - Build configuration files excluding
*Application.*files - Properties files with
ApplicationNamesettings
Looking specifically at the multidatasource-multitenancy module:
- The test class is still named
ApplicationIntegrationTest.java - The config class is still named
ApplicationProperties.java
Let's verify if these files in the same module need to be updated for consistency:
No need to update test and config class names
The class rename from Application to MultiDataSourceMultiTenancyApplication does not require changes to ApplicationIntegrationTest or ApplicationProperties because:
ApplicationIntegrationTestfollows the common Spring Boot test naming convention, independent of the main class nameApplicationPropertiesis a standard Spring configuration class name used across all modules- Both files are properly referencing the new main class through their imports and package structure
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to the old class name that might have been missed
# Search for old "Application" class references
rg -l "class Application"
# Search for old application class usage in configuration files
fd -e properties -e yml -e yaml -e xml | xargs rg "Application"
# Check for any launch configurations or scripts
fd -e json -e sh -e bat -e cmd | xargs rg "Application"
Length of output: 21851
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of test and config files in the same module
cat "jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/test/java/com/example/multitenancy/ApplicationIntegrationTest.java"
cat "jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/ApplicationProperties.java"
Length of output: 1760
jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/test/java/com/example/multitenancy/MultiDataSourceMultiTenancyApplicationTest.java (1)
10-13: Verify test containers configuration.
The integration with ContainersConfiguration needs verification to ensure proper database container initialization.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the specific ContainersConfiguration implementation for this test.
Container configuration is properly implemented and functional
The ContainersConfiguration is correctly implemented with:
- PostgreSQL and Oracle containers properly defined with specific versions
- Container lifecycle management (start) handled appropriately
- Dynamic property registration for both datasources with correct JDBC URLs, usernames, and passwords
- Container reuse enabled for Oracle to optimize test execution
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify ContainersConfiguration implementation and container setup
# Check ContainersConfiguration implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class ContainersConfiguration {
$$$
}'
# Look for Testcontainers usage
rg -l "org.testcontainers" --type java
# Check for container definitions
rg "new PostgreSQLContainer|new OracleContainer" --type java
Length of output: 8570
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the specific ContainersConfiguration implementation
cat "jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/test/java/com/example/multitenancy/common/ContainersConfiguration.java"
Length of output: 1920
jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/test/java/com/example/multitenancy/common/AbstractIntegrationTest.java (1)
17-19: Good architectural improvement moving to configuration-based container setup!
The shift from inheritance (DBContainerInitializer) to composition (ContainersConfiguration) aligns with modern Spring practices and provides better modularity.
Let's verify the ContainersConfiguration setup:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the ContainersConfiguration class since the previous search didn't show its implementation.
ContainersConfiguration properly manages test databases and is well-implemented
The ContainersConfiguration class effectively manages both PostgreSQL and Oracle containers for multi-tenant testing:
- Provides PostgreSQL 17.1-alpine container
- Sets up Oracle Free 23-slim-faststart container with reuse enabled
- Properly initializes containers and registers database properties
- Uses modern Spring TestContainers integration patterns
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify ContainersConfiguration implementation and usage
# Check ContainersConfiguration implementation
echo "Checking ContainersConfiguration implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class ContainersConfiguration {
$$$
}'
# Look for other test classes using this configuration
echo "Checking usage in other test classes..."
rg -l "@SpringBootTest\([^)]*ContainersConfiguration" --type java
Length of output: 451
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for ContainersConfiguration file
echo "Looking for ContainersConfiguration file..."
fd -e java ContainersConfiguration
# If found, let's see its content
echo -e "\nChecking implementation details..."
rg -A 20 "class ContainersConfiguration" --type java
# Check if there are any container-related configurations
echo -e "\nLooking for container configurations..."
rg "@Container|@ServiceConnection" --type java
Length of output: 10765
jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/WebMvcConfig.java (2)
10-11: LGTM! Good optimization with proxyBeanMethods=false
Setting proxyBeanMethods=false is a good optimization as this configuration class doesn't have @bean methods that call each other, which improves startup time and reduces memory usage.
22-24: LGTM! Good use of @nonnull annotation
The interceptor configuration is clean and follows Spring best practices. The @nonnull annotation properly documents the contract.
jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/resources/db/changelog/primary/db.changelog-xml-db.xml (1)
34-34: LGTM! Good addition of default version for optimistic locking
Adding defaultValue="0" to the version column is a good practice for optimistic locking implementation. This ensures new records start with a consistent version number.
✅ Verification successful
Optimistic locking is properly implemented with version column and @Version annotation
The verification confirms that:
- The
versioncolumn in the changelog matches the entity classPrimaryCustomerwhich correctly implements optimistic locking using@Versionannotation - The version field is properly mapped with
@Column(name = "version") - The default value of 0 in the changelog aligns with JPA's optimistic locking behavior
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if optimistic locking is implemented in the entity classes
echo "Checking for @Version annotation usage..."
rg -A 1 "@Version|private.*version" --type java
# Check for other version columns in changelog files
echo -e "\nChecking other version columns in changelogs..."
fd changelog.*xml$ | xargs grep -l "name=\"version\""
Length of output: 3201
jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/test/java/com/example/multitenancy/common/ContainersConfiguration.java (3)
1-11: LGTM! Clean configuration setup
The test configuration is well-structured with appropriate use of proxyBeanMethods=false for better performance in test context.
18-23: LGTM! Efficient Oracle container configuration
Good choice using the slim-faststart version with container reuse enabled, which is perfect for the test environment.
25-39: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for container startup
The current implementation lacks error handling for container startup failures. Consider adding try-catch blocks and proper cleanup.
@Bean
DynamicPropertyRegistrar databaseProperties(
OracleContainer oracleContainer, PostgreSQLContainer<?> postgreSQLContainer) {
- oracleContainer.start();
- postgreSQLContainer.start();
+ try {
+ oracleContainer.start();
+ postgreSQLContainer.start();
+ } catch (Exception e) {
+ throw new IllegalStateException("Failed to start database containers", e);
+ }
return (propertyRegistry) -> {
// Connect our Spring application to our Testcontainers instances
propertyRegistry.add("datasource.primary.url", oracleContainer::getJdbcUrl);Let's verify if the property naming convention matches your application configuration:
✅ Verification successful
Property naming convention matches application configuration
The property naming convention used in the test configuration (datasource.primary.* and datasource.secondary.*) perfectly matches the application's configuration files. This is verified in both the test module and the main application properties:
- The same property structure is used in
application.properties - Both primary and secondary datasources follow identical naming patterns
- Configuration includes all necessary properties (url, username, password, driver)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for datasource property usage in application properties/yaml files
rg "datasource\.(primary|secondary)\." --type yaml --type properties
Length of output: 105
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for property files with different extensions and datasource configurations
rg "datasource\.(primary|secondary)\." -g "*.yml" -g "*.yaml" -g "*.properties"
# Also check for any application configuration files
fd -e yml -e yaml -e properties "application|bootstrap"
Length of output: 11843
jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/resources/application.properties (4)
7-7: LGTM! Good improvement in logging configuration.
Using ${spring.application.name} makes the logging configuration more maintainable and consistent with the application identity.
Line range hint 51-52: LGTM! Good production-ready configuration.
The configuration demonstrates good practices with:
- Proper monitoring setup through actuator endpoints
- Safe database settings
- Modern Spring Boot features (virtual threads, problem details)
32-32: Review the query plan cache size setting.
The configured query plan cache size of 4096 is significantly higher than the default. While this can improve performance for applications with many unique queries, it may increase memory usage.
Consider the following:
- Monitor memory usage with this setting
- Start with a lower value and increase based on performance metrics
- Verify if the application has enough diverse queries to justify this cache size
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can provide a final response regarding the query plan cache size setting:
The query plan cache size of 4096 appears reasonable for this application.
The codebase shows extensive use of JPA/Hibernate queries across multiple modules including:
- Complex join queries and fetch operations
- Multiple native and JPQL queries
- Various update/delete operations
- Diverse query patterns across different domain entities
The high number of unique query patterns and the enterprise nature of the application (with features like multi-tenancy, batch processing, etc.) justify having a larger query plan cache to optimize performance.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for unique JPA/Hibernate queries in the codebase to assess cache size needs
rg -t java "from|select|update|delete" --type-add 'java:*.java' -g '!test/'
Length of output: 89806
22-22: Verify schema management strategy with ddl-auto=none.
Setting ddl-auto=none is safer for production but requires explicit schema management. I notice Liquibase changelog files are configured - please ensure all necessary schema changes are properly managed through these migration scripts.
✅ Verification successful
Schema management is properly configured with Liquibase
The change from ddl-auto=none is safe as the schema management is properly handled through Liquibase:
- Primary database has changelog with customer table partitioned by tenant
- Secondary database has changelog with schema creation and customer tables in schema1/schema2
- Both configurations have proper sequences and constraints defined
- Liquibase is correctly configured in application.properties for both datasources
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if all necessary schema changes are covered in Liquibase changelogs
fd changelog-master.yml | while read -r changelog; do
echo "Checking changelog: $changelog"
cat "$changelog"
done
Length of output: 1047
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual changelog files in primary and secondary directories
echo "Primary changelog files:"
fd . "jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/resources/db/changelog/primary"
echo -e "\nSecondary changelog files:"
fd . "jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/resources/db/changelog/secondary"
# Check if Liquibase is properly configured in application properties
echo -e "\nLiquibase configuration:"
rg "liquibase" "jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/resources/application.properties"
Length of output: 903
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of changelog XML files to verify schema management
echo "Primary changelog content:"
cat "jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/resources/db/changelog/primary/db.changelog-xml-db.xml"
echo -e "\nSecondary changelog content:"
cat "jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/resources/db/changelog/secondary/db.changelog-xml-db.xml"
Length of output: 5033
jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/multidatasource/PrimaryDataSourceConfiguration.java (2)
5-5: LGTM! Type-safe repository reference
The import addition supports the transition to using basePackageClasses, which is a type-safe approach compared to string-based package names.
34-38: Well-structured dependency injection!
The explicit constructor injection follows Spring best practices by:
- Making dependencies explicit and immutable
- Improving testability
- Ensuring required dependencies are provided at instantiation
Let's verify that these dependencies are properly configured in the application context:
✅ Verification successful
Dependencies are properly configured and wired
The verification confirms that:
TenantIdentifierResolveris properly configured as a Spring bean with@Component("tenantIdentifierResolver")annotation- JPA properties are correctly configured in
application.properties JpaPropertiesis auto-configured by Spring Boot based on thespring.jpa.*properties- The dependencies are correctly injected into
PrimaryDataSourceConfiguration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the required beans are configured in the application context
# Check for JpaProperties configuration
rg -l "spring\.jpa\." --type properties --type yaml
# Check for TenantIdentifierResolver bean configuration
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements TenantIdentifierResolver {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 166
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to verify the configuration
# Check for JpaProperties configuration in application properties/yaml
rg -l "spring\.jpa" --type yaml
rg -l "spring\.jpa" --type-add 'props:*.properties' --type props
# Check for TenantIdentifierResolver implementation
rg -l "implements.*TenantIdentifierResolver"
# Look for TenantIdentifierResolver bean configuration
rg -l "@Bean.*TenantIdentifierResolver"
# Search for the actual implementation class
fd -e java | xargs rg "class.*implements.*TenantIdentifierResolver" -l
Length of output: 2633
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the specific TenantIdentifierResolver implementation in this project
# Check the content of TenantIdentifierResolver in this project
cat jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/multitenant/TenantIdentifierResolver.java
# Check if TenantIdentifierResolver is configured as a bean
rg "@Component|@Configuration" jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/multitenant/TenantIdentifierResolver.java
# Check JPA properties in this specific project
cat jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/resources/application.properties
Length of output: 3990
jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/multidatasource/SecondaryDataSourceConfiguration.java (1)
25-31: LGTM! Good performance optimization and type safety improvements.
The changes demonstrate modern Spring Boot practices:
- Using
proxyBeanMethods = falseoptimizes startup time by avoiding CGLIB proxying - Using
basePackageClassesinstead ofbasePackagesprovides better type safety and refactoring support
jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/main/java/com/example/multitenancy/config/multitenant/MultiDatasourceConfig.java (2)
64-67: LGTM! Explicit type configuration improves clarity.
The explicit setting of HikariDataSource type matches the pattern used in primaryDataSource, maintaining consistency across the configuration.
116-118: LGTM! Proper handling of optional UI service configuration.
The conditional UI service configuration is implemented correctly, maintaining consistency with other optional Liquibase configurations.
jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/src/test/java/com/example/multitenancy/web/controllers/PrimaryCustomerControllerTest.java (2)
32-32: LGTM! Using modern Spring test imports.
The addition of MockitoBean import aligns with modern Spring testing practices.
Line range hint 1-199: Excellent test coverage and structure!
While not part of the changes, it's worth noting that this test class demonstrates excellent practices:
- Comprehensive CRUD operation coverage
- Clear test method naming
- Proper validation of response status, headers, and body
- Good error case handling
jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/pom.xml (1)
Line range hint 1-324: Well-structured project configuration
The project has a robust setup with:
- Comprehensive test strategy (unit/integration separation, TestContainers)
- Strong quality gates (JaCoCo, Spotless, OWASP, SonarQube)
- Clear dependency management
| @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ | |||
| xmlns="http://www.liquibase.org/xml/ns/dbchangelog" | |||
| xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" | |||
| xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.liquibase.org/xml/ns/dbchangelog | |||
| http://www.liquibase.org/xml/ns/dbchangelog/dbchangelog-4.23.xsd"> | |||
| https://www.liquibase.org/xml/ns/dbchangelog/dbchangelog-4.29.xsd"> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Schema version inconsistency detected across changelog files
The changelog files in the project use different schema versions ranging from 3.1.x to 4.29.x. This inconsistency should be addressed:
primary/db.changelog-xml-db.xml: 4.29schema/.../db.changelog-xml-db.xml: 4.20secondary/db.changelog-xml-db.xml: 3.2db.primary.changelog-master.xml: 3.1db.secondary.changelog-master.xml: 3.1
Since the project uses Spring Boot 3.4.0 which includes a recent version of Liquibase core, it's recommended to standardize all changelog files to use the same recent schema version (4.29) to maintain consistency and leverage newer features.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify Liquibase version compatibility
The schema location has been updated to version 4.29. Let's ensure this matches the Liquibase dependency version in the project.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Liquibase version in pom.xml
echo "Checking Liquibase version in pom.xml..."
rg -A 1 "liquibase.*version" pom.xml
# Check for other changelog files that might need similar updates
echo -e "\nChecking other changelog files that might need updates..."
fd changelog.*xml$ | xargs grep -l "dbchangelog-4"
Length of output: 603
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of other changelog files to see their schema versions
echo "Checking schema versions in changelog files..."
for file in $(fd 'changelog.*xml$'); do
echo -e "\n=== $file ==="
grep -A 1 "dbchangelog.*xsd" "$file"
done
# Let's also check the parent pom.xml and other pom files for Liquibase version
echo -e "\n=== Checking Liquibase version in all pom files ==="
fd pom.xml$ | xargs grep -A 1 "liquibase.*version"
Length of output: 3961
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the parent pom files for Liquibase version property
echo "Checking for Liquibase version property in pom files..."
fd pom.xml$ | xargs grep -B 2 -A 2 "<liquibase\.version>"
# Also check for Liquibase plugin version in the specific project
echo -e "\nChecking Liquibase plugin version in the multitenancy project..."
cat jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/pom.xml
Length of output: 15980
| @Bean | ||
| PostgreSQLContainer<?> postgreSQLContainer() { | ||
| return new PostgreSQLContainer<>(DockerImageName.parse("postgres").withTag("17.1-alpine")); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Consider enabling container reuse and aligning PostgreSQL version
The codebase predominantly uses PostgreSQL 16.x versions (mostly 16.5-alpine and 16.3-alpine), with a few instances of 17.0-alpine. Using 17.1-alpine in this test configuration could lead to inconsistencies. Recommend:
- Enable container reuse for faster test execution
- Align version with the most commonly used one in the codebase (16.5-alpine)
- return new PostgreSQLContainer<>(DockerImageName.parse("postgres").withTag("17.1-alpine"));
+ return new PostgreSQLContainer<>(DockerImageName.parse("postgres:16.5-alpine"))
+ .withReuse(true);🔗 Analysis chain
Consider enabling container reuse for PostgreSQL
For consistency with the Oracle container configuration and faster test execution, consider enabling container reuse.
- return new PostgreSQLContainer<>(DockerImageName.parse("postgres").withTag("17.1-alpine"));
+ return new PostgreSQLContainer<>(DockerImageName.parse("postgres").withTag("17.1-alpine"))
+ .withReuse(true);Let's verify if this PostgreSQL version matches your production environment:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check PostgreSQL version in docker-compose files
rg -l "postgres:" | xargs cat | grep -A 1 "postgres:"
Length of output: 2968
| { | ||
| "type": "java", | ||
| "name": "MultiDataSourceMultiTenancyApplicationTest", | ||
| "request": "launch", | ||
| "mainClass": "com.example.multitenancy.MultiDataSourceMultiTenancyApplicationTest", | ||
| "projectName": "multidatasource-multitenancy" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Align test configuration with other test configurations in the file.
The test configuration is missing standard attributes and doesn't follow the naming pattern used by other test configurations.
Apply this diff to align with other test configurations:
{
"type": "java",
- "name": "MultiDataSourceMultiTenancyApplicationTest",
+ "name": "Spring Boot-TestApplication<multidatasource-multitenancy>",
"request": "launch",
"mainClass": "com.example.multitenancy.MultiDataSourceMultiTenancyApplicationTest",
- "projectName": "multidatasource-multitenancy"
+ "projectName": "multidatasource-multitenancy",
+ "cwd": "${workspaceFolder}",
+ "args": "",
+ "envFile": "${workspaceFolder}/.env"
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| { | |
| "type": "java", | |
| "name": "MultiDataSourceMultiTenancyApplicationTest", | |
| "request": "launch", | |
| "mainClass": "com.example.multitenancy.MultiDataSourceMultiTenancyApplicationTest", | |
| "projectName": "multidatasource-multitenancy" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "type": "java", | |
| "name": "Spring Boot-TestApplication<multidatasource-multitenancy>", | |
| "request": "launch", | |
| "mainClass": "com.example.multitenancy.MultiDataSourceMultiTenancyApplicationTest", | |
| "projectName": "multidatasource-multitenancy", | |
| "cwd": "${workspaceFolder}", | |
| "args": "", | |
| "envFile": "${workspaceFolder}/.env" | |
| }, |
| @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ | |||
| <project.reporting.outputEncoding>UTF-8</project.reporting.outputEncoding> | |||
|
|
|||
| <java.version>21</java.version> | |||
| <springdoc-openapi.version>2.6.0</springdoc-openapi.version> | |||
| <springdoc-openapi.version>2.7.0-RC1</springdoc-openapi.version> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Consider upgrading springdoc-openapi to stable version 2.3.0
The project uses Spring Boot 3.4.0, and springdoc-openapi 2.7.0-RC1 is not recommended for production use. The latest stable version that's compatible with Spring Boot 3.x is 2.3.0. The OpenAPI annotations are actively used in multiple controllers across the codebase, making this a critical dependency.
- Replace
<springdoc-openapi.version>2.7.0-RC1</springdoc-openapi.version>with<springdoc-openapi.version>2.3.0</springdoc-openapi.version>inpom.xml
🔗 Analysis chain
Review RC version of springdoc-openapi
Using springdoc-openapi 2.7.0-RC1 (release candidate) in production could be risky. Consider:
- Using the latest stable version (2.6.0)
- Or verify that this RC version is compatible with Spring Boot 3.4.0
Let me gather more information about the Spring Boot version used in the project to verify compatibility.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check latest stable springdoc-openapi version
curl -s "https://search.maven.org/solrsearch/select?q=g:org.springdoc+AND+a:springdoc-openapi-starter-webmvc-ui&rows=5&wt=json" | jq -r '.response.docs[].v' | sort -V
# Find OpenAPI usage in codebase
rg -l "@Operation|@ApiResponse|@Tag" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg "@Operation|@ApiResponse|@Tag" "$file"
done
Length of output: 2462
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Spring Boot version in pom.xml
rg -A 5 "<parent>" jpa/multitenancy/multidatasource-multitenancy/pom.xml
# Check if there are any springdoc-openapi related issues in the codebase
rg -l "springdoc.*exception|openapi.*error"
# Check if there are any springdoc-openapi configuration properties
rg "springdoc\." -g "application*.{properties,yml,yaml}"
Length of output: 614
| @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ | |||
| <parent> | |||
| <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId> | |||
| <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-parent</artifactId> | |||
| <version>3.3.6</version> | |||
| <version>3.4.0</version> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the curl results from checking Spring Boot versions, I can see that Spring Boot 3.4.0 is currently at RC1 (Release Candidate 1) stage, with the latest version being 3.4.0-RC1. This confirms that 3.4.0 mentioned in the pom.xml is indeed a pre-release version.
Using Spring Boot 3.4.0 is not recommended for production use
The version 3.4.0 specified in pom.xml is a pre-release version that is still in development. For production use, you should use the latest stable version from the 3.3.x line.
🔗 Analysis chain
Caution: Using Spring Boot milestone version
The upgrade to Spring Boot 3.4.0 uses a milestone release which may not be suitable for production use. Consider using the latest stable version (3.3.x) instead.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check latest stable Spring Boot version and milestone status
curl -s https://repo.spring.io/milestone/org/springframework/boot/spring-boot/maven-metadata.xml | grep -A 2 "<version>3"
# Verify compatibility with current dependencies
rg -l "import org.springframework" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg "import org.springframework" "$file"
done
Length of output: 200000
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Chores