feat : upgrade to springboot 3.4 #1480
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
type: dependency-upgrade
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
httpClients/boot-restclient/src/main/java/com/example/restclient/bootrestclient/config/ClientLoggerRequestInterceptor.java (4)
47-59: Optimize logging format for readabilityThe use of long delimiter lines in logs can clutter the logging output and make it harder to read. Simplifying or removing excessive delimiters can improve log readability.
Consider adjusting the delimiter lines:
- log.info( - "===========================request begin================================================"); + log.info("=== Request Begin ==="); ... - log.info( - "==========================request end================================================"); + log.info("=== Request End ===");
61-64: Log headers in a consolidated formatLogging each header individually can produce excessive log entries. Consolidating headers into a single log statement can make logs cleaner.
Consider logging headers as a single map:
- log.info("Headers : "); - headers.forEach((name, values) -> values.forEach(value -> log.info("{}={}", name, value))); + log.info("Headers : {}", headers);
18-105: Add JavaDoc comments to improve maintainabilityAdding JavaDoc comments to public classes and methods enhances code readability and helps other developers understand the purpose and usage of the code.
Consider adding JavaDoc comments to the class and its public methods.
20-20: Use parameterized logging instead of string concatenationEnsure that all logging statements use parameterized logging to prevent unnecessary string concatenation when the log level is not enabled.
Verify that all
log.infostatements are using placeholders{}with parameters, which is already correctly implemented.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
httpClients/boot-restclient/pom.xml(2 hunks)httpClients/boot-restclient/src/main/java/com/example/restclient/bootrestclient/config/ClientLoggerRequestInterceptor.java(1 hunks)httpClients/boot-restclient/src/main/java/com/example/restclient/bootrestclient/config/RestClientConfiguration.java(2 hunks)httpClients/boot-restclient/src/main/resources/application.properties(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
httpClients/boot-restclient/src/main/resources/application.properties (2)
8-8: LGTM! Good choice using the JDK HTTP client.
The configuration aligns well with Spring Boot 3.4's recommended approach of using the JDK HTTP client.
9-10: Consider environment-specific timeout configurations.
While the timeout values are reasonable for development:
- Connect timeout of 30s might be too long for production environments
- Read timeout of 1m could be excessive for simple API calls
Consider defining different timeout values for different environments (dev/staging/prod) or specific endpoints.
Let's check if there are any environment-specific property files:
Recommendations:
- For production, consider shorter timeouts (e.g., connect: 5s, read: 30s)
- For critical endpoints, consider creating separate RestClient beans with custom timeouts
- Document the timeout values in your operational runbook
httpClients/boot-restclient/pom.xml (2)
75-75: LGTM: Google Java Format version update
The update to Google Java Format 1.24.0 is a safe improvement that brings the latest formatting rules and improvements.
8-8: Caution: Using Spring Boot RC version in production
The upgrade to Spring Boot 3.4.0-RC1 introduces potential risks as Release Candidate versions are not recommended for production use. Consider the following:
- RC versions may contain breaking changes
- Limited community testing and feedback
- Potential compatibility issues with existing dependencies
Consider staying on the latest stable version (3.3.5) for production environments or ensure thorough testing if proceeding with the RC version.
Let's verify dependency compatibility:
httpClients/boot-restclient/src/main/java/com/example/restclient/bootrestclient/config/RestClientConfiguration.java (2)
38-38: Integration of ClientLoggerRequestInterceptor is correct
The addition of .requestInterceptor(clientLoggerRequestInterceptor) properly integrates the custom interceptor into the RestClient configuration, enhancing HTTP request logging.
26-26: Ensure ClientLoggerRequestInterceptor is a Spring Bean
Please confirm that ClientLoggerRequestInterceptor is properly declared as a Spring-managed bean. It should be annotated with @Component, @Service, or defined as a @Bean in a configuration class to enable dependency injection into restClientCustomizer.
Run the following script to verify:
✅ Verification successful
ClientLoggerRequestInterceptor is properly configured as a Spring Bean
The class is correctly annotated with @Component, making it a Spring-managed bean that can be autowired into RestClientConfiguration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that ClientLoggerRequestInterceptor is declared as a Spring Bean.
# Search for the class file
fd 'ClientLoggerRequestInterceptor.java' | while read file; do
# Check for Spring annotations in the class
rg '@(Component|Service|Configuration)' "$file" && echo "Found Spring annotation in $file"
done
# Alternatively, check for @Bean methods returning ClientLoggerRequestInterceptor
rg '@Bean' -A 2 --type java | rg 'ClientLoggerRequestInterceptor'
Length of output: 613
| byte[] responseBody = response.getBody().readAllBytes(); | ||
| if (responseBody.length > 0) { | ||
| log.info("Response body: {}", new String(responseBody, StandardCharsets.UTF_8)); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential memory issues with large response bodies
Reading the entire response body into memory using readAllBytes() can lead to OutOfMemoryError if the response is large. This may affect the application's performance and stability.
Consider limiting the size of the response body that is read and logged, or stream the response body instead of loading it entirely into memory.
| log.info("Status code : {}", response.getStatusCode()); | ||
| log.info("Status text : {}", response.getStatusText()); | ||
| logHeaders(response.getHeaders()); | ||
| byte[] responseBody = response.getBody().readAllBytes(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure response body stream is not consumed
Calling response.getBody().readAllBytes() consumes the input stream, which may cause issues for downstream processing that expects to read from the response body.
To prevent consuming the response body stream, consider wrapping the response without reading and consuming the stream upfront.
| logHeaders(response.getHeaders()); | ||
| byte[] responseBody = response.getBody().readAllBytes(); | ||
| if (responseBody.length > 0) { | ||
| log.info("Response body: {}", new String(responseBody, StandardCharsets.UTF_8)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid logging sensitive information in response bodies
Logging the response body can expose sensitive data returned by the server. This poses a security risk if the logs are compromised.
Apply this diff to remove logging of the response body:
- if (responseBody.length > 0) {
- log.info("Response body: {}", new String(responseBody, StandardCharsets.UTF_8));
- }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| log.info("Method : {}", request.getMethod()); | ||
| logHeaders(request.getHeaders()); | ||
| if (body.length > 0) { | ||
| log.info("Request body: {}", new String(body, StandardCharsets.UTF_8)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid logging sensitive information in request bodies
Logging the request body may expose sensitive data such as credentials or personal information. It's a security risk to log request bodies without sanitization.
Apply this diff to remove logging of the request body:
- if (body.length > 0) {
- log.info("Request body: {}", new String(body, StandardCharsets.UTF_8));
- }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| public BufferingClientHttpResponseWrapper(ClientHttpResponse response, byte[] body) { | ||
| this.response = response; | ||
| this.body = body; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reuse existing classes for response buffering
Spring provides a BufferingClientHttpResponseWrapper class that can be used instead of implementing a custom wrapper. This reduces code duplication and leverages existing, well-tested functionality.
Consider replacing the custom BufferingClientHttpResponseWrapper with Spring's existing class.
Apply this diff:
- private static class BufferingClientHttpResponseWrapper implements ClientHttpResponse {
- // Custom implementation
- }
+ // Remove custom wrapper and use Spring's BufferingClientHttpResponseWrapperAnd modify the logResponse method accordingly.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@coderabbitai, Spring's BufferingClientHttpResponseWrapper is not a public class, how to replace custom code with Spring's BufferingClientHttpResponseWrapper?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@rajadilipkolli, thank you for pointing that out. You are correct that Spring's BufferingClientHttpResponseWrapper is not a public class and cannot be used directly. In this case, your custom implementation is appropriate.
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: rajadilipkolli
PR: rajadilipkolli/my-spring-boot-experiments#1480
File: httpClients/boot-restclient/src/main/java/com/example/restclient/bootrestclient/config/ClientLoggerRequestInterceptor.java:70-73
Timestamp: 2024-11-01T10:48:43.983Z
Learning: Spring's `BufferingClientHttpResponseWrapper` is not public and cannot be used directly outside of the `org.springframework.http` package. Therefore, custom implementations are necessary when response buffering is needed in `ClientHttpResponse` interceptors.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
httpClients/boot-restclient/src/main/resources/META-INF/additional-spring-configuration-metadata.json (1)
4-7: Enhance property documentation with additional metadata.The current description could be more comprehensive to help users configure the property correctly.
Consider adding more detailed metadata:
{ "name": "application.external-call-url", "type": "java.lang.String", - "description": "URL to which call should be made." + "description": "Base URL for external service calls. Must be a valid URL including the scheme (e.g., 'https://api.example.com').", + "defaultValue": "http://localhost:8080", + "validation": { + "pattern": "^(http|https)://[^\\s/$.?#].[^\\s]*$" + } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
httpClients/boot-restclient/src/main/java/com/example/restclient/bootrestclient/config/ClientLoggerRequestInterceptor.java(1 hunks)httpClients/boot-restclient/src/main/resources/META-INF/additional-spring-configuration-metadata.json(1 hunks)httpClients/boot-restclient/src/test/java/com/example/restclient/bootrestclient/services/PostServiceTest.java(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- httpClients/boot-restclient/src/main/java/com/example/restclient/bootrestclient/config/ClientLoggerRequestInterceptor.java
🔇 Additional comments (4)
httpClients/boot-restclient/src/main/resources/META-INF/additional-spring-configuration-metadata.json (1)
1-9: LGTM! Configuration metadata structure is correct.
The JSON structure follows Spring Boot's configuration metadata schema correctly, and the property is well-defined with appropriate type information.
httpClients/boot-restclient/src/test/java/com/example/restclient/bootrestclient/services/PostServiceTest.java (3)
4-6: LGTM! Import changes improve code clarity.
The change from wildcard imports to explicit imports for MockRestRequestMatchers methods enhances code readability and maintainability.
Also applies to: 9-9
Line range hint 31-56: LGTM! Test implementation remains compatible with Spring Boot 3.4.
The test method implementation using MockRestServiceServer and assertions are well-structured and compatible with the Spring Boot upgrade.
24-29: Verify test context initialization order.
While the addition of ClientLoggerRequestInterceptor is appropriate, please verify that:
- The initialization order of components is correct (especially since
RestClientConfigurationmight need to be initialized before the interceptor) - All required components for the test context are included
Let's check the component dependencies:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the test context initialization order:
The component initialization order is correct and all required components are included
The verification shows that:
ClientLoggerRequestInterceptoris a simple@Componentthat implementsClientHttpRequestInterceptorfor logging purposesRestClientConfigurationis properly configured withproxyBeanMethods = falseand injects the interceptor as a dependency in itsrestClientCustomizerbean- The test context includes all necessary components in a logical order:
- PostService (main service)
- HttpClientService (client service)
- RestClientConfiguration (configuration)
- ClientLoggerRequestInterceptor (interceptor)
The initialization order is correct because Spring automatically handles the dependency resolution, and the interceptor will be created before it's injected into the RestClientConfiguration bean. The proxyBeanMethods = false setting ensures efficient initialization without any proxy-related side effects.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check component dependencies and initialization requirements
# Look for @Configuration classes and their dependencies
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
@Configuration
$$$
}'
# Look for @Bean methods in RestClientConfiguration that might use the interceptor
ast-grep --pattern 'class RestClientConfiguration {
$$$
@Bean
$$$
}'
Length of output: 135
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to analyze the components and their dependencies
# Search for RestClientConfiguration class implementation
rg -l "class RestClientConfiguration" --type java
# Search for ClientLoggerRequestInterceptor implementation
rg -l "class ClientLoggerRequestInterceptor" --type java
# Look for @Configuration and @Bean annotations in these files
rg "@(Configuration|Bean)" --type java -C 3
# Search for dependency injection or usage of ClientLoggerRequestInterceptor
rg "ClientLoggerRequestInterceptor" --type java -C 3
Length of output: 241080
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ClientLoggerRequestInterceptorto log HTTP request and response details for better monitoring.Bug Fixes
Chores