-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat : handle exception in cache #473
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@rajadilipkolli has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 12 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the project's dependencies in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
package.json (1)
Based on the changelog information provided, I can now generate a final response that highlights the specific breaking changes and necessary actions:
Major version upgrades require careful testing and code updates
The version upgrades include significant breaking changes that need attention:
React 19:
- Requires new JSX transform
- Removes several APIs:
propTypes
, functiondefaultProps
, string refs,findDOMNode
, legacy context- Changes error handling behavior
- Introduces new behavior for refs and StrictMode
React Router 7:
- Refer to their changelog for specific breaking changes
date-fns 4.x:
- Adds timezone support to formatting functions
- Changes behavior for null handling in internal functions
- May require updates to date formatting code using these functions
Action items:
- Test the application thoroughly, especially components using removed React APIs
- Update code using deprecated React patterns (string refs, propTypes, etc.)
- Review and update date formatting code for compatibility with date-fns 4.x
- Consider using React 18.3.1 first as a stepping stone, which adds warnings for deprecated APIs
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
13-28
: Verify application compatibility with major version updatesSeveral major version updates that could introduce breaking changes:
- React 18 → 19
- React Router 6 → 7
- date-fns 2.x → 4.x
Run the following script to check for potential breaking changes:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for breaking changes in major version updates # Check React changelog for breaking changes gh api repos/facebook/react/releases/tags/v19.0.0 --jq .body # Check React Router changelog for breaking changes gh api repos/remix-run/react-router/releases/tags/[email protected] --jq .body # Check date-fns changelog for breaking changes gh api repos/date-fns/date-fns/releases/tags/v4.1.0 --jq .bodyLength of output: 40956
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
package.json
(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/app/folioman/config/redis/RedisConfig.java
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/main/java/com/app/folioman/config/redis/RedisConfig.java (1)
18-18
: LGTM: Good practice implementing CachingConfigurer
Implementing CachingConfigurer is a good approach for centralized cache error handling.
package.json (1)
124-124
: LGTM: Hash updated correctly
The hash has been updated to reflect the new dependency versions.
91aa1f6
to
d42baa5
Compare
1c03326
to
b53fc1c
Compare
@@ -27,4 +35,36 @@ CustomRedisCacheManager cacheManager(RedisConnectionFactory redisConnectionFacto | |||
RedisCacheWriter redisCacheWriter = RedisCacheWriter.nonLockingRedisCacheWriter(redisConnectionFactory); | |||
return new CustomRedisCacheManager(redisCacheWriter, redisConnectionFactory, monitor); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
@Override | |||
public CacheErrorHandler errorHandler() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@coderabbitai, is this the correct way to define CacheErrorHandler
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rajadilipkolli, yes, this is a standard and correct way to define a custom CacheErrorHandler in Spring. By implementing the methods handleCacheGetError, handleCachePutError, handleCacheEvictError, and handleCacheClearError, you can gracefully handle and log cache-related exceptions as needed. This approach should work fine for most use cases.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes