-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat : apply spring boot best practices #753
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the Dockerfiles and Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Docker as Docker Container
participant App as Spring Boot Application
User->>Docker: Start Container
Docker->>App: Execute org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher
App-->>Docker: Application Running
Docker-->>User: Container Running
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (20)
- aws-cloudwatch-project/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- aws-cloudwatch-project/pom.xml (1 hunks)
- aws-dynamodb-project/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- aws-dynamodb-project/pom.xml (1 hunks)
- aws-kinesis-project/consumer/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- aws-kinesis-project/producer/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- aws-lambda-project/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- aws-lambda-project/src/main/resources/application.properties (1 hunks)
- aws-lambda-project/src/test/java/com/learning/awslambda/ApplicationIntegrationTest.java (2 hunks)
- aws-parameterstore-project/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- aws-s3-project/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- aws-secretmanager-project/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- aws-secretmanager-project/pom.xml (1 hunks)
- aws-ses-project/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- aws-ses-project/pom.xml (1 hunks)
- aws-sns-project/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- aws-sns-project/pom.xml (1 hunks)
- aws-sqs-project/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- aws-sqs-project/pom.xml (1 hunks)
- pom.xml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- aws-lambda-project/src/test/java/com/learning/awslambda/ApplicationIntegrationTest.java
- aws-secretmanager-project/pom.xml
- aws-ses-project/pom.xml
Additional comments not posted (17)
aws-lambda-project/src/main/resources/application.properties (1)
7-7
: Approve the addition of the virtual threads property.The addition of
spring.threads.virtual.enabled=true
is a good practice to enhance concurrency capabilities in environments that support virtual threads. However, ensure that the Spring version used in the project supports this property.Run the following script to verify the Spring version:
Verification successful
Spring Boot version supports virtual threads.
The
spring-boot-starter-parent
version3.3.3
in yourpom.xml
supports virtual threads, confirming the appropriateness of thespring.threads.virtual.enabled=true
property. No further action is needed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the Spring version in the `pom.xml` to ensure it supports virtual threads. # Test: Search for the Spring version in `pom.xml`. Expect: Version that supports virtual threads. cat aws-lambda-project/pom.xml | grep 'spring.version'Length of output: 54
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for Spring dependencies in the `pom.xml` and extract their versions. # Test: Search for common Spring dependencies and their versions. grep -A 1 '<dependency>' aws-lambda-project/pom.xml | grep -E 'spring-(core|context|boot)' -A 1Length of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the `pom.xml` file and search for Spring-related dependencies or properties. # Locate the `pom.xml` file fd -e xml -g 'pom.xml' # Search for Spring-related dependencies or properties in the located `pom.xml` file if [ -f aws-lambda-project/pom.xml ]; then grep -i 'spring' aws-lambda-project/pom.xml fiLength of output: 2410
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the Spring Boot version in the `pom.xml` file. # Search for the `spring-boot-starter-parent` version in the `pom.xml` file grep -A 1 'spring-boot-starter-parent' aws-lambda-project/pom.xmlLength of output: 158
aws-s3-project/Dockerfile (1)
14-14
: Approve the updated ENTRYPOINT class reference.The change to
org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher
likely aligns with updates in the Spring Boot framework. Ensure that this change is consistently applied across all Dockerfiles in the project that utilize Spring Boot.Run the following script to verify consistency across Dockerfiles:
Verification successful
Consistent ENTRYPOINT Across Dockerfiles Verified
The
ENTRYPOINT
usingorg.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher
is consistently applied across all Dockerfiles in the project. No discrepancies were found.
- All Dockerfiles use:
ENTRYPOINT ["java", "org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher"]
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the ENTRYPOINT across all Dockerfiles in the project. # Test: Search for the ENTRYPOINT in all Dockerfiles. Expect: Consistent use of the new class reference. fd Dockerfile | xargs grep 'ENTRYPOINT'Length of output: 1211
aws-ses-project/Dockerfile (1)
14-14
: Approve the updated ENTRYPOINT class reference.The update to
org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher
is consistent with changes in the Spring Boot framework. Verify that this change does not introduce any issues specific to the AWS SES project.Run the following script to verify the specific impact on the AWS SES project:
Verification successful
ENTRYPOINT Change Verified for AWS SES Project
The change to
org.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher
as the ENTRYPOINT is consistent with the project's Spring Boot version (3.3.3) and does not introduce any issues specific to the AWS SES project. The configuration aligns with standard practices for Spring Boot applications.
- The Spring Boot version used is compatible with the
JarLauncher
.- No conflicting configurations or dependencies were found.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the specific impact of the ENTRYPOINT change on the AWS SES project. # Test: Search for potential issues introduced by the new ENTRYPOINT. Expect: No issues related to the change. echo "Manual testing or additional automated tests may be required to verify the impact."Length of output: 174
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Spring Boot configuration files or documentation that might mention the ENTRYPOINT or related configurations. rg 'ENTRYPOINT|JarLauncher' -A 5 # Check for the Spring Boot version used in the project to ensure compatibility with the new ENTRYPOINT. rg 'spring-boot' --glob '*.xml' --glob '*.properties' --glob '*.yml' -A 3 # Look for any custom scripts or Docker configurations that might be affected by this ENTRYPOINT change. rg 'ENTRYPOINT' --glob '*.sh' --glob 'Dockerfile*' -A 5Length of output: 31419
aws-sns-project/Dockerfile (1)
14-14
: Verify application behavior post-ENTRYPOINT change.The change in the
ENTRYPOINT
to useorg.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher
is noted. While this update is likely in line with best practices or framework updates, it's crucial to ensure that it does not adversely affect the application's startup and runtime behavior.Please conduct thorough testing to confirm that the application behaves as expected with the new ENTRYPOINT. This might include integration testing or smoke tests to verify that the application starts and runs correctly in its Dockerized environment.
aws-sqs-project/Dockerfile (1)
14-14
: Verify application behavior post-ENTRYPOINT change.The update to the
ENTRYPOINT
usingorg.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher
is consistent with the changes in other projects. Ensure that this modification aligns with the application's requirements and does not introduce any startup or runtime issues.It is recommended to perform integration or smoke tests to confirm that the application behaves as expected with the new ENTRYPOINT setup.
aws-lambda-project/Dockerfile (1)
14-14
: Verify application behavior post-ENTRYPOINT change, especially for AWS Lambda.The update to the
ENTRYPOINT
usingorg.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher
should be carefully evaluated, particularly because AWS Lambda has specific operational requirements. Ensure that this change is compatible with Lambda's execution model and does not affect the application's ability to start and run efficiently.Conduct tests specific to AWS Lambda to ensure that the application behaves as expected with the new ENTRYPOINT. This might include deploying a test version to the Lambda environment to verify functionality.
aws-dynamodb-project/Dockerfile (1)
14-14
: Update to ENTRYPOINT is appropriate for Spring Boot best practices.The change in the ENTRYPOINT from
org.springframework.boot.loader.JarLauncher
toorg.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher
is aligned with the latest Spring Boot best practices. This should ensure a more robust handling of the application startup within Docker.Please ensure that this new class path is correctly configured in your Spring Boot setup and test the Docker container to verify that the application initializes as expected.
aws-cloudwatch-project/Dockerfile (1)
14-14
: Consistent update to ENTRYPOINT across projects.The update in the ENTRYPOINT from
org.springframework.boot.loader.JarLauncher
toorg.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher
is consistent with the changes made in other projects. This consistency helps in maintaining a uniform approach to application deployment across different AWS projects.As with the other projects, please verify that the new class path functions correctly and that the application starts without issues in the Docker environment.
aws-secretmanager-project/Dockerfile (1)
14-14
: Uniform ENTRYPOINT update enhances project consistency.The ENTRYPOINT has been updated from
org.springframework.boot.loader.JarLauncher
toorg.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher
across multiple projects, including this one. This uniformity ensures that all projects benefit from the latest Spring Boot enhancements.Ensure to test this Dockerfile as well to confirm that the application starts correctly and that the new ENTRYPOINT does not introduce any unexpected behavior.
aws-parameterstore-project/Dockerfile (1)
14-14
: Approved: Update to ENTRYPOINT class reference.The update from
org.springframework.boot.loader.JarLauncher
toorg.springframework.boot.loader.launch.JarLauncher
is noted. This change aligns with the latest organizational changes in the Spring Boot framework. Ensure that this update is compatible with the Spring Boot version used in your project.Verification successful
Compatibility Verified: ENTRYPOINT Update in Dockerfile
The update to the
ENTRYPOINT
class reference in the Dockerfile is compatible with the Spring Boot version3.3.3
used in the project. This change aligns with the latest organizational changes in the Spring Boot framework. No further action is needed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the Spring Boot version compatibility with the new ENTRYPOINT. # Test: Check the Spring Boot version in the pom.xml or build.gradle files. rg --type pom.xml --type gradle "spring-boot.version"Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for pom.xml and build.gradle files in the repository fd -e xml -e gradle -e groovy -e kts -e propertiesLength of output: 5015
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the Spring Boot version in the aws-parameterstore-project/pom.xml file rg "<spring-boot.version>" aws-parameterstore-project/pom.xmlLength of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any mention of "spring-boot" in the aws-parameterstore-project/pom.xml file rg "spring-boot" aws-parameterstore-project/pom.xmlLength of output: 695
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the spring-boot-starter-parent section in the aws-parameterstore-project/pom.xml rg "<parent>" -A 5 aws-parameterstore-project/pom.xmlLength of output: 290
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for properties that might define the Spring Boot version in the aws-parameterstore-project/pom.xml rg "<properties>" -A 10 aws-parameterstore-project/pom.xmlLength of output: 654
aws-kinesis-project/consumer/Dockerfile (1)
14-14
: Approved: Consistent update to ENTRYPOINT class reference.The ENTRYPOINT has been updated consistently across projects, reflecting a systematic application of best practices. As with the previous Dockerfile, ensure compatibility with the Spring Boot version used in your project.
Verification successful
ENTRYPOINT Compatibility Verified with Spring Boot Version 3.3.3
The ENTRYPOINT configuration in the Dockerfile is compatible with the Spring Boot version 3.3.3 specified in the
aws-kinesis-project/consumer/pom.xml
. No issues found with the update.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the Spring Boot version compatibility with the new ENTRYPOINT. # Test: Check the Spring Boot version in the pom.xml or build.gradle files. rg --type pom.xml --type gradle "spring-boot.version"Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate pom.xml and build.gradle files in the repository fd -e xml -e gradle -e gradle.kts # If any files are found, search for the Spring Boot version within them fd -e xml -e gradle -e gradle.kts --exec rg "spring-boot.version" {}Length of output: 2769
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Spring Boot-related dependencies or plugins in the aws-kinesis-project/consumer/pom.xml file rg "spring-boot" aws-kinesis-project/consumer/pom.xmlLength of output: 696
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the parent section in the aws-kinesis-project/consumer/pom.xml to find the Spring Boot version rg "<parent>" -A 5 aws-kinesis-project/consumer/pom.xmlLength of output: 292
aws-kinesis-project/producer/Dockerfile (1)
14-14
: Approved: Uniform update to ENTRYPOINT class reference.This change is part of a coordinated update across multiple projects to align with Spring Boot best practices. Ensure that this update is compatible with the Spring Boot version used in your project.
pom.xml (1)
15-15
: Java Version Update ApprovedThe addition of
<maven.compiler.release>21</maven.compiler.release>
is approved as it specifies the project should be compiled with Java version 21. This may enable the use of newer language features and APIs introduced in Java 21.Ensure compatibility with all libraries and frameworks used in the project, as this change might affect their behavior or compatibility.
aws-sqs-project/pom.xml (1)
133-138
: JUnit Dependency Exclusion ApprovedThe addition of an exclusion block for the JUnit dependency within the
junit-jupiter
artifact is approved. This change helps prevent conflicts from multiple versions of JUnit being present, which can lead to unpredictable testing behavior.Verify that the exclusion does not impact existing tests that may rely on JUnit directly.
aws-sns-project/pom.xml (1)
99-104
: JUnit Dependency Exclusion ApprovedThe addition of an exclusion block for the JUnit dependency within the
junit-jupiter
artifact in the AWS SNS project is approved. This ensures consistency in dependency management across projects and helps prevent conflicts from multiple versions of JUnit.Verify that the exclusion does not impact existing tests that may rely on JUnit directly, similar to the verification suggested for the SQS project.
aws-dynamodb-project/pom.xml (1)
112-117
: Review the exclusion of JUnit dependency.The addition of an
<exclusions>
block for thejunit
artifact under thejunit-jupiter
dependency is correctly formatted and placed. However, it's crucial to ensure that this exclusion does not unintentionally remove necessary testing capabilities from the project. Ifjunit
is required by other dependencies or for certain tests, this exclusion could lead to runtime errors or failed tests.Consider verifying the impact of this exclusion on the project's tests by ensuring all tests still pass and no necessary dependencies are missing. This can be done by running the project's test suite and checking for any unresolved dependencies or errors related to missing JUnit classes.
aws-cloudwatch-project/pom.xml (1)
127-132
: Review the exclusion of JUnit dependency in the CloudWatch project.The exclusion of the
junit
artifact from thejunit-jupiter
dependency is correctly implemented in terms of XML syntax and placement within the dependency block. This change is beneficial for avoiding version conflicts and reducing the dependency tree size. However, it's important to ensure that this exclusion does not lead to missing dependencies that are crucial for the project's tests.It would be prudent to verify that all tests still function as expected without the excluded
junit
dependency. This can be done by running the test suite and checking for any failures or issues that could be attributed to missing JUnit classes or version conflicts.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- aws-lambda-project/src/main/resources/application.properties (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (13)
aws-lambda-project/src/main/resources/application.properties (13)
14-14
: Correct setting for SQL logging.Setting
spring.jpa.show-sql=false
is a best practice for production environments to avoid logging sensitive SQL information and reduce log clutter. This change aligns with security and performance best practices.
15-15
: Disabling Open Session in View.Setting
spring.jpa.open-in-view=false
is a recommended practice to avoid common pitfalls associated with the Open Session in View anti-pattern, such as unexpected database transactions and performance issues. This change enhances the robustness of the application.
17-17
: Setting Hibernate DDL mode to none.Configuring
spring.jpa.hibernate.ddl-auto=none
prevents Hibernate from making unintended changes to the database schema at runtime, which is crucial for production environments to maintain database integrity.
19-19
: Setting the JDBC time zone to UTC.Configuring
spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.jdbc.time_zone=UTC
ensures that all date/time operations are consistent across different environments, which is particularly important for applications deployed in multiple regions.
20-20
: Disabling Hibernate statistics generation.Setting
spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.generate_statistics=false
helps improve performance by not collecting runtime statistics, which can be resource-intensive.
21-21
: Configuring Hibernate batch size.Setting
spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.jdbc.batch_size=25
optimizes the batch processing of SQL statements, which can significantly improve performance when dealing with large volumes of data.
22-22
: Enabling ordered inserts.Setting
spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.order_inserts=true
can optimize the order of insert statements for better performance, especially when inserting a large number of entities.
23-23
: Enabling ordered updates.Setting
spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.order_updates=true
optimizes the order of update statements, which can reduce deadlock risks and improve database performance.
24-24
: Fail on pagination over collection fetch.Enabling
spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.query.fail_on_pagination_over_collection_fetch=true
helps prevent inefficient queries that can lead to performance degradation, by failing fast on bad pagination practices.
25-25
: Enabling in-clause parameter padding.Setting
spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.query.in_clause_parameter_padding=true
can improve query plan caching efficiency by standardizing the size of the IN clause in SQL queries.
26-26
: Setting query plan cache size.Configuring
spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.query.plan_cache_max_size=4096
allows for a larger number of query plans to be cached, which can improve performance by reducing the need for query compilation.
27-27
: Disabling auto-commit on the provider level.Setting
spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.connection.provider_disables_autocommit=true
ensures that database transactions are explicitly managed, which can prevent accidental data corruption and improve performance.
28-28
: Enabling non-contextual LOB creation.Setting
spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.jdbc.lob.non_contextual_creation=true
is useful for certain databases where LOB handling requires specific configurations to avoid context issues.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation