Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use ubuntu-latest instead of a hosted 4-core runner #7973

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jeefy
Copy link

@jeefy jeefy commented Sep 30, 2024

Description

Heya! Friendly neighborhood CNCF staffer here. The ubuntu-latest runner is already a 4-core runner, so using a hosted 4-core runner is unnecessary (and actually costs money). This PR just swaps any 4-core hosted runners to use ubuntu-latest. There should be zero change or impact, functionally this is a SKU change.

Please reach out to me in the CNCF/K8s slack(s) (jeefy) or via email ([email protected]) with any questions.

Type of change

Replaces ubuntu-latest-m (which is a pay-for 4-core hosted runner) to ubuntu-latest (which is the free 4-core runner with no real spec difference)

@jeefy jeefy requested review from a team as code owners September 30, 2024 16:52
@rynowak
Copy link
Contributor

rynowak commented Sep 30, 2024

Thanks @jeefy - approved the workflows so we can test this out!

@radius-functional-tests
Copy link

radius-functional-tests bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Radius functional test overview

🔍 Go to test action run

Name Value
Repository jeefy/radius
Commit ref 01bb0bf
Unique ID func464a9be871
Image tag pr-func464a9be871
Click here to see the list of tools in the current test run
  • gotestsum 1.12.0
  • KinD: v0.20.0
  • Dapr: 1.12.0
  • Azure KeyVault CSI driver: 1.4.2
  • Azure Workload identity webhook: 1.3.0
  • Bicep recipe location ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/test/testrecipes/test-bicep-recipes/<name>:pr-func464a9be871
  • Terraform recipe location http://tf-module-server.radius-test-tf-module-server.svc.cluster.local/<name>.zip (in cluster)
  • applications-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/applications-rp:pr-func464a9be871
  • controller test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/controller:pr-func464a9be871
  • ucp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/ucpd:pr-func464a9be871
  • deployment-engine test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/deployment-engine:latest

Test Status

⌛ Building Radius and pushing container images for functional tests...
✅ Container images build succeeded
⌛ Publishing Bicep Recipes for functional tests...
✅ Recipe publishing succeeded
⌛ Starting corerp-cloud functional tests...
⌛ Starting ucp-cloud functional tests...
⌛ Starting datastoresrp-cloud functional tests...
✅ ucp-cloud functional tests succeeded
✅ datastoresrp-cloud functional tests succeeded
✅ corerp-cloud functional tests succeeded

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 60.63%. Comparing base (b2eb80b) to head (58ba102).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7973   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   60.63%   60.63%           
=======================================
  Files         534      534           
  Lines       28484    28484           
=======================================
  Hits        17271    17271           
  Misses       9697     9697           
  Partials     1516     1516           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@lakshmimsft
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you @jeefy !
But it looks like we hit a error running out of disk space with this update consistently. (Following are errors in different runs:)
https://github.com/radius-project/radius/actions/runs/11110614862/job/30941040772?pr=7973
image

https://github.com/radius-project/radius/actions/runs/11110614862/job/30941845181?pr=7973
image

We may have to stay with ubuntu-latest-m for now until we can explore possibilities like cleaning up after steps or other optimizations.
cc @rynowak

@rynowak
Copy link
Contributor

rynowak commented Oct 2, 2024

@jeefy - any ideas? We're using kind in the test pipelines to stand up Kubernetes, and then running tests on that cluster.

@radius-functional-tests
Copy link

radius-functional-tests bot commented Oct 7, 2024

Radius functional test overview

🔍 Go to test action run

Name Value
Repository jeefy/radius
Commit ref b407aba
Unique ID func06bf3feca5
Image tag pr-func06bf3feca5
Click here to see the list of tools in the current test run
  • gotestsum 1.12.0
  • KinD: v0.20.0
  • Dapr: 1.12.0
  • Azure KeyVault CSI driver: 1.4.2
  • Azure Workload identity webhook: 1.3.0
  • Bicep recipe location ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/test/testrecipes/test-bicep-recipes/<name>:pr-func06bf3feca5
  • Terraform recipe location http://tf-module-server.radius-test-tf-module-server.svc.cluster.local/<name>.zip (in cluster)
  • applications-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/applications-rp:pr-func06bf3feca5
  • controller test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/controller:pr-func06bf3feca5
  • ucp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/ucpd:pr-func06bf3feca5
  • deployment-engine test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/deployment-engine:latest

Test Status

⌛ Building Radius and pushing container images for functional tests...
✅ Container images build succeeded
⌛ Publishing Bicep Recipes for functional tests...
✅ Recipe publishing succeeded
⌛ Starting corerp-cloud functional tests...
⌛ Starting ucp-cloud functional tests...
⌛ Starting datastoresrp-cloud functional tests...
✅ ucp-cloud functional tests succeeded
✅ corerp-cloud functional tests succeeded
✅ datastoresrp-cloud functional tests succeeded

@ytimocin
Copy link
Contributor

ytimocin commented Oct 7, 2024

ubuntu-latest-m has 16 GB RAM. Not sure if ubuntu-latest also has that much.

That could be the reason why one of our functional tests is failing.

@jeefy
Copy link
Author

jeefy commented Oct 9, 2024

They have the same amount of RAM, but the disk space is different (free runner: 14GB, non-free... 140GB)

I'm going to update the PR to use one of our hosted runners since it has more disk.

@radius-functional-tests
Copy link

radius-functional-tests bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Radius functional test overview

🔍 Go to test action run

Name Value
Repository jeefy/radius
Commit ref a14c69b
Unique ID func54cf832752
Image tag pr-func54cf832752
Click here to see the list of tools in the current test run
  • gotestsum 1.12.0
  • KinD: v0.20.0
  • Dapr: 1.12.0
  • Azure KeyVault CSI driver: 1.4.2
  • Azure Workload identity webhook: 1.3.0
  • Bicep recipe location ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/test/testrecipes/test-bicep-recipes/<name>:pr-func54cf832752
  • Terraform recipe location http://tf-module-server.radius-test-tf-module-server.svc.cluster.local/<name>.zip (in cluster)
  • applications-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/applications-rp:pr-func54cf832752
  • controller test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/controller:pr-func54cf832752
  • ucp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/ucpd:pr-func54cf832752
  • deployment-engine test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/deployment-engine:latest

Test Status

⌛ Building Radius and pushing container images for functional tests...
✅ Container images build succeeded
⌛ Publishing Bicep Recipes for functional tests...
✅ Recipe publishing succeeded
⌛ Starting corerp-cloud functional tests...
⌛ Starting ucp-cloud functional tests...
⌛ Starting datastoresrp-cloud functional tests...
✅ corerp-cloud functional tests succeeded
✅ ucp-cloud functional tests succeeded
✅ datastoresrp-cloud functional tests succeeded

@jeefy
Copy link
Author

jeefy commented Oct 9, 2024

Don't know why the job isn't getting picked up, and I watched other jobs outside of this repo during this. I'll have to investigate further. Thanks!

@rynowak
Copy link
Contributor

rynowak commented Nov 10, 2024

Don't know why the job isn't getting picked up, and I watched other jobs outside of this repo during this. I'll have to investigate further. Thanks!

Any ideas?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants