Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Convert todo_comment_linter to XPath approach #2438

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Dec 15, 2023
Merged

Convert todo_comment_linter to XPath approach #2438

merged 12 commits into from
Dec 15, 2023

Conversation

MichaelChirico
Copy link
Collaborator

Follow-up to #2437, towards #2047.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 14, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (6cbb24c) 98.54% compared to head (8bc2c7a) 98.52%.

❗ Current head 8bc2c7a differs from pull request most recent head 2da039b. Consider uploading reports for the commit 2da039b to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2438      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.54%   98.52%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         126      126              
  Lines        5633     5627       -6     
==========================================
- Hits         5551     5544       -7     
- Misses         82       83       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

)
}

Linter(linter_level = "file", function(source_expression) {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why apply this on the file-level?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was thinking there's not much benefit to being expression-level for what's basically a simple text-match linter. But there might be a ton of comments in a huge file, so maybe caching would help.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm thinking we should specify the lowest cacheable level, which should be expression here.

I have an idea cooking on how to speed up expression-level linters by running them on the file-level if they support it and being smart about the caching. But that's not completely ripe yet.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sounds exciting. I think something like this is definitely possible and would be a big boon to anyone who never caches (like me 😅)

R/todo_comment_linter.R Show resolved Hide resolved
@IndrajeetPatil IndrajeetPatil merged commit f865f94 into main Dec 15, 2023
21 checks passed
@MichaelChirico MichaelChirico deleted the todo-xml branch December 15, 2023 06:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants