Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Catch NA %in% x in any_is_na_linter() #2436

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 15, 2023
Merged

Catch NA %in% x in any_is_na_linter() #2436

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 15, 2023

Conversation

MichaelChirico
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #2113

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 14, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (f865f94) 98.52% compared to head (59b9b95) 98.52%.

❗ Current head 59b9b95 differs from pull request most recent head c62d351. Consider uploading reports for the commit c62d351 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2436   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.52%   98.52%           
=======================================
  Files         126      126           
  Lines        5627     5636    +9     
=======================================
+ Hits         5544     5553    +9     
  Misses         83       83           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@IndrajeetPatil IndrajeetPatil merged commit ca1b16d into main Dec 15, 2023
21 checks passed
@IndrajeetPatil IndrajeetPatil deleted the anyna-in branch December 15, 2023 07:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

any_is_na_linter() should throw for NA %in% x
4 participants