Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[3.9] gh-121957: Emit audit events for python -i and python -m asyncio #122120

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2024
Merged

[3.9] gh-121957: Emit audit events for python -i and python -m asyncio #122120

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2024

Conversation

ambv
Copy link
Contributor

@ambv ambv commented Jul 22, 2024 •
edited by bedevere-app bot
Loading

@ambv ambv requested review from 1st1 and asvetlov as code owners July 22, 2024 11:33
@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot mentioned this pull request Jul 22, 2024
Open
@ambv ambv merged commit 9e9c71d into python:3.9 Jul 22, 2024
13 of 14 checks passed
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot s390x SLES 3.9 has failed when building commit 9e9c71d.

What do you need to do:

  1. Don't panic.
  2. Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
  3. Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#builders/535/builds/706) and take a look at the build logs.
  4. Check if the failure is related to this commit (9e9c71d) or if it is a false positive.
  5. If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#builders/535/builds/706

Failed tests:

  • test_zlib

Failed subtests:

  • test_pair - test.test_zlib.CompressObjectTestCase
  • test_speech128 - test.test_zlib.CompressTestCase

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

== Tests result: FAILURE then FAILURE ==

411 tests OK.

10 slowest tests:

  • test_concurrent_futures: 2 min 22 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_spawn: 1 min 32 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_forkserver: 1 min 23 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_fork: 1 min 6 sec
  • test_unparse: 50.2 sec
  • test_signal: 47.7 sec
  • test_tokenize: 46.5 sec
  • test_asyncio: 45.4 sec
  • test_capi: 40.1 sec
  • test_io: 37.1 sec

1 test failed:
test_zlib

13 tests skipped:
test_devpoll test_ioctl test_kqueue test_msilib test_nis
test_startfile test_tix test_tk test_ttk_guionly test_winconsoleio
test_winreg test_winsound test_zipfile64

1 re-run test:
test_zlib

Total duration: 5 min 29 sec

Click to see traceback logs 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-sles-z/build/Lib/test/test_zlib.py", line 251, in test_pair
    self.assertEqual(x1 + x2, datazip)
AssertionError: b'x\x9c\xe2\xf2qt\r\nq\r\xe6\xe2R\x80\x00\x7f\x1d\x[99702 chars]\x95' != b'x\x9c\xe3\xf2qt\r\nq\r\xe6\xe2R\x80\x00\x7f\x1d\x[114964 chars]\x95'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-sles-z/build/Lib/multiprocessing/resource_tracker.py", line 201, in main
    cache[rtype].remove(name)
KeyError: '/psm_361e73f3'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-sles-z/build/Lib/test/test_zlib.py", line 194, in test_speech128
    self.assertEqual(zlib.compress(bytearray(data)), x)
AssertionError: b'x\x[224 chars]\x19\x8a\xb0\xc0Q!%\xbf4)\'U\x01\x88\x8b\x8b3\[113067 chars]\x95' != b'x\x[224 chars]\x19\n\xb3@A\xc1Q!%\xbf4)\'U\x01\x88\x8b\x8b3\[115458 chars]\x95'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-sles-z/build/Lib/test/test_zlib.py", line 251, in test_pair
    self.assertEqual(x1 + x2, datazip)
AssertionError: b'x\x9c\xe2\xf2qt\r\nq\r\xe6\xe2R\x80\x00\x7f\x1d\x[102023 chars]\x95' != b'x\x9c\xe3\xf2qt\r\nq\r\xe6\xe2R\x80\x00\x7f\x1d\x[115682 chars]\x95'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-sles-z/build/Lib/multiprocessing/resource_tracker.py", line 201, in main
    cache[rtype].remove(name)
KeyError: '/psm_0ca0fb68'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-sles-z/build/Lib/multiprocessing/resource_tracker.py", line 201, in main
    cache[rtype].remove(name)
KeyError: '/psm_b1915598'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-sles-z/build/Lib/test/test_zlib.py", line 194, in test_speech128
    self.assertEqual(zlib.compress(bytearray(data)), x)
AssertionError: b'x\x[2207 chars]\xf9y0m\x8e\x90`LT\xc8\x05\xfaG\xa185\'5\xb9\x[112720 chars]\x95' != b'x\x[2207 chars]\xf9ypm\x90`LT\xc8\x05\xfaG\xa185\'5\xb9\x04\x[112757 chars]\x95'

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot AMD64 FreeBSD 3.9 has failed when building commit 9e9c71d.

What do you need to do:

  1. Don't panic.
  2. Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
  3. Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#builders/1222/builds/28) and take a look at the build logs.
  4. Check if the failure is related to this commit (9e9c71d) or if it is a false positive.
  5. If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#builders/1222/builds/28

Failed tests:

  • test_tarfile

Failed subtests:

  • test_modes - test.test_tarfile.TestExtractionFilters

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

== Tests result: FAILURE then FAILURE ==

411 tests OK.

10 slowest tests:

  • test_concurrent_futures: 2 min 18 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_spawn: 1 min 32 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_forkserver: 1 min 18 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_fork: 1 min 10 sec
  • test_signal: 46.4 sec
  • test_asyncio: 43.6 sec
  • test_capi: 41.4 sec
  • test_io: 33.6 sec
  • test_subprocess: 32.9 sec
  • test_pydoc: 31.4 sec

1 test failed:
test_tarfile

13 tests skipped:
test_devpoll test_epoll test_ioctl test_msilib test_spwd
test_startfile test_tix test_tk test_ttk_guionly test_winconsoleio
test_winreg test_winsound test_zipfile64

1 re-run test:
test_tarfile

Total duration: 5 min 27 sec

Click to see traceback logs 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/buildbot/buildarea/3.9.ware-freebsd/build/Lib/test/test_tarfile.py", line 3618, in test_modes
    os.chmod(tmp_filename, os.stat(tmp_filename).st_mode | stat.S_ISVTX)
OSError: [Errno 79] Inappropriate file type or format: '/buildbot/buildarea/3.9.ware-freebsd/build/build/test_python_9893æ/@test_9893_tmpæ-tardir/tmp.file'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/buildbot/buildarea/3.9.ware-freebsd/build/Lib/test/test_tarfile.py", line 3618, in test_modes
    os.chmod(tmp_filename, os.stat(tmp_filename).st_mode | stat.S_ISVTX)
OSError: [Errno 79] Inappropriate file type or format: '/buildbot/buildarea/3.9.ware-freebsd/build/build/test_python_9893æ/test_python_worker_11296æ/@test_11296_tmpæ-tardir/tmp.file'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/buildbot/buildarea/3.9.ware-freebsd/build/Lib/multiprocessing/resource_tracker.py", line 201, in main
    cache[rtype].remove(name)
KeyError: '/psm_c725c564'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/buildbot/buildarea/3.9.ware-freebsd/build/Lib/multiprocessing/resource_tracker.py", line 201, in main
    cache[rtype].remove(name)
KeyError: '/psm_53b71d7b'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/buildbot/buildarea/3.9.ware-freebsd/build/Lib/multiprocessing/resource_tracker.py", line 201, in main
    cache[rtype].remove(name)
KeyError: '/psm_1c076949'

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot AMD64 FreeBSD14 3.9 has failed when building commit 9e9c71d.

What do you need to do:

  1. Don't panic.
  2. Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
  3. Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#builders/1229/builds/20) and take a look at the build logs.
  4. Check if the failure is related to this commit (9e9c71d) or if it is a false positive.
  5. If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#builders/1229/builds/20

Failed tests:

  • test_tarfile

Failed subtests:

  • test_modes - test.test_tarfile.TestExtractionFilters

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

== Tests result: FAILURE then FAILURE ==

409 tests OK.

10 slowest tests:

  • test_concurrent_futures: 2 min 35 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_spawn: 2 min 16 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_forkserver: 1 min 35 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_fork: 1 min 34 sec
  • test_asyncio: 1 min 27 sec
  • test_unparse: 1 min 26 sec
  • test_tokenize: 1 min 24 sec
  • test_capi: 1 min 1 sec
  • test_lib2to3: 54.8 sec
  • test_subprocess: 51.2 sec

1 test failed:
test_tarfile

15 tests skipped:
test_dbm_gnu test_devpoll test_epoll test_gdb test_ioctl
test_msilib test_spwd test_startfile test_tix test_tk
test_ttk_guionly test_winconsoleio test_winreg test_winsound
test_zipfile64

1 re-run test:
test_tarfile

Total duration: 9 min 27 sec

Click to see traceback logs 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.9.opsec-fbsd14/build/Lib/test/test_tarfile.py", line 3618, in test_modes
    os.chmod(tmp_filename, os.stat(tmp_filename).st_mode | stat.S_ISVTX)
OSError: [Errno 79] Inappropriate file type or format: '/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.9.opsec-fbsd14/build/build/test_python_64048æ/test_python_worker_70385æ/@test_70385_tmpæ-tardir/tmp.file'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.9.opsec-fbsd14/build/Lib/multiprocessing/resource_tracker.py", line 201, in main
    cache[rtype].remove(name)
KeyError: '/psm_53d2bf13'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.9.opsec-fbsd14/build/Lib/multiprocessing/resource_tracker.py", line 201, in main
    cache[rtype].remove(name)
KeyError: '/psm_141c1f40'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.9.opsec-fbsd14/build/Lib/test/test_tarfile.py", line 3618, in test_modes
    os.chmod(tmp_filename, os.stat(tmp_filename).st_mode | stat.S_ISVTX)
OSError: [Errno 79] Inappropriate file type or format: '/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.9.opsec-fbsd14/build/build/test_python_64048æ/@test_64048_tmpæ-tardir/tmp.file'

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot AMD64 Arch Linux Usan 3.9 has failed when building commit 9e9c71d.

What do you need to do:

  1. Don't panic.
  2. Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
  3. Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#builders/715/builds/383) and take a look at the build logs.
  4. Check if the failure is related to this commit (9e9c71d) or if it is a false positive.
  5. If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#builders/715/builds/383

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

Click to see traceback logs 
remote: Enumerating objects: 5994, done.        
remote: Counting objects:   0% (1/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:   1% (33/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:   2% (66/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:   3% (99/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:   4% (132/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:   5% (165/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:   6% (198/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:   7% (231/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:   8% (264/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:   9% (297/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  10% (329/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  11% (362/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  12% (395/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  13% (428/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  14% (461/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  15% (494/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  16% (527/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  17% (560/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  18% (593/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  19% (625/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  20% (658/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  21% (691/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  22% (724/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  23% (757/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  24% (790/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  25% (823/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  26% (856/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  27% (889/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  28% (921/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  29% (954/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  30% (987/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  31% (1020/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  32% (1053/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  33% (1086/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  34% (1119/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  35% (1152/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  36% (1185/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  37% (1217/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  38% (1250/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  39% (1283/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  40% (1316/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  41% (1349/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  42% (1382/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  43% (1415/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  44% (1448/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  45% (1481/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  46% (1513/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  47% (1546/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  48% (1579/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  49% (1612/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  50% (1645/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  51% (1678/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  52% (1711/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  53% (1744/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  54% (1777/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  55% (1809/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  56% (1842/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  57% (1875/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  58% (1908/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  59% (1941/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  60% (1974/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  61% (2007/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  62% (2040/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  63% (2073/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  64% (2105/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  65% (2138/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  66% (2171/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  67% (2204/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  68% (2237/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  69% (2270/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  70% (2303/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  71% (2336/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  72% (2369/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  73% (2401/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  74% (2434/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  75% (2467/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  76% (2500/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  77% (2533/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  78% (2566/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  79% (2599/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  80% (2632/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  81% (2665/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  82% (2697/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  83% (2730/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  84% (2763/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  85% (2796/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  86% (2829/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  87% (2862/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  88% (2895/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  89% (2928/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  90% (2961/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  91% (2993/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  92% (3026/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  93% (3059/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  94% (3092/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  95% (3125/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  96% (3158/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  97% (3191/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  98% (3224/3289)        
remote: Counting objects:  99% (3257/3289)        
remote: Counting objects: 100% (3289/3289)        
remote: Counting objects: 100% (3289/3289), done.        
remote: Compressing objects:   4% (1/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:   9% (2/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:  13% (3/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:  18% (4/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:  22% (5/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:  27% (6/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:  31% (7/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:  36% (8/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:  40% (9/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:  45% (10/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:  50% (11/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:  54% (12/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:  59% (13/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:  63% (14/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:  68% (15/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:  72% (16/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:  77% (17/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:  81% (18/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:  86% (19/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:  90% (20/22)        
remote: Compressing objects:  95% (21/22)        
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (22/22)        
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (22/22), done.        
Receiving objects:   0% (1/5994)
Receiving objects:   1% (60/5994)
Receiving objects:   2% (120/5994)
Receiving objects:   3% (180/5994)
Receiving objects:   4% (240/5994)
Receiving objects:   5% (300/5994)
Receiving objects:   6% (360/5994)
Receiving objects:   7% (420/5994)
Receiving objects:   8% (480/5994)
Receiving objects:   9% (540/5994)
Receiving objects:  10% (600/5994)
Receiving objects:  11% (660/5994)
Receiving objects:  12% (720/5994)
Receiving objects:  13% (780/5994)
Receiving objects:  14% (840/5994)
Receiving objects:  15% (900/5994)
Receiving objects:  16% (960/5994)
Receiving objects:  17% (1019/5994)
Receiving objects:  18% (1079/5994)
Receiving objects:  19% (1139/5994)
Receiving objects:  20% (1199/5994)
Receiving objects:  21% (1259/5994)
Receiving objects:  22% (1319/5994)
Receiving objects:  23% (1379/5994)
Receiving objects:  24% (1439/5994)
Receiving objects:  25% (1499/5994)
Receiving objects:  26% (1559/5994)
Receiving objects:  27% (1619/5994)
Receiving objects:  28% (1679/5994)
Receiving objects:  29% (1739/5994)
Receiving objects:  30% (1799/5994)
Receiving objects:  31% (1859/5994)
Receiving objects:  32% (1919/5994)
Receiving objects:  33% (1979/5994)
Receiving objects:  34% (2038/5994)
Receiving objects:  35% (2098/5994)
Receiving objects:  36% (2158/5994)
Receiving objects:  37% (2218/5994)
Receiving objects:  38% (2278/5994)
Receiving objects:  39% (2338/5994)
Receiving objects:  40% (2398/5994)
Receiving objects:  41% (2458/5994)
Receiving objects:  42% (2518/5994)
Receiving objects:  43% (2578/5994)
Receiving objects:  44% (2638/5994)
Receiving objects:  45% (2698/5994)
Receiving objects:  46% (2758/5994)
Receiving objects:  47% (2818/5994)
Receiving objects:  48% (2878/5994)
Receiving objects:  49% (2938/5994)
Receiving objects:  50% (2997/5994)
Receiving objects:  51% (3057/5994)
Receiving objects:  52% (3117/5994)
Receiving objects:  53% (3177/5994)
Receiving objects:  54% (3237/5994)
Receiving objects:  55% (3297/5994)
Receiving objects:  56% (3357/5994)
Receiving objects:  57% (3417/5994)
Receiving objects:  58% (3477/5994)
Receiving objects:  59% (3537/5994)
Receiving objects:  60% (3597/5994)
Receiving objects:  61% (3657/5994)
Receiving objects:  62% (3717/5994)
Receiving objects:  63% (3777/5994)
Receiving objects:  64% (3837/5994)
Receiving objects:  65% (3897/5994)
Receiving objects:  66% (3957/5994)
Receiving objects:  67% (4016/5994)
Receiving objects:  68% (4076/5994)
Receiving objects:  69% (4136/5994)
Receiving objects:  70% (4196/5994)
Receiving objects:  71% (4256/5994)
Receiving objects:  72% (4316/5994)
Receiving objects:  73% (4376/5994)
Receiving objects:  74% (4436/5994)
Receiving objects:  75% (4496/5994)
Receiving objects:  76% (4556/5994)
Receiving objects:  77% (4616/5994)
Receiving objects:  78% (4676/5994)
Receiving objects:  79% (4736/5994)
Receiving objects:  80% (4796/5994)
Receiving objects:  81% (4856/5994)
Receiving objects:  82% (4916/5994)
Receiving objects:  83% (4976/5994)
Receiving objects:  84% (5035/5994)
Receiving objects:  85% (5095/5994)
Receiving objects:  86% (5155/5994)
Receiving objects:  87% (5215/5994)
Receiving objects:  88% (5275/5994)
Receiving objects:  89% (5335/5994)
Receiving objects:  90% (5395/5994)
Receiving objects:  91% (5455/5994)
Receiving objects:  92% (5515/5994)
Receiving objects:  93% (5575/5994)
Receiving objects:  94% (5635/5994)
Receiving objects:  95% (5695/5994)
Receiving objects:  96% (5755/5994)
Receiving objects:  97% (5815/5994)
Receiving objects:  98% (5875/5994)
Receiving objects:  99% (5935/5994)
remote: Total 5994 (delta 3271), reused 3278 (delta 3267), pack-reused 2705        
Receiving objects: 100% (5994/5994)
Receiving objects: 100% (5994/5994), 10.63 MiB | 36.42 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas:   0% (0/4628)
Resolving deltas:   1% (47/4628)
Resolving deltas:   2% (93/4628)
Resolving deltas:   3% (139/4628)
Resolving deltas:   4% (186/4628)
Resolving deltas:   5% (232/4628)
Resolving deltas:   6% (278/4628)
Resolving deltas:   7% (324/4628)
Resolving deltas:   8% (371/4628)
Resolving deltas:   9% (417/4628)
Resolving deltas:  10% (463/4628)
Resolving deltas:  11% (510/4628)
Resolving deltas:  12% (556/4628)
Resolving deltas:  13% (602/4628)
Resolving deltas:  14% (648/4628)
Resolving deltas:  15% (695/4628)
Resolving deltas:  16% (741/4628)
Resolving deltas:  17% (787/4628)
Resolving deltas:  18% (834/4628)
Resolving deltas:  19% (880/4628)
Resolving deltas:  20% (926/4628)
Resolving deltas:  21% (972/4628)
Resolving deltas:  22% (1019/4628)
Resolving deltas:  23% (1065/4628)
Resolving deltas:  24% (1111/4628)
Resolving deltas:  25% (1157/4628)
Resolving deltas:  26% (1204/4628)
Resolving deltas:  27% (1250/4628)
Resolving deltas:  28% (1296/4628)
Resolving deltas:  29% (1343/4628)
Resolving deltas:  30% (1389/4628)
Resolving deltas:  31% (1435/4628)
Resolving deltas:  32% (1481/4628)
Resolving deltas:  33% (1528/4628)
Resolving deltas:  34% (1574/4628)
Resolving deltas:  35% (1620/4628)
Resolving deltas:  36% (1667/4628)
Resolving deltas:  37% (1713/4628)
Resolving deltas:  38% (1759/4628)
Resolving deltas:  39% (1805/4628)
Resolving deltas:  40% (1852/4628)
Resolving deltas:  41% (1898/4628)
Resolving deltas:  42% (1944/4628)
Resolving deltas:  43% (1991/4628)
Resolving deltas:  44% (2037/4628)
Resolving deltas:  45% (2083/4628)
Resolving deltas:  46% (2129/4628)
Resolving deltas:  47% (2176/4628)
Resolving deltas:  48% (2222/4628)
Resolving deltas:  49% (2268/4628)
Resolving deltas:  50% (2314/4628)
Resolving deltas:  51% (2361/4628)
Resolving deltas:  52% (2407/4628)
Resolving deltas:  53% (2453/4628)
Resolving deltas:  54% (2500/4628)
Resolving deltas:  55% (2546/4628)
Resolving deltas:  56% (2592/4628)
Resolving deltas:  57% (2638/4628)
Resolving deltas:  58% (2685/4628)
Resolving deltas:  59% (2731/4628)
Resolving deltas:  60% (2777/4628)
Resolving deltas:  61% (2824/4628)
Resolving deltas:  62% (2870/4628)
Resolving deltas:  63% (2916/4628)
Resolving deltas:  64% (2962/4628)
Resolving deltas:  65% (3009/4628)
Resolving deltas:  65% (3041/4628)
Resolving deltas:  66% (3055/4628)
Resolving deltas:  67% (3101/4628)
Resolving deltas:  68% (3148/4628)
Resolving deltas:  69% (3194/4628)
Resolving deltas:  70% (3240/4628)
Resolving deltas:  71% (3286/4628)
Resolving deltas:  72% (3333/4628)
Resolving deltas:  73% (3379/4628)
Resolving deltas:  74% (3425/4628)
Resolving deltas:  75% (3471/4628)
Resolving deltas:  76% (3518/4628)
Resolving deltas:  76% (3540/4628)
Resolving deltas:  77% (3564/4628)
Resolving deltas:  78% (3610/4628)
Resolving deltas:  79% (3657/4628)
Resolving deltas:  80% (3703/4628)
Resolving deltas:  81% (3749/4628)
Resolving deltas:  81% (3793/4628)
Resolving deltas:  82% (3795/4628)
Resolving deltas:  83% (3842/4628)
Resolving deltas:  84% (3888/4628)
Resolving deltas:  85% (3934/4628)
Resolving deltas:  85% (3955/4628)
Resolving deltas:  86% (3981/4628)
Resolving deltas:  87% (4027/4628)
Resolving deltas:  88% (4073/4628)
Resolving deltas:  89% (4119/4628)
Resolving deltas:  90% (4166/4628)
Resolving deltas:  91% (4212/4628)
Resolving deltas:  92% (4258/4628)
Resolving deltas:  92% (4275/4628)
Resolving deltas:  93% (4305/4628)
Resolving deltas:  94% (4351/4628)
Resolving deltas:  95% (4397/4628)
Resolving deltas:  96% (4443/4628)
Resolving deltas:  97% (4490/4628)
Resolving deltas:  98% (4536/4628)
Resolving deltas:  99% (4582/4628)
Resolving deltas: 100% (4628/4628)
Resolving deltas: 100% (4628/4628), completed with 973 local objects.
From https://github.com/python/cpython
 * branch                  3.9        -> FETCH_HEAD
 * [new tag]               v3.12.4    -> v3.12.4
 * [new tag]               v3.13.0b2  -> v3.13.0b2
 * [new tag]               v3.13.0b3  -> v3.13.0b3
 * [new tag]               v3.13.0b4  -> v3.13.0b4
Note: switching to '9e9c71d09e68b42fd1b251af6e4bfde697fe9b57'.

You are in 'detached HEAD' state. You can look around, make experimental
changes and commit them, and you can discard any commits you make in this
state without impacting any branches by switching back to a branch.

If you want to create a new branch to retain commits you create, you may
do so (now or later) by using -c with the switch command. Example:

  git switch -c <new-branch-name>

Or undo this operation with:

  git switch -

Turn off this advice by setting config variable advice.detachedHead to false

HEAD is now at 9e9c71d09e [3.9] gh-121957: Emit audit events for python -i and python -m asyncio (GH-122120)
Switched to and reset branch '3.9'

Objects/fileobject.c:245:9: warning: variable 'newlinetypes' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
  245 |     int newlinetypes = 0;
      |         ^
1 warning generated.
Objects/dictobject.c:2229:16: warning: variable 'i' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
 2229 |     Py_ssize_t i, j;
      |                ^
1 warning generated.
Objects/obmalloc.c:2639:14: warning: variable 'j' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
 2639 |         uint j;
      |              ^
1 warning generated.
Python/pytime.c:160:10: warning: implicit conversion from 'time_t' (aka 'long') to 'double' changes value from 9223372036854775807 to 9223372036854775808 [-Wimplicit-const-int-float-conversion]
  160 |     if (!_Py_InIntegralTypeRange(time_t, intpart)) {
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./Include/pymath.h:228:82: note: expanded from macro '_Py_InIntegralTypeRange'
  228 | #define _Py_InIntegralTypeRange(type, v) (_Py_IntegralTypeMin(type) <= v && v <= _Py_IntegralTypeMax(type))
      |                                                                               ~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./Include/pymath.h:221:124: note: expanded from macro '_Py_IntegralTypeMax'
  221 | #define _Py_IntegralTypeMax(type) ((_Py_IntegralTypeSigned(type)) ? (((((type)1 << (sizeof(type)*CHAR_BIT - 2)) - 1) << 1) + 1) : ~(type)0)
      |                                                                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
Python/pytime.c:213:14: warning: implicit conversion from 'time_t' (aka 'long') to 'double' changes value from 9223372036854775807 to 9223372036854775808 [-Wimplicit-const-int-float-conversion]
  213 |         if (!_Py_InIntegralTypeRange(time_t, intpart)) {
      |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./Include/pymath.h:228:82: note: expanded from macro '_Py_InIntegralTypeRange'
  228 | #define _Py_InIntegralTypeRange(type, v) (_Py_IntegralTypeMin(type) <= v && v <= _Py_IntegralTypeMax(type))
      |                                                                               ~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./Include/pymath.h:221:124: note: expanded from macro '_Py_IntegralTypeMax'
  221 | #define _Py_IntegralTypeMax(type) ((_Py_IntegralTypeSigned(type)) ? (((((type)1 << (sizeof(type)*CHAR_BIT - 2)) - 1) << 1) + 1) : ~(type)0)
      |                                                                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
Python/pytime.c:398:10: warning: implicit conversion from '_PyTime_t' (aka 'long') to 'double' changes value from 9223372036854775807 to 9223372036854775808 [-Wimplicit-const-int-float-conversion]
  398 |     if (!_Py_InIntegralTypeRange(_PyTime_t, d)) {
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./Include/pymath.h:228:82: note: expanded from macro '_Py_InIntegralTypeRange'
  228 | #define _Py_InIntegralTypeRange(type, v) (_Py_IntegralTypeMin(type) <= v && v <= _Py_IntegralTypeMax(type))
      |                                                                               ~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./Include/pymath.h:221:124: note: expanded from macro '_Py_IntegralTypeMax'
  221 | #define _Py_IntegralTypeMax(type) ((_Py_IntegralTypeSigned(type)) ? (((((type)1 << (sizeof(type)*CHAR_BIT - 2)) - 1) << 1) + 1) : ~(type)0)
      |                                                                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
3 warnings generated.
./Modules/signalmodule.c:663:9: warning: 'siginterrupt' is deprecated: Use sigaction with SA_RESTART instead [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
  663 |     if (siginterrupt(signalnum, flag)<0) {
      |         ^
/usr/include/signal.h:325:3: note: 'siginterrupt' has been explicitly marked deprecated here
  325 |   __attribute_deprecated_msg__ ("Use sigaction with SA_RESTART instead");
      |   ^
/usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:367:19: note: expanded from macro '__attribute_deprecated_msg__'
  367 |          __attribute__ ((__deprecated__ (msg)))
      |                          ^
1 warning generated.
./Modules/timemodule.c:125:13: warning: code will never be executed [-Wunreachable-code]
  125 |             PyErr_SetString(PyExc_OverflowError,
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 warning generated.
./Modules/_threadmodule.c:812:20: warning: unused variable 'tstate' [-Wunused-variable]
  812 |     PyThreadState *tstate;
      |                    ^~~~~~
./Modules/_threadmodule.c:1604:19: warning: implicit conversion from '_PyTime_t' (aka 'long') to 'double' changes value from 9223372036854775 to 9223372036854776 [-Wimplicit-const-int-float-conversion]
 1604 |     timeout_max = (_PyTime_t)PY_TIMEOUT_MAX * 1e-6;
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
2 warnings generated.
./Modules/_io/bufferedio.c:1075:19: warning: variable 'written' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
 1075 |     Py_ssize_t n, written = 0;
      |                   ^
./Modules/_io/bufferedio.c:1854:16: warning: variable 'written' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
 1854 |     Py_ssize_t written = 0;
      |                ^
2 warnings generated.
Objects/object.c:2209:5: runtime error: call to function list_dealloc through pointer to incorrect function type 'void (*)(struct _object *)'
/buildbot/buildarea/3.9.pablogsal-arch-x86_64.clang-ubsan/build/Objects/listobject.c:332: note: list_dealloc defined here
SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior Objects/object.c:2209:5 in 
make: *** [Makefile:618: pybuilddir.txt] Error 1

find: ‘build’: No such file or directory
find: ‘build’: No such file or directory
find: ‘build’: No such file or directory
find: ‘build’: No such file or directory
make: [Makefile:1888: clean-retain-profile] Error 1 (ignored)

@ambv ambv deleted the gh-121957-py39 branch July 22, 2024 15:13
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot AMD64 RHEL8 FIPS Only Blake2 Builtin Hash 3.9 has failed when building commit 9e9c71d.

What do you need to do:

  1. Don't panic.
  2. Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
  3. Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#builders/382/builds/663) and take a look at the build logs.
  4. Check if the failure is related to this commit (9e9c71d) or if it is a false positive.
  5. If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#builders/382/builds/663

Failed tests:

  • test_socket

Failed subtests:

  • test_hmac_sha1 - test.test_socket.LinuxKernelCryptoAPI

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

== Tests result: FAILURE then FAILURE ==

412 tests OK.

10 slowest tests:

  • test_gdb: 8 min 13 sec
  • test_concurrent_futures: 2 min 57 sec
  • test_capi: 2 min 8 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_spawn: 2 min 8 sec
  • test_unparse: 1 min 33 sec
  • test_tokenize: 1 min 32 sec
  • test_asyncio: 1 min 29 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_forkserver: 1 min 21 sec
  • test_mailbox: 1 min 17 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_fork: 1 min 8 sec

1 test failed:
test_socket

12 tests skipped:
test_devpoll test_ioctl test_kqueue test_msilib test_startfile
test_tix test_tk test_ttk_guionly test_winconsoleio test_winreg
test_winsound test_zipfile64

1 re-run test:
test_socket

Total duration: 10 min 46 sec

Click to see traceback logs 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.9.cstratak-RHEL8-fips-x86_64.no-builtin-hashes-except-blake2/build/Lib/test/test_socket.py", line 6281, in test_hmac_sha1
    algo.setsockopt(socket.SOL_ALG, socket.ALG_SET_KEY, b"Jefe")
OSError: [Errno 22] Invalid argument

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot s390x RHEL8 3.9 has failed when building commit 9e9c71d.

What do you need to do:

  1. Don't panic.
  2. Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
  3. Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#builders/490/builds/621) and take a look at the build logs.
  4. Check if the failure is related to this commit (9e9c71d) or if it is a false positive.
  5. If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#builders/490/builds/621

Failed tests:

  • test_zlib

Failed subtests:

  • test_pair - test.test_zlib.CompressObjectTestCase
  • test_speech128 - test.test_zlib.CompressTestCase

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

== Tests result: FAILURE then FAILURE ==

411 tests OK.

10 slowest tests:

  • test_concurrent_futures: 2 min 38 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_spawn: 2 min 7 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_forkserver: 1 min 15 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_fork: 1 min 13 sec
  • test_gdb: 58.3 sec
  • test_unparse: 55.2 sec
  • test_capi: 50.1 sec
  • test_tokenize: 48.6 sec
  • test_signal: 47.5 sec
  • test_asyncio: 45.4 sec

1 test failed:
test_zlib

13 tests skipped:
test_devpoll test_ioctl test_kqueue test_msilib test_nis
test_startfile test_tix test_tk test_ttk_guionly test_winconsoleio
test_winreg test_winsound test_zipfile64

1 re-run test:
test_zlib

Total duration: 5 min 12 sec

Click to see traceback logs 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z/build/Lib/multiprocessing/resource_tracker.py", line 201, in main
    cache[rtype].remove(name)
KeyError: '/psm_f975c4b3'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z/build/Lib/test/test_zlib.py", line 251, in test_pair
    self.assertEqual(x1 + x2, datazip)
AssertionError: b'x\x9c\xe2\xf2qt\r\nq\r\xe6\xe2R\x80\x00\x7f\x1d\x[97989 chars]\x95' != b'x\x9c\xe3\xf2qt\r\nq\r\xe6\xe2R\x80\x00\x7f\x1d\x[114656 chars]\x95'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z/build/Lib/multiprocessing/resource_tracker.py", line 201, in main
    cache[rtype].remove(name)
KeyError: '/psm_090f5c86'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z/build/Lib/multiprocessing/resource_tracker.py", line 201, in main
    cache[rtype].remove(name)
KeyError: '/psm_2071f297'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z/build/Lib/test/test_zlib.py", line 194, in test_speech128
    self.assertEqual(zlib.compress(bytearray(data)), x)
AssertionError: b'x\x[623 chars]x1c\xb8\x1b\x1d\xf3R@\xa2\n\x89E\xa9\xe00RO\x0[114355 chars]\x95' != b'x\x[623 chars]x1c\xa8\x1b\x81\xfe\xc9K\x01\x89*$\x16\xa5\x82[114033 chars]\x95'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z/build/Lib/test/test_zlib.py", line 251, in test_pair
    self.assertEqual(x1 + x2, datazip)
AssertionError: b'x\x9c\xe2\xf2qt\r\nq\r\xe6\xe2R\x80\x00\x7f\x1d\x[99070 chars]\x95' != b'x\x9c\xe3\xf2qt\r\nq\r\xe6\xe2R\x80\x00\x7f\x1d\x[114758 chars]\x95'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z/build/Lib/test/test_zlib.py", line 194, in test_speech128
    self.assertEqual(zlib.compress(bytearray(data)), x)
AssertionError: b'x\x[900 chars]4\x95B\x03\x11\x08\xfc\x80\xbeL\xcc\xabT(\xcd+[114047 chars]\x95' != b'x\x[900 chars]4\x95"\x02\xd1\x0f\xe8\xcb\xc4\xbcJ\x85\xd2\xb[113858 chars]\x95'

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot s390x RHEL8 LTO + PGO 3.9 has failed when building commit 9e9c71d.

What do you need to do:

  1. Don't panic.
  2. Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
  3. Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#builders/436/builds/621) and take a look at the build logs.
  4. Check if the failure is related to this commit (9e9c71d) or if it is a false positive.
  5. If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#builders/436/builds/621

Failed tests:

  • test_zlib

Failed subtests:

  • test_pair - test.test_zlib.CompressObjectTestCase
  • test_speech128 - test.test_zlib.CompressTestCase

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

== Tests result: FAILURE then FAILURE ==

410 tests OK.

10 slowest tests:

  • test_concurrent_futures: 2 min 24 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_spawn: 1 min 25 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_forkserver: 1 min 10 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_fork: 1 min 2 sec
  • test_signal: 47.0 sec
  • test_asyncio: 37.0 sec
  • test_io: 34.6 sec
  • test_imaplib: 31.9 sec
  • test_pydoc: 30.8 sec
  • test_socket: 27.4 sec

1 test failed:
test_zlib

14 tests skipped:
test_devpoll test_gdb test_ioctl test_kqueue test_msilib test_nis
test_startfile test_tix test_tk test_ttk_guionly test_winconsoleio
test_winreg test_winsound test_zipfile64

1 re-run test:
test_zlib

Total duration: 3 min 19 sec

Click to see traceback logs 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z.lto-pgo/build/Lib/test/test_zlib.py", line 194, in test_speech128
    self.assertEqual(zlib.compress(bytearray(data)), x)
AssertionError: b'x\x[2610 chars]e\xcc<\xa0\xea\xf2<\xb0-I\xc0h,B\xca\xc4 +\x80[112255 chars]\x95' != b'x\x[2610 chars]e\xcc\xbcT\x85\xfc\xf2<\xb0-I\xc0h,B\xca\xc4 +[111390 chars]\x95'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z.lto-pgo/build/Lib/multiprocessing/resource_tracker.py", line 201, in main
    cache[rtype].remove(name)
KeyError: '/psm_2fffc3b5'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z.lto-pgo/build/Lib/test/test_zlib.py", line 194, in test_speech128
    self.assertEqual(zlib.compress(bytearray(data)), x)
AssertionError: b'x\x[2957 chars]x94\x82\xad\xa8\x86\x97\xba%\x99\xb9\xa9@+\xca[111722 chars]\x95' != b'x\x[2957 chars]x94\xa2\x07\xd4\x89^T\xc3K\xdd\x92\xcc\xdcT\xa[112963 chars]\x95'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z.lto-pgo/build/Lib/test/test_zlib.py", line 251, in test_pair
    self.assertEqual(x1 + x2, datazip)
AssertionError: b'x\x9c\xe2\xf2qt\r\nq\r\xe6\xe2R\x80\x00\x7f\x1d\x[99621 chars]\x95' != b'x\x9c\xe3\xf2qt\r\nq\r\xe6\xe2R\x80\x00\x7f\x1d\x[114000 chars]\x95'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z.lto-pgo/build/Lib/multiprocessing/resource_tracker.py", line 201, in main
    cache[rtype].remove(name)
KeyError: '/psm_ff64acd0'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z.lto-pgo/build/Lib/test/test_zlib.py", line 251, in test_pair
    self.assertEqual(x1 + x2, datazip)
AssertionError: b'x\x9c\xe2\xf2qt\r\nq\r\xe6\xe2R\x80\x00\x7f\x1d\x[98627 chars]\x95' != b'x\x9c\xe3\xf2qt\r\nq\r\xe6\xe2R\x80\x00\x7f\x1d\x[115920 chars]\x95'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z.lto-pgo/build/Lib/multiprocessing/resource_tracker.py", line 201, in main
    cache[rtype].remove(name)
KeyError: '/psm_56c0c851'

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot s390x RHEL8 LTO 3.9 has failed when building commit 9e9c71d.

What do you need to do:

  1. Don't panic.
  2. Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
  3. Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#builders/281/builds/621) and take a look at the build logs.
  4. Check if the failure is related to this commit (9e9c71d) or if it is a false positive.
  5. If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#builders/281/builds/621

Failed tests:

  • test_zlib

Failed subtests:

  • test_pair - test.test_zlib.CompressObjectTestCase
  • test_speech128 - test.test_zlib.CompressTestCase

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

== Tests result: FAILURE then FAILURE ==

411 tests OK.

10 slowest tests:

  • test_concurrent_futures: 2 min 22 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_spawn: 1 min 36 sec
  • test_gdb: 1 min 17 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_forkserver: 1 min 14 sec
  • test_multiprocessing_fork: 1 min 9 sec
  • test_signal: 47.1 sec
  • test_asyncio: 36.7 sec
  • test_io: 35.0 sec
  • test_imaplib: 31.8 sec
  • test_peg_generator: 31.1 sec

1 test failed:
test_zlib

13 tests skipped:
test_devpoll test_ioctl test_kqueue test_msilib test_nis
test_startfile test_tix test_tk test_ttk_guionly test_winconsoleio
test_winreg test_winsound test_zipfile64

1 re-run test:
test_zlib

Total duration: 4 min 50 sec

Click to see traceback logs 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z.lto/build/Lib/multiprocessing/resource_tracker.py", line 201, in main
    cache[rtype].remove(name)
KeyError: '/psm_1a61a41b'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z.lto/build/Lib/test/test_zlib.py", line 194, in test_speech128
    self.assertEqual(zlib.compress(bytearray(data)), x)
AssertionError: b'x\x[4346 chars]8\xa6z\xa4W\xc0\xc4V\xc00\xbf\x10[\x01\xc3t\xc[111116 chars]\x95' != b'x\x[4346 chars]8\xa6\x1aV\x01\xa7\x8e\xf0\n\x98P\x05\x0c\xf3\[110618 chars]\x95'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z.lto/build/Lib/test/test_zlib.py", line 251, in test_pair
    self.assertEqual(x1 + x2, datazip)
AssertionError: b'x\x9c\xe2\xf2qt\r\nq\r\xe6\xe2R\x80\x00\x7f\x1d\x[101591 chars]\x95' != b'x\x9c\xe3\xf2qt\r\nq\r\xe6\xe2R\x80\x00\x7f\x1d\x[114964 chars]\x95'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z.lto/build/Lib/multiprocessing/resource_tracker.py", line 201, in main
    cache[rtype].remove(name)
KeyError: '/psm_36e63f1d'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z.lto/build/Lib/multiprocessing/resource_tracker.py", line 201, in main
    cache[rtype].remove(name)
KeyError: '/psm_678a60d9'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z.lto/build/Lib/test/test_zlib.py", line 194, in test_speech128
    self.assertEqual(zlib.compress(bytearray(data)), x)
AssertionError: b'x\x[3514 chars]x80\x89\xad\x80\xe1\x9a\xa1\x15p*\xb4\x02N\x85[110762 chars]\x95' != b'x\x[3514 chars]x80\xd1+`\\\x150\\3\xb4\x02N\x85V\xc0\xa9\xd0\[112318 chars]\x95'


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.9.edelsohn-rhel8-z.lto/build/Lib/test/test_zlib.py", line 251, in test_pair
    self.assertEqual(x1 + x2, datazip)
AssertionError: b'x\x9c\xe2\xf2qt\r\nq\r\xe6\xe2R\x80\x00\x7f\x1d\x[99395 chars]\x95' != b'x\x9c\xe3\xf2qt\r\nq\r\xe6\xe2R\x80\x00\x7f\x1d\x[115832 chars]\x95'

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@1st1 1st1 Awaiting requested review from 1st1 1st1 is a code owner

@asvetlov asvetlov Awaiting requested review from asvetlov asvetlov is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@ambv @bedevere-bot