Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Re-integrate Sphinx's linkcheck into CI configuration #12932
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Re-integrate Sphinx's linkcheck into CI configuration #12932
Changes from 11 commits
d60d253
024917a
1cb2f70
9e5a6a1
e7b64e9
029fb15
b95e56f
9777e1b
3f2e0c9
0bb4166
3ea3e2f
22f5296
683121f
7128c3d
cabba81
b4655f9
3e48d69
dfaada7
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This matches any project page starting with
pytest
. Likepytesty
. Why? I don't think I've seen any problems with this host in linkcheck in the past.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this necessary? I don't remember such URLs not working in other projects.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is from the original version. But you're right, this doesn't trigger any issues with link.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Without
r"https://github\.com/sponsors/.*",
checking will trigger issues:WARNING: broken link: https://github.com/sponsors/xxx (429 Client Error: Too Many Requests for url: https://github.com/xxx)
It seems to be related to missing credentials or tokens for GitHub but I'm not 100% sure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With
xxx
specifically, I suppose? How about with real existing usernames?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should probably be more accurate. Such a wildcard would also silence obviously broken URLs like https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/pull/zombie that should produce errors otherwise.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What are the defaults of these?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sphinx-issues
is already listed belowThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FIxed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could you keep such formatting changes out?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FIxed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if this should instead just reference the requirements file or the base section value...