-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move to AggregateFunctionExpr #36
Conversation
…ggregateFunctionExpr struct
@@ -55,4 +55,4 @@ serde_json = "1" | |||
base64 = "0.22.1" | |||
chrono = { version = "0.4.38", default-features = false } | |||
itertools = "0.13" | |||
pyo3 = { version = "0.21.2", features = ["experimental-async"] } | |||
pyo3 = { version = "0.22.2", features = ["experimental-async"] } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
did this dep need to be updated? I think datafusion-python currently requires pyo3 0.21
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yep. the latest DF depends on arrow 53.0.0, which needs a bump for pyo3
@@ -225,7 +227,7 @@ impl StreamingWindowExec { | |||
&input.schema(), | |||
group_by.expr(), | |||
&aggr_expr, | |||
group_by.contains_null(), | |||
false, //group_by.contains_null(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what's up with this comment?
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ name = "denormalized_python" | |||
crate-type = ["cdylib"] | |||
|
|||
[dependencies] | |||
pyo3 = { version = "0.21.2", features = ["experimental-async"] } | |||
pyo3 = { workspace = true } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
did we need pyo3 out of the py-denormalized crate?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes we did. cargo update
doesn't work otherwise because it goes down a circular resolver path.
No description provided.