Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move to AggregateFunctionExpr #36

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ameyc
Copy link
Contributor

@ameyc ameyc commented Sep 7, 2024

No description provided.

@ameyc ameyc requested a review from emgeee September 7, 2024 00:08
@@ -55,4 +55,4 @@ serde_json = "1"
base64 = "0.22.1"
chrono = { version = "0.4.38", default-features = false }
itertools = "0.13"
pyo3 = { version = "0.21.2", features = ["experimental-async"] }
pyo3 = { version = "0.22.2", features = ["experimental-async"] }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

did this dep need to be updated? I think datafusion-python currently requires pyo3 0.21

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yep. the latest DF depends on arrow 53.0.0, which needs a bump for pyo3

@@ -225,7 +227,7 @@ impl StreamingWindowExec {
&input.schema(),
group_by.expr(),
&aggr_expr,
group_by.contains_null(),
false, //group_by.contains_null(),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what's up with this comment?

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ name = "denormalized_python"
crate-type = ["cdylib"]

[dependencies]
pyo3 = { version = "0.21.2", features = ["experimental-async"] }
pyo3 = { workspace = true }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

did we need pyo3 out of the py-denormalized crate?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ameyc ameyc Sep 9, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes we did. cargo update doesn't work otherwise because it goes down a circular resolver path.

@ameyc ameyc merged commit f1cd05b into main Sep 9, 2024
2 checks passed
@ameyc ameyc deleted the upgrade-to-aggregate-function-expr branch September 9, 2024 19:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants