Fix for loop structure to improve readability

[0xwitty]

Description

This update refactors the loop to use a more concise arrow function, which improves the clarity of the code. Previously, the numberOfLeaves variable was defined with a broader scope, but by using a const inside the loop, its scope is now limited to the loop's iteration. This small change not only enhances code readability but also helps prevent potential issues related to variable scope, making the code easier to maintain in the future.

Checklist

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have run yarn style without getting any errors
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

[0xDatapunk]

nice

[cedoor]

Hi @0xwitty! What's the point of keeping let numberOfLeaves: number? Can we remove it?

[sripwoud]

If we start refactoring...
I think the logic is simple enough to avoid declaring numberOfLeaves altogether