Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: use strings for metadata on contracts #344

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

ctrlc03
Copy link
Collaborator

@ctrlc03 ctrlc03 commented Sep 17, 2024

Use strings for metadata pointers (note that strings in events to be indexed will be converted to its hash thus bytes32, hence why indexed was removed)

fix shadowing of recipients in EASRegistry

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 17, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
maci-platform ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 17, 2024 9:18am

function addRecipients(Recipient[] calldata recipients) external onlyOwner {
uint256 length = recipients.length;
/// @param _recipients The recipients
function addRecipients(Recipient[] calldata _recipients) external onlyOwner {

Check warning

Code scanning / Slither

Conformance to Solidity naming conventions Warning

Copy link
Contributor

@kittybest kittybest left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, thanks! also successfully deployed poll and registry contract with long metadataurl now.

@ctrlc03 ctrlc03 force-pushed the chore/strings-for-metadata branch from e613253 to 4ae7545 Compare September 17, 2024 09:01
@ctrlc03 ctrlc03 enabled auto-merge September 17, 2024 09:04
@ctrlc03 ctrlc03 merged commit d8b4d1c into main Sep 17, 2024
16 checks passed
@ctrlc03 ctrlc03 deleted the chore/strings-for-metadata branch September 17, 2024 09:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants