Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adds SpecifiedLegalOrganization #28

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Mar 10, 2024

Conversation

MAKOMO
Copy link
Contributor

@MAKOMO MAKOMO commented Jan 22, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.51%. Comparing base (4019506) to head (3211332).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #28      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.09%   90.51%   -0.59%     
==========================================
  Files          17       17              
  Lines        1382     1392      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits         1259     1260       +1     
- Misses        123      132       +9     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -59,6 +59,22 @@ class Meta:
tag = "EmailURIUniversalCommunication"


class LegalOrganization(Element):
id = StringField(NS_RAM, "ID", required=False, profile=BASIC)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe this should be an IDField as it reads type="udt:IDType" in the spec which allows for an optional schemeID. There are other places where StringFields might need to be promoted to IDFields.

"TradingBusinessName",
required=False,
profile=BASIC,
_d="Name, unter dem der Käufers bekannt ist",
Copy link

@bwurst bwurst Jan 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please fix the typo "Käufers" here? ;-)
btw, this scheme is to be used for seller and buyer. Maybe just "Firmenname, sofern abweichend vom Name" will fit better?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did but in my fork, but my commits are not synced with this PR. I tried somethings already (close-reopen RP, set different base and back), but nothing worked. Any idea how I could get this PR back in sync with the source branch in my fork?

@MAKOMO MAKOMO closed this Jan 29, 2024
@MAKOMO MAKOMO reopened this Jan 29, 2024
@MAKOMO MAKOMO changed the base branch from master to 2 January 29, 2024 18:44
@MAKOMO MAKOMO changed the base branch from 2 to master January 29, 2024 18:44
drafthorse/models/party.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
drafthorse/models/party.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@raphaelm raphaelm merged commit 3171067 into pretix:master Mar 10, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants