Use the ruff formatter, instead of black #343
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The ruff formatter seems to gain traction. Replacing black with ruff means one less tool to depend on. I have based this commit on: - ruff-pre-commit README.md | Using Ruff with pre-commit https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit/blob/main/README.md - The Ruff Formatter | Conflicting lint rules https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/formatter/#conflicting-lint-rules
DimitriPapadopoulos
force-pushed
the
black_ruff
branch
from
f548fe4
to
52b332e
Compare
DimitriPapadopoulos
force-pushed
the
black_ruff
branch
from
c498ba6
to
b5093a0
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The ruff formatter seems to gain traction. Replacing black with ruff means one less tool to depend on.
I have based this commit on:
Also add new ruff linter rules.