Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Power Control for Applications and Tools #26

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Power Control for Applications and Tools #26

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

rhc54
Copy link
Member

@rhc54 rhc54 commented Dec 4, 2017

Power control of high-performance computing clusters is of growing interest among large-scale systems and power-constrained installations. A preliminary API specification has been published that provides atomistic control and measurement functions. This RFC provides an abstraction layer that also simplifies the interfaces.

Signed-off-by: Ralph Castain [email protected]

Power control of high-performance computing clusters is of growing interest among large-scale systems and power-constrained installations. A preliminary API [specification](http://powerapi.sandia.gov/) has been published that provides atomistic control and measurement functions. This RFC provides an abstraction layer that also simplifies the interfaces.

Signed-off-by: Ralph Castain <[email protected]>
Ralph Castain added 2 commits December 4, 2017 16:15
Signed-off-by: Ralph Castain <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Castain <[email protected]>
@rhc54 rhc54 added this to the v3.0 milestone Dec 5, 2017
@abouteiller
Copy link

The interface and constant are very Linux specific. It would be interesting to verify what BSD and other OS do and try to extract commonalities.

@rhc54 rhc54 modified the milestones: v3.0, v4.0 Jun 7, 2018
@jjhursey
Copy link
Member

This RFC has not been merged into the PMIx standard document.

A PMIx Standard Use Case Issue needs to be defined for it in the pmix-standard repo with a link back to this PR. Then this PR can be closed out.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants