Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Small buffer pass optimization as discussed in #395. #402

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 7, 2022

Conversation

martinnj
Copy link
Contributor

@martinnj martinnj commented Jun 7, 2022

Basically ensure the client only does one pass over the buffer instead of two.
Exact thread: #395 (comment)

@martinnj martinnj force-pushed the patch/readline-optimization branch from 2f6756e to 9d9c1e9 Compare June 7, 2022 13:57
pymemcache/client/base.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jparise jparise merged commit 43349a4 into pinterest:master Jun 7, 2022
@jparise
Copy link
Collaborator

jparise commented Jun 7, 2022

Thank you!

@martinnj martinnj deleted the patch/readline-optimization branch June 8, 2022 05:12
martinnj added a commit to martinnj/pymemcache that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2022
…est#402)

Basically ensure the client only does one pass over the buffer instead of two.
Exact thread: pinterest#395 (comment)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants