Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update vitest monorepo to v2 (major) #573

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
vite-node (source) 1.6.0 -> 2.0.1 age adoption passing confidence
vitest (source) 1.6.0 -> 2.0.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

vitest-dev/vitest (vite-node)

v2.0.1

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v2.0.0

Compare Source

Vitest 2.0 is here! This release page lists all changes made to the project during the beta. For the migration guide, please refer to the documentation.

🚨 Breaking Changes
🚀 Features
Running tresjs example in Vitest BrowserMode
🐞 Bug Fixes
View changes on GitHub

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "on the first saturday of the month" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-vitest-monorepo branch from 6679dbb to 3167972 Compare July 8, 2024 21:39
@renovate renovate bot merged commit 08aa18c into main Jul 9, 2024
1 check passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/major-vitest-monorepo branch July 9, 2024 00:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants