Remove the portion of patches to Private Aggregation that got incorprorated there.

[morlovich]

See WICG/turtledove#1297

---

Preview | Diff

[morlovich]

Hi @alexmturner, could you perhaps review this? It's the mirror of the other change..

[alexmturner]

Thanks, LGTM!

[alexmturner]

Unfortunately, this seems to have a couple compiling issues, due to the following not being defined/exported any more:

• [=interest group/Private Aggregation coordinator=]
• [=auction config/seller Private Aggregation coordinator=]
• [=auction config/auction report buyers=]
• [=auction config/auction report buyer keys=]
• [=auction config/auction report buyer debug details=]

Maybe we keep these defined in the spec temporarily just to avoid the errors?

It's also complaining about having multiple definitions for:

• {{AuctionReportBuyersConfig/bucket}}
• {{AuctionReportBuyersConfig/scale}}

but I think that must just be caching issue? You removed those definitions in this pr...

[morlovich]

Huh, did something happen with our auction config/interest group exports? Investigating. I feel like I did do a test build of this before mailing.

Edit: they do have , so either that doesn't work the way I think it does or something else is up?

Anyway, it might be easier to just wait until the entire section is removed.

[alexmturner]

I think the auction config/interest group pieces were defined in this spec so they didn't need to be exported. But they're still used in the remaining monkey patches. Alternatively, we could modify them to e.g. <a spec="turtledove" for="auction config">auction report buyers</a>, but that seems maybe laborious

[morlovich]

I think the auction config/interest group pieces were defined in this spec so they didn't need to be exported. But they're still used in the remaining monkey patches. Alternatively, we could modify them to e.g. <a spec="turtledove" for="auction config">auction report buyers</a>, but that seems maybe laborious

Probably not worth the effort since they should be going away shortly.

[alexmturner]

Yeah, agreed -- probably easiest to just revert the changes under the "Structures" heading for now.