statement-distribution: prep for re-enabling #4431
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ordian
added
the
T8-polkadot
ordian
commented
May 10, 2024
tdimitrov
approved these changes
May 14, 2024
* master: improve MockValidationDataInherentDataProvider to support async backing (#4442) Bump `proc-macro-crate` to the latest version (#4409) [ci] Run check-runtime-migration in GHA (#4441) prospective-parachains rework (#4035) [ci] Add forklift to GHA ARC (#4372) `CheckWeight` SE: Check for extrinsic length + proof size combined (#4326) Add generate and verify logic for `AncestryProof` (#4430) Rococo AH: undeploy trie migration (#4414) Remove `substrate-frame-cli` (#4403) migrations: `take()`should consume read and write operation weight (#4302) `remote-externalities`: store block header in snapshot (#4349) xcm-emlator: Use `BlockNumberFor` instead of `parachains_common::BlockNumber=u32` (#4434) Remove `pallet::getter` usage from authority-discovery pallet (#4091) Remove pallet::getter usage from pallet-contracts-mock-network (#4417) Add docs to request_core_count (#4423)
Overkillus
reviewed
May 23, 2024
| validator_index = ?statement.unchecked_validator_index(), | ||
| "Ignoring a statement from disabled validator." | ||
| ); | ||
| modify_reputation(reputation, ctx.sender(), peer, COST_DISABLED_VALIDATOR).await; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In general we want it for sure. I if it poses network fragmentation risks on different node version interacting.
Thinking in context of only a fraction of the network updating. Those are node changes mostly so very likely it will go like that.
Ths change means that new nodes will be generally considering themselves disabled later - only when it gets to the relay parent rather then leaf. So consider validator A that was disabled in some leaf. Validator A updated to new node with relay parent disabling. He got disabled in one of the leafs already but A does not yet see it as it hasn't yet been in the relay parent. That means he might be sending statements and old nodes that consider him disabled will rep punish him. Potential fragmentation risk?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Might not be enough rep damages to be a problem but just highlighting the possibility
Overkillus
approved these changes
May 23, 2024
* master: (93 commits) Fix broken windows build (#4636) Beefy client generic on aduthority Id (#1816) pallet-staking: Put tests behind `cfg(debug_assertions)` (#4620) Broker new price adapter (#4521) Change `XcmDryRunApi::dry_run_extrinsic` to take a call instead (#4621) Update README.md (#4623) Publish `chain-spec-builder` (#4518) Add omni bencher & chain-spec-builder bins to release (#4557) Moves runtime macro out of experimental flag (#4249) Filter workspace dependencies in the templates (#4599) parachain-inherent: Make `para_id` more prominent (#4555) Add metric to measure the time it takes to gather enough assignments (#4587) Improve On_demand_assigner events (#4339) Conditional `required` checks (#4544) [CI] Deny adding git deps (#4572) [subsytem-bench] Remove redundant banchmark_name param (#4540) Add availability-recovery from systematic chunks (#1644) Remove workspace lints from templates (#4598) `sc-chain-spec`: deprecated code removed (#4410) [subsystem-benchmarks] Add statement-distribution benchmarks (#3863) ...
TarekkMA
pushed a commit
to moonbeam-foundation/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 2, 2024
In preparation for launching re-enabling (paritytech#2418), we need to adjust the disabling strategy of statement-distribution to use the relay parent's state instead of the latest state (union of active leaves). This will also ensure no raciness of getting the latest state vs accepting statements from disabling validators at the cost of being more lenient/potentially accepting more statements from disabled validators. - [x] PRDoc
This was referenced Aug 21, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In preparation for launching re-enabling (#2418), we need to adjust the disabling strategy of statement-distribution to use the relay parent's state instead of the latest state (union of active leaves). This will also ensure no raciness of getting the latest state vs accepting statements from disabling validators at the cost of being more lenient/potentially accepting more statements from disabled validators.