-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🚀 Add information to app summary output for what will be run on --commit (#27) #53
Conversation
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #53 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 95.24% 95.24% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 19 19
Lines 2336 2357 +21
==========================================
+ Hits 2225 2245 +20
- Misses 111 112 +1
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Thanks for the PR. It's getting a good shape. (1) When analyses are protected:
(2) When analyses are NOT protected:
This way in the default scenario where analyses are protected we don't need to detailed each one of the skipped ones saying (Protected). |
I think I still prefer the message saying something like this for
You could remove the listing of what was skipped if that's too verbose. |
to be more explicit, what I'm suggesting (incorporating your feedback @juanesarango) would be: 1. Results Unprotected
2. Results Protected
Although, I think it could actually be nice to have a summary after running with |
Another comment I have, that is sort of related, is that I would actually prefer it if Isabl didn't insert analysis rows into the database until What do you think of something like:
edit: #55 |
@juanesarango I just noticed that the cli already prints this at the end of a non-commit run:
so we would end up with something like this?
Perhaps the new wording should be changed then? maybe |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great work @Keimya! Thanks a lot for the contribution! 🙌🏽
app.py
In the first invocation without running commit:
In the second invocation upon --commit:
scenarios run for protected and unprotected results, and when commit = True and commit = False
test_app.py
def test_commit_description added
def test_get_experiments_from_default_cli_options modified
🐛 Bug fix
🚀 New feature
🔧 Code refactor
📘 I have updated the documentation accordingly
✅ I have added tests to cover my changes