-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 638
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Restore some opentelemetry module mappings #20749
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@purajit thanks for catching these typos! Can you verify that this looks better? |
tdyas
approved these changes
Apr 4, 2024
Yup, we're back! |
WorkerPants
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2024
Several of mappings for opentelemetry packages were added/adjusted in #20551 and then adjusted more in #20705, but the second adjustment was based on the default fallback mapping replacing `-` with `.`, but it actually replaces them with `_`. This restores explicit mappings for the following (where I've downloaded the wheels and verified their contents): - `opentelemetry-exporter-otlp` - `opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-grpc` - `opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http` - `opentelemetry-sdk` These were originally added in #16337, released in 2.14.0, so this would be a notable regression if we released 2.20.0 without them. Noticed in #20705 (comment)
I tried to automatically cherry-pick this change back to each relevant milestone, so that it is available in those older releases of Pants. ✔️ 2.20.xSuccessfully opened #20753. Thanks again for your contributions! |
huonw
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2024
…20753) Several of mappings for opentelemetry packages were added/adjusted in #20551 and then adjusted more in #20705, but the second adjustment was based on the default fallback mapping replacing `-` with `.`, but it actually replaces them with `_`. This restores explicit mappings for the following (where I've downloaded the wheels and verified their contents): - `opentelemetry-exporter-otlp` - `opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-grpc` - `opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http` - `opentelemetry-sdk` These were originally added in #16337, released in 2.14.0, so this would be a notable regression if we released 2.20.0 without them. Noticed in #20705 (comment) Co-authored-by: Huon Wilson <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Several of mappings for opentelemetry packages were added/adjusted in #20551 and then adjusted more in #20705, but the second adjustment was based on the default fallback mapping replacing
-
with.
, but it actually replaces them with_
. This restores explicit mappings for the following (where I've downloaded the wheels and verified their contents):opentelemetry-exporter-otlp
opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-grpc
opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http
opentelemetry-sdk
These were originally added in #16337, released in 2.14.0, so this would be a notable regression if we released 2.20.0 without them.
Noticed in #20705 (comment)