Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PAGOPA-1470 moving to java 17 #34

Conversation

FedericoRuzzier
Copy link

List of Changes

Moving to java 17

Motivation and Context

Needed in order to use a not deprecated jdk

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested manually

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@FedericoRuzzier FedericoRuzzier added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 23, 2024
Copy link

Comment this PR with update_code to update openapi.json and format the code. Consider to use pre-commit to format the code.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jan 23, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link
Collaborator

@alessio-acitelli alessio-acitelli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good job 👍

@FedericoRuzzier FedericoRuzzier merged commit 658d901 into main Jan 25, 2024
14 checks passed
@FedericoRuzzier FedericoRuzzier deleted the PAGOPA-1470-sviluppo-afm-utils-e-afm-calculator-migrazione-java-17 branch January 25, 2024 09:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request size/small
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants