Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
First Commit abhisheks008#945
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
pacificrm committed Oct 31, 2024
1 parent 9eafa67 commit ae6a44f
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 9 changed files with 6,292 additions and 0 deletions.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
Dataset : https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/pacificrm/skindiseasedataset/data
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
# 🧴 Skin Disease Classification with Deep Learning 🧴

> A comparative analysis of 10 different deep learning models for skin disease classification.
## 🎯 Goal

The aim of this project is to classify images of skin diseases into different categories by comparing various state-of-the-art deep learning architectures. We evaluated ten models, including transfer learning with pre-trained ImageNet weights, and identified the best-performing model for this specific task.

## 📊 Dataset

The dataset used for this project can be found on Kaggle: [Skin Disease Dataset](https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/pacificrm/skindiseasedataset/data). This dataset contains images of different types of skin diseases, providing a valuable resource for training and evaluating the model's performance.

### 🌐 Comprehensive Collection

This dataset comprises a diverse collection of images representing various skin diseases. The dataset images are categorized into 22 distinct classes, each corresponding to a specific skin condition.

### 🌈 Diverse Skin Conditions

The following are the classes included in the dataset:

- **Acne**
- **Actinic Keratosis**
- **Benign Tumors**
- **Bullous**
- **Candidiasis**
- **Drug Eruption**
- **Eczema**
- **Infestations/Bites**
- **Lichen**
- **Lupus**
- **Moles**
- **Psoriasis**
- **Rosacea**
- **Seborrheic Keratoses**
- **Skin Cancer**
- **Sun/Sunlight Damage**
- **Tinea**
- **Unknown/Normal**
- **Vascular Tumors**
- **Vasculitis**
- **Vitiligo**
- **Warts**

### 📷 Data Visualization and Class Distribution

We visualized the data to understand the sample characteristics for each class of skin disease. The following plots illustrate sample images and the class distribution:

1. **Data Visualization**
![Data Visualization](../Images/data_visualization.png)

2. **Class Distribution**
![Class Distribution](../Images/class_distribution.png)

## 🧠 Models Used

In this project, we evaluated the following ten deep learning architectures:

1. **VGG16**
2. **ResNet**
3. **InceptionV3**
4. **Xception**
5. **InceptionResNetV2**
6. **MobileNet**
7. **ResNet50**
8. **SEResNet**
9. **EfficientNet**
10. **Vision Transformer (ViT)**

Each model (except SEResNet) utilized pre-trained weights from ImageNet, which provided a strong starting point for training. We observed that SEResNet, due to its lack of pre-training, performed significantly worse compared to other models. Among the models evaluated, **Vision Transformer (ViT)** yielded the best results in terms of both accuracy and generalization.

## 📈 Results

### 🔍 Performance Metrics

We compared each model on the following metrics:

- **Loss**: Tracking the loss during training and validation helped identify the stability of each model's learning process.
- **Accuracy**: The primary metric used to gauge model performance.
- **Top-2 Accuracy**: Provided insight into cases where the model's second choice was also relevant.

The following plots provide a comparative visualization for each model's performance:

1. **Loss**
![Loss Plot](../Images/loss_plot.png)
2. **Accuracy**
![Accuracy Plot](../Images/accuracy_plot.png)
3. **Top-2 Accuracy**
![Top-2 Accuracy Plot](../Images/top2_accuracy_plot.png)

## 🚀 How to Run

To replicate this analysis, clone the repository and follow these steps:

1. Install the required dependencies:
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
2. Now you can run each cell of Notebook.

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
tensorflow==2.12.0
keras==2.12.0
matplotlib==3.7.1
numpy==1.23.5
pandas==1.5.3
scikit-learn==1.2.2
seaborn==0.12.2
opencv-python==4.7.0.72
imghdr

0 comments on commit ae6a44f

Please sign in to comment.