You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed if the input FASTQ set does not include all the tags listed in the config file, then the the tag_qc object in summary JSON file (i.e. the one generated by -s) will not terminate properly, causing issues for downstream operations.
The attached files are the FASTQ inputs, summary JSON, and config file for the following:
splitcode -c tags.txt --x-only -C 1 -N 3 -t 2 --summary /home/data_datastore/Analysis/[...]/new_local/s8_summary.json exp000705_sample_8_S8_L001_I1_001.fastq.gz exp000705_sample_8_S8_L001_R1_001.fastq.gz exp000705_sample_8_S8_L001_R2_001.fastq.gz
* Using a list of 341 tags (vector size: 341; map size: 12,832; num elements in map: 12,881)
* will process sample 1: sample_8_S8_L001_I1_001.fastq.gz
sample_8_S8_L001_R1_001.fastq.gz
sample_8_S8_L001_R2_001.fastq.gz
* processing the reads ...
done
* processed 105 reads
When attempting to read s8_summary.json using standard Python protocol in python 3.10:
with open("s8_summary.json", 'rt') as fp:
... json.load(fp)
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 2, in <module>
File "/home/jma/miniconda3/envs/base/lib/python3.10/json/__init__.py", line 293, in load
return loads(fp.read(),
File "/home/jma/miniconda3/envs/base/lib/python3.10/json/__init__.py", line 346, in loads
return _default_decoder.decode(s)
File "/home/jma/miniconda3/envs/base/lib/python3.10/json/decoder.py", line 337, in decode
obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end())
File "/home/jma/miniconda3/envs/base/lib/python3.10/json/decoder.py", line 355, in raw_decode
raise JSONDecodeError("Expecting value", s, err.value) from None
json.decoder.JSONDecodeError: Expecting value: line 235 column 2 (char 10629)
Comparing this file with the summary JSONs that work properly, I noticed the following in the final lines:
Removing the comma at the end of the third last line of s8_summary.json causes restores compatibility with Python. I wonder if that's more of a Python issue, or a bug on splitcode's summary output code?
I noticed if the input FASTQ set does not include all the tags listed in the config file, then the the
tag_qc
object in summary JSON file (i.e. the one generated by-s
) will not terminate properly, causing issues for downstream operations.The attached files are the FASTQ inputs, summary JSON, and config file for the following:
When attempting to read
s8_summary.json
using standard Python protocol in python 3.10:Comparing this file with the summary JSONs that work properly, I noticed the following in the final lines:
whereas the last 3 lines of a summary file that work normally look like this:
Removing the comma at the end of the third last line of
s8_summary.json
causes restores compatibility with Python. I wonder if that's more of a Python issue, or a bug on splitcode's summary output code?sample_8_S8_L001_I1_001.fastq.gz
sample_8_S8_L001_R1_001.fastq.gz
sample_8_S8_L001_R2_001.fastq.gz
s8_summary.json
tags.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: