Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ci: uploading coverage to Codecov #62

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 24, 2024
Merged

ci: uploading coverage to Codecov #62

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 24, 2024

Conversation

snuffkin
Copy link
Collaborator

✍ Description

I modified python-ci.yaml to perform the following steps

  • Run pytest for common, user, and provider, and upload-artifact each .coverage
  • Download-artifact each .coverage and execute the coverage combine command
  • Output the xml and upload it to Codecov

As a result of this, I modified Makefile, .gitignore, and pyptorjct.yaml

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ci Adding or updating CI configuration and scripts label Dec 23, 2024
orangekame3
orangekame3 approved these changes Dec 24, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@orangekame3 orangekame3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@orangekame3 orangekame3 merged commit 90b5357 into develop Dec 24, 2024
1 check passed
@orangekame3 orangekame3 deleted the feature/codecov branch December 24, 2024 05:52
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Dec 24, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@orangekame3 orangekame3 orangekame3 approved these changes

@shgokita shgokita Awaiting requested review from shgokita shgokita is a code owner

Assignees

@snuffkin snuffkin

Labels
ci Adding or updating CI configuration and scripts
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@snuffkin @orangekame3