Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #5284: Revert "Fix: #5186: MissingDefaultResource + AppCompatCustomView + FragmentTagUsage" #5287

Conversation

adhiamboperes
Copy link
Collaborator

Fix #5284: Reverts #5191. See issue for details.

This should be a clean revert.

Copy link
Member

@BenHenning BenHenning left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @adhiamboperes! LGTM.

@BenHenning BenHenning enabled auto-merge (squash) December 23, 2023 08:04
Copy link

oppiabot bot commented Dec 23, 2023

Unassigning @BenHenning since they have already approved the PR.

@oppiabot oppiabot bot added the PR: LGTM label Dec 23, 2023
Copy link

oppiabot bot commented Dec 23, 2023

Hi @adhiamboperes, this PR is ready to be merged. Please address any remaining comments prior to merging, and feel free to merge this PR once the CI checks pass and you're happy with it. Thanks!

@BenHenning BenHenning merged commit 658c596 into develop Dec 23, 2023
43 checks passed
@BenHenning BenHenning deleted the revert-5191-fix/missingDefaultResource-appCompatCustomView-fragmentTagUsage branch December 23, 2023 09:03
BenHenning pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2023
…omView + FragmentTagUsage" (#5287)

Fix #5284: Reverts #5191. See issue for details.

This should be a clean revert.
BenHenning added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2023
## Explanation
This fixes #5284 for the upcoming 0.12 release by cherry-picking #5285
and #5287 into the release branch.

Both cherry-picks happened cleanly, so the review is expected to be
straightforward.

## Essential Checklist
- [ ] ~The PR title and explanation each start with "Fix #bugnum: " (If
this PR fixes part of an issue, prefix the title with "Fix part of
#bugnum: ...".)~
- [x] Any changes to
[scripts/assets](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/tree/develop/scripts/assets)
files have their rationale included in the PR explanation.
- [x] The PR follows the [style
guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Coding-style-guide).
- [x] The PR does not contain any unnecessary code changes from Android
Studio
([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#undo-unnecessary-changes)).
- [x] The PR is made from a branch that's **not** called "develop" and
is up-to-date with "develop".
- [x] The PR is **assigned** to the appropriate reviewers
([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#clarification-regarding-assignees-and-reviewers-section)).

## For UI-specific PRs only
See corresponding cherry-picks and original PRs for references on what
reverted behavior is being checked in within this PR.

---------

Co-authored-by: Adhiambo Peres <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG]: App crashes in production builds
2 participants