zpool status: Fix option string, adding -e and fixing order

[cmharr]

Motivation and Context

Fixes missing zpool status help option and alphabetizes the options

Issue #16004

Description

The recently added '-e' option (PR #15769) missed adding the new option in the online zpool status help command. This adds the option and reorders the 'i' and 'D' options alphabetically.

How Has This Been Tested?

Test new online help menu:
Before:

[root@iron5:zfs2.2]# ./zpool status -h
invalid option 'h'
usage:
	status [--power] [-c [script1,script2,...]] [-igLpPstvxD]  [-T d|u] [pool] ... 
	    [interval [count]]

After:

[root@iron5:zfs2.2]# ./zpool status -h
invalid option 'h'
usage:
	status [--power] [-c [script1,script2,...]] [-DegiLpPstvx]  [-T d|u] [pool] ... 
	    [interval [count]]

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Performance enhancement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
• Code cleanup (non-breaking change which makes code smaller or more readable)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• Library ABI change (libzfs, libzfs_core, libnvpair, libuutil and libzfsbootenv)
• Documentation (a change to man pages or other documentation)

Checklist:

• My code follows the OpenZFS code style requirements.
• [] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• [] I have read the contributing document.
• [] I have added tests to cover my changes.
• [] I have run the ZFS Test Suite with this change applied.
• All commit messages are properly formatted and contain Signed-off-by.

Signed-off-by: Cameron Harr [email protected]

[bwatkinson]

Just a little bit of OCD on my part, but can you also update zpool-status.8 to also have the options list in alphabetical order as well as part of the PR? They are in line 39 of that file.

[cmharr]

@bwatkinson, I think I got all the places in zpool status with the wrong order. Thanks for pointing out where it still needed an edit.

[bwatkinson]

@bwatkinson, I think I got all the places in zpool status with the wrong order. Thanks for pointing out where it still needed an edit.

Cool and thanks. Also can you look into the CI test failures for:

    FAIL cli_root/zpool_status/zpool_status_001_pos (expected PASS)
    FAIL cli_root/zpool_status/zpool_status_002_pos (expected PASS)
    FAIL cli_user/misc/zpool_001_neg (expected PASS)

Those seem to reliably fail with this PR.