Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[zfs-2.1.15] Misc backports #15858

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Feb 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

tonyhutter
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation and Context

Backports to zfs-2.1.15-staging.

Description

Backport some low-risk features and ZTS updates to zfs-2.1.15-staging.

How Has This Been Tested?

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Performance enhancement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
  • Code cleanup (non-breaking change which makes code smaller or more readable)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Library ABI change (libzfs, libzfs_core, libnvpair, libuutil and libzfsbootenv)
  • Documentation (a change to man pages or other documentation)

Checklist:

@robn
Copy link
Member

robn commented Feb 6, 2024

@tonyhutter do you want 6.6/6.7/6.8 compat patches for 2.1.15? I don't mind either way, I don't need them, but I'd be happy to backport them if you want them.

@tonyhutter
Copy link
Contributor Author

@robn thanks, but I don't think we'll need them. We really only build 2.1.x for EL7-9 now.

@rincebrain
Copy link
Contributor

I would personally suggest including the compat patches, not because I particularly plan on using them myself directly, but because it'd be very helpful to be able to keep saying "can you try 2.1.x" a while longer if any more bugs in 2.2.x come up.

I'll also happily do the backports, if need be, I don't think any of them looked exciting, but that's my $0.02.

@tonyhutter
Copy link
Contributor Author

tonyhutter commented Feb 6, 2024

@rincebrain it's ok with me if developers want to backport compat commits into zfs-2.1.15-staging. They can just open a backport PR and we can get them approved pretty quick. Note that we don't build Fedora RPMs for 2.1.x anymore, so those users will need to build from source.

This particular PR is just a backport for some ZED and ZTS commits that I would like to see in zfs-2.1.15-staging.

@m-ueberall
Copy link

m-ueberall commented Feb 7, 2024

@tonyhutter do you want 6.6/6.7/6.8 compat patches for 2.1.15? I don't mind either way, I don't need them, but I'd be happy to backport them if you want them.

Given that kernel 6.6 is a long-term support version, that'd be great! I'd imagine that this would allow a number of people to delay the switch from 2.1.x to 2.2.x if need be.

@AllKind
Copy link
Contributor

AllKind commented Feb 7, 2024

I'd like to propose 9ce567c and 95b68eb again.
Since their inclusion into 2.2+ there have been no new error reports in that regard (except one, which is a follow up problem from the previous code).
Also someone else opened a PR for those already (can't find the now though) and @behlendorf proposed it for this upcoming 2.1 release.

@behlendorf
Copy link
Contributor

@AllKind thanks for the reminder, these have already been included in the staging branch and will be part of 2.1.15.

Have libzfs call a special `zfs_prepare_disk` script before a disk is
included into the pool.  The user can edit this script to add things
like a disk firmware update or a disk health check.  Use of the script
is totally optional. See the zfs_prepare_disk manpage for full details.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#15243
There have been rare cases where the VDEV_ENC_SYSFS_PATH value that zed
gets passed is stale.  To mitigate this, dynamically check the sysfs
path at the time of zed event processing, and use the dynamic value if
possible.  Note that there will be other times when we can not
dynamically detect the sysfs path (like if a disk disappears) and have
to rely on the old value for things like turning on the fault LED.  That
is to say, we can't just blindly use the dynamic path in every case.

Also:
	- Add enclosure sysfs entry when running 'zpool add'
	- Fix 'slot' and 'enc' zpool.d scripts for nvme

Reviewed-by: Don Brady <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#15462
Many tests are failing on AlmaLinux 9 because ZTS could not destroy the
pool in cleanup.  This was due to $PWD being set to '.' instead of the
expected full path.  This patch sets $PWD to the full path.

Signed-off-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Don Brady <[email protected]>
Add a test for the dirty dnode SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA bug described in
openzfs#15526

The bug was fixed in openzfs#15571 and
was backported to 2.2.2 and 2.1.14.  This test case is just to
make sure it does not come back.

seekflood.c originally written by Rob Norris.

Reviewed-by: Graham Perrin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Rob Norris <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#15608
Replace ENCLO_US_RE with ENCLO_SU_RE in the name of the variable.

Note this changes the user-visible string in zed.rc, thus might
break current users with the wrong string, but it's ~2 months
since zfs-2.2.0 tag is out, thus should not be widespread yet.

Mechanical change:

    $ grep -rl ZED_POWER_OFF_ENCLOUSRE_SLOT_ON_FAULT
    cmd/zed/zed.d/zed.rc
    cmd/zed/zed.d/statechange-slot_off.sh

    $ sed -i 's/ZED_POWER_OFF_ENCLOUSRE_SLOT_ON_FAULT/<linebreak>
                ZED_POWER_OFF_ENCLOSURE_SLOT_ON_FAULT/g' \
      cmd/zed/zed.d/zed.rc \
      cmd/zed/zed.d/statechange-slot_off.sh

    $ grep -rl ZED_POWER_OFF_ENCLOUSRE_SLOT_ON_FAULT
    $

Fixes 11fbcac
("zed: Add zedlet to power off slot when drive is faulted")

Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#15651
tonyhutter and others added 4 commits February 8, 2024 14:39
Add `zpool` flags to control the slot power to drives.  This assumes
your SAS or NVMe enclosure supports slot power control via sysfs.

The new `--power` flag is added to `zpool offline|online|clear`:

    zpool offline --power <pool> <device>    Turn off device slot power
    zpool online --power <pool> <device>     Turn on device slot power
    zpool clear --power <pool> [device]      Turn on device slot power

If the ZPOOL_AUTO_POWER_ON_SLOT env var is set, then the '--power'
option is automatically implied for `zpool online` and `zpool clear`
and does not need to be passed.

zpool status also gets a --power option to print the slot power status.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mart Frauenlob <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#15662
When very large pools are present, it can be laborious to find
reasons for why a pool is degraded and/or where an unhealthy vdev
is. This option filters out vdevs that are ONLINE and with no errors
to make it easier to see where the issues are. Root and parents of
unhealthy vdevs will always be printed.

Testing:
ZFS errors and drive failures for multiple vdevs were simulated with
zinject.

Sample vdev listings with '-e' option
- All vdevs healthy
    NAME        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
    iron5       ONLINE       0     0     0

- ZFS errors
    NAME        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
    iron5       ONLINE       0     0     0
      raidz2-5  ONLINE       1     0     0
        L23     ONLINE       1     0     0
        L24     ONLINE       1     0     0
        L37     ONLINE       1     0     0

- Vdev faulted
    NAME        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
    iron5       DEGRADED     0     0     0
      raidz2-6  DEGRADED     0     0     0
        L67     FAULTED      0     0     0  too many errors

- Vdev faults and data errors
    NAME        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
    iron5       DEGRADED     0     0     0
      raidz2-1  DEGRADED     0     0     0
        L2      FAULTED      0     0     0  too many errors
      raidz2-5  ONLINE       1     0     0
        L23     ONLINE       1     0     0
        L24     ONLINE       1     0     0
        L37     ONLINE       1     0     0
      raidz2-6  DEGRADED     0     0     0
        L67     FAULTED      0     0     0  too many errors

- Vdev missing
    NAME        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
    iron5       DEGRADED     0     0     0
      raidz2-6  DEGRADED     0     0     0
        L67     UNAVAIL      3     1     0

- Slow devices when -s provided with -e
    NAME        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM  SLOW
    iron5       DEGRADED     0     0     0     -
      raidz2-5  DEGRADED     0     0     0     -
        L10     FAULTED      0     0     0     0  external device fault
        L51     ONLINE       0     0     0    14

Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Cameron Harr <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#15769
CVE-2020-24370 is a security vulnerability in lua. Although the CVE
description in CVE-2020-24370 said that this CVE only affected lua
5.4.0, according to lua this CVE actually existed since lua 5.2. The
root cause of this CVE is the negation overflow that occurs when you
try to take the negative of 0x80000000. Thus, this CVE also exists in
openzfs. Try to backport the fix to the lua in openzfs since the
original fix is for 5.4 and several functions have been changed.

GHSA-gfr4-c37g-mm3v
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-24370
https://www.lua.org/bugs.html#5.4.0-11
lua/lua@a585eae

Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: ChenHao Lu <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#15847
The zfs_load-key tests were failing on F39 due to their use of the
deprecated ssl.wrap_socket function.  This commit updates the test to
instead use ssl.SSLContext() as described in
https://stackoverflow.com/a/65194957.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#15534
Closes openzfs#15550
Update ABI files from latest CI run results (for zfs-2.1.15)

Signed-off-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
@mmatuska
Copy link
Contributor

mmatuska commented Feb 10, 2024

Please backport 07e95b4 (#15716), it fixes FreeBSD userspace build after #15662
This is the same for 2.1.x as it was for 2.2.x

- Mark some parameters to zpool_power*() as unused.
- Add a stub zpool_disk_wait().

Fixes: a9520e6 ("zpool: Add slot power control, print power status")

Signed-off-by: Mark Johnston <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
@tonyhutter
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mmatuska sorry I missed that one! I included it in my latest push.

@behlendorf behlendorf merged commit 4a0d86a into openzfs:zfs-2.1.15-staging Feb 13, 2024
8 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.