Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add chart material #807

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: refactor/develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hexqi
Copy link
Collaborator

@hexqi hexqi commented Sep 21, 2024

English | 简体中文

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • Built its own designer, fully self-validated

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

Background and solution

改动

1. 添加6个 TinyVue图表组件

image

2. 添加TinyLayout,解决拖入栅格组件,TinyLayout被识别为区块问题

image

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced multiple new chart components: Pie Chart, Line Chart, Histogram, Bar Chart, Radar Chart, and Ring Chart.
    • Added a new "Charts" group to organize and provide example schemas for each chart type, enhancing data visualization capabilities.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce multiple new chart components based on eCharts, including pie, line, histogram, bar, radar, and ring charts. Each component is defined with various properties for configuration and data input. A new "Charts" group is created to organize these components, providing example schemas and sample data for rendering. This update significantly enhances the application's data visualization capabilities.

Changes

Files Change Summary
designer-demo/public/mock/bundle.json Added new components: TinyChartPie, TinyChartLine, TinyChartHistogram, TinyChartBar, TinyChartRadar, TinyChartRing. Added new group: Charts with example schemas.

Poem

In the garden of charts, oh what a sight,
Pie and line dance, oh what delight!
Bar and radar join the fun,
With colors bright, they shine like the sun.
Hooray for data, let’s visualize,
A world of numbers before our eyes! 🐇✨


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a1f3338 and 9240ea1.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • designer-demo/public/mock/bundle.json (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • designer-demo/public/mock/bundle.json

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added enhancement New feature or request refactor-main refactor/develop branch feature labels Sep 21, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
designer-demo/public/mock/bundle.json (2)

Line range hint 4-4: Reminder: Address the TODO comment.

The TODO comment indicates that tests are missing for this function. Please ensure that the function is thoroughly tested to confirm that it behaves as expected.

Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?


Line range hint 12-24: Consider adjusting the fee structure or discount policy.

The implementation of a flat $20 fee on discounted bills could negate the benefit of the discount, especially for smaller purchases or marginal loyalty tiers. This might lead to customer dissatisfaction, as the intent to reward loyalty paradoxically increases the bill.

Consider revising either the discount percentages or the flat fee application to better align with customer incentives.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 80a36d6 and a1f3338.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • designer-demo/public/mock/bundle.json (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
designer-demo/public/mock/bundle.json (2)

Line range hint 1-2: LGTM!

The function logic is correct, and the implementation is accurate.


Line range hint 5-6: LGTM!

The function logic is correct, and the implementation is accurate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request refactor-main refactor/develop branch feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant