Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCM-13259 | ci: Support hosted-cp shared-vpc profile for rosacli ci #2740

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

yuwang-RH
Copy link
Member

@yuwang-RH yuwang-RH commented Jan 3, 2025

OCM-13259 | ci: Support hosted-cp shared-vpc profile for rosacli ci

logs on local: https://privatebin.corp.redhat.com/?1314980f61605055#8vXoQWz7Q4HJMcEhyg7BvyrzeDQYxf8nJc8KPRU4PvHF

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from gdbranco and marcolan018 January 3, 2025 12:46
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 3, 2025
@yuwang-RH
Copy link
Member Author

@jerichokeyne @hunterkepley @den-rgb Could you help review this PR?

@hunterkepley
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, is go mod vendor required here? Just making sure

Looks like the linter found a few lines which are too long, should be easy to fix

Reviewing the non-vendor code now

@hunterkepley
Copy link
Contributor

overall LGTM besides my question about go mod vendor

@yuwang-RH yuwang-RH force-pushed the 0102 branch 2 times, most recently from 30b7596 to e11b890 Compare January 6, 2025 03:04
@yuwang-RH
Copy link
Member Author

@hunterkepley The linter issue has been fixed with my latest commit. About the vendor change, they are from the golang mod as "github.com/openshift-online/ocm-common v0.0.16" we used have some packages version update. Could you help review again then needs your lgtm label. Thanks.

@hunterkepley
Copy link
Contributor

looks like the hosted-cp flag may be missing from cluster creation based on the failing test

once that's fixed i will set to auto merge

@yuwang-RH
Copy link
Member Author

@hunterkepley The failed test is in presubmit pr job which is not related to the new added function in that PR. The failed job is e2e-presubmits-pr-rosa-sts-advanced , a sts advanced cluster, not a hosted-cp cluster
The presubmit job was designed to try to find day-2 issues on all cluster profiles including the new added. Every new PR will trigger some presubmit jobs in cases of any regression issue involved. I will skip that failed job to merge this PR and will fix the issue of the e2e-presubmits-pr-rosa-sts-advanced later.

@yuwang-RH
Copy link
Member Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-presubmits-pr-rosa-sts-advanced

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 7, 2025

@yuwang-RH: Overrode contexts on behalf of yuwang-RH: ci/prow/e2e-presubmits-pr-rosa-sts-advanced

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-presubmits-pr-rosa-sts-advanced

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 29.11%. Comparing base (06c25f5) to head (e89cac8).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2740   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   29.11%   29.11%           
=======================================
  Files         185      185           
  Lines       25805    25805           
=======================================
  Hits         7513     7513           
  Misses      17693    17693           
  Partials      599      599           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@hunterkepley
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 7, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hunterkepley, yuwang-RH

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [hunterkepley,yuwang-RH]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 7, 2025

@yuwang-RH: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit e8ca991 into openshift:master Jan 7, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants