Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-10395: Bump OVN to disable CT flush #1590

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 16, 2023

Conversation

tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

@tssurya tssurya commented Mar 16, 2023

- What this PR does and why is it needed

See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178962#c0 for details.
/cc @jcaamano @dcbw

@dcbw dcbw changed the title Bump OVN to disable CT flush OCPBUGS-10395: Bump OVN to disable CT flush Mar 16, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Mar 16, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tssurya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-10395, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.14.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

- What this PR does and why is it needed

- Special notes for reviewers

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from abhat and dcbw March 16, 2023 16:51
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tssurya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-10395, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.14.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

In response to this:

- What this PR does and why is it needed

See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178962#c0 for details.
/cc @jcaamano @dcbw

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/test images

4 similar comments
@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Mar 16, 2023

/test images

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/test images

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/test images

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/test images

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/approve
/lgtm

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/test images

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 16, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 16, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dcbw, tssurya

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 16, 2023
@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/test images

7 similar comments
@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/test images

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/test images

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/test images

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Mar 16, 2023

/test images

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/test images

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Mar 16, 2023

/test images

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/test images

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/retest

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/payload 4.14 ci blocking

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 16, 2023

@dcbw: trigger 4 job(s) of type blocking for the ci release of OCP 4.14

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.14-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.14-upgrade-from-stable-4.13-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.14-upgrade-from-stable-4.13-e2e-azure-sdn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.14-e2e-aws-sdn-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/a5c32900-c428-11ed-9fce-10e0edea7e32-0

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Mar 16, 2023

Test results from #1588 show success on the same effective change.

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Mar 16, 2023

/test e2e-aws-ovn-shared-to-local-gateway-mode-migration

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 6b3b4b7 and 2 for PR HEAD 5968690 in total

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-shared-to-local-gateway-mode-migration

Failure is a systemd cgroup timeout on teardown of KCM pod that overruns the 3m timeout the test allows for the new one to start; but the new one can't start until the old one is gone, which is blocked on the systemd/cgroup thing which runs out the clock.

Mar 16 19:24:22.829206 ip-10-0-169-208 kubenswrapper[2127]: E0316 19:24:22.828926    2127 pod_workers.go:965] "Error syncing pod, skipping" err="failed to delete cgroup paths for [kubepods burstable pod6b0fab377a7eda095957f37ba27eecb2] : unable to destroy cgroup paths for cgroup [kubepods burstable pod6b0fab377a7eda095957f37ba27eecb2] : Timed out while waiting for systemd to remove kubepods-burstable-pod6b0fab377a7eda095957f37ba27eecb2.slice" pod="openshift-kube-controller-manager/kube-controller-manager-ip-10-0-169-208.ec2.internal" podUID=6b0fab377a7eda095957f37ba27eecb2

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 16, 2023

@dcbw: Overrode contexts on behalf of dcbw: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-shared-to-local-gateway-mode-migration

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-shared-to-local-gateway-mode-migration

Failure is a systemd cgroup timeout on teardown of KCM pod that overruns the 3m timeout the test allows for the new one to start; but the new one can't start until the old one is gone, which is blocked on the systemd/cgroup thing which runs out the clock.

Mar 16 19:24:22.829206 ip-10-0-169-208 kubenswrapper[2127]: E0316 19:24:22.828926    2127 pod_workers.go:965] "Error syncing pod, skipping" err="failed to delete cgroup paths for [kubepods burstable pod6b0fab377a7eda095957f37ba27eecb2] : unable to destroy cgroup paths for cgroup [kubepods burstable pod6b0fab377a7eda095957f37ba27eecb2] : Timed out while waiting for systemd to remove kubepods-burstable-pod6b0fab377a7eda095957f37ba27eecb2.slice" pod="openshift-kube-controller-manager/kube-controller-manager-ip-10-0-169-208.ec2.internal" podUID=6b0fab377a7eda095957f37ba27eecb2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn

level=error msg=Error: failed to parse ovf: failed to parse ovf: XML syntax error on line 1: illegal character code U+0000
level=error
level=error msg=  with vsphereprivate_import_ova.import[0],
level=error msg=  on main.tf line 70, in resource "vsphereprivate_import_ova" "import":
level=error msg=  70: resource "vsphereprivate_import_ova" "import" {
level=error
level=error msg=failed to fetch Cluster: failed to generate asset "Cluster": failure applying terraform for "pre-bootstrap" stage: failed to create cluster: failed to apply Terraform: exit status 1
level=error
level=error msg=Error: failed to parse ovf: failed to parse ovf: XML syntax error on line 1: illegal character code U+0000
level=error
level=error msg=  with vsphereprivate_import_ova.import[0],
level=error msg=  on main.tf line 70, in resource "vsphereprivate_import_ova" "import":
level=error msg=  70: resource "vsphereprivate_import_ova" "import" {

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 16, 2023

@dcbw: Overrode contexts on behalf of dcbw: ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn

level=error msg=Error: failed to parse ovf: failed to parse ovf: XML syntax error on line 1: illegal character code U+0000
level=error
level=error msg=  with vsphereprivate_import_ova.import[0],
level=error msg=  on main.tf line 70, in resource "vsphereprivate_import_ova" "import":
level=error msg=  70: resource "vsphereprivate_import_ova" "import" {
level=error
level=error msg=failed to fetch Cluster: failed to generate asset "Cluster": failure applying terraform for "pre-bootstrap" stage: failed to create cluster: failed to apply Terraform: exit status 1
level=error
level=error msg=Error: failed to parse ovf: failed to parse ovf: XML syntax error on line 1: illegal character code U+0000
level=error
level=error msg=  with vsphereprivate_import_ova.import[0],
level=error msg=  on main.tf line 70, in resource "vsphereprivate_import_ova" "import":
level=error msg=  70: resource "vsphereprivate_import_ova" "import" {

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-windows

Windows job just took forever to install...

level=info msg=Waiting up to 40m0s (until 9:37PM) for the cluster at https://api.ci-op-1y4v0nx6-f5adf.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443 to initialize...
{"component":"entrypoint","file":"k8s.io/test-infra/prow/entrypoint/run.go:164","func":"k8s.io/test-infra/prow/entrypoint.Options.ExecuteProcess","level":"error","msg":"Process did not finish before 2h0m0s timeout","severity":"error","time":"2023-03-16T21:03:07Z"}
Setup phase finished, prepare env for next steps

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 16, 2023

@dcbw: Overrode contexts on behalf of dcbw: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-windows

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-windows

Windows job just took forever to install...

level=info msg=Waiting up to 40m0s (until 9:37PM) for the cluster at https://api.ci-op-1y4v0nx6-f5adf.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443 to initialize...
{"component":"entrypoint","file":"k8s.io/test-infra/prow/entrypoint/run.go:164","func":"k8s.io/test-infra/prow/entrypoint.Options.ExecuteProcess","level":"error","msg":"Process did not finish before 2h0m0s timeout","severity":"error","time":"2023-03-16T21:03:07Z"}
Setup phase finished, prepare env for next steps

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-windows

Windows job just took forever to install...

level=info msg=Waiting up to 40m0s (until 9:37PM) for the cluster at https://api.ci-op-1y4v0nx6-f5adf.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443 to initialize...
{"component":"entrypoint","file":"k8s.io/test-infra/prow/entrypoint/run.go:164","func":"k8s.io/test-infra/prow/entrypoint.Options.ExecuteProcess","level":"error","msg":"Process did not finish before 2h0m0s timeout","severity":"error","time":"2023-03-16T21:03:07Z"}
Setup phase finished, prepare env for next steps

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 16, 2023

@dcbw: Overrode contexts on behalf of dcbw: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-windows

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-windows

Windows job just took forever to install...

level=info msg=Waiting up to 40m0s (until 9:37PM) for the cluster at https://api.ci-op-1y4v0nx6-f5adf.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443 to initialize...
{"component":"entrypoint","file":"k8s.io/test-infra/prow/entrypoint/run.go:164","func":"k8s.io/test-infra/prow/entrypoint.Options.ExecuteProcess","level":"error","msg":"Process did not finish before 2h0m0s timeout","severity":"error","time":"2023-03-16T21:03:07Z"}
Setup phase finished, prepare env for next steps

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/override ci/prow/4.13-upgrade-from-stable-4.12-local-gateway-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
/override ci/prow/4.13-upgrade-from-stable-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

These jobs don't actually test anything in this PR because they aren't testing 4.14 at all. We are working on bumping them but for now the results are useless.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 16, 2023

@dcbw: Overrode contexts on behalf of dcbw: ci/prow/4.13-upgrade-from-stable-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade, ci/prow/4.13-upgrade-from-stable-4.12-local-gateway-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/4.13-upgrade-from-stable-4.12-local-gateway-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
/override ci/prow/4.13-upgrade-from-stable-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

These jobs don't actually test anything in this PR because they aren't testing 4.14 at all. We are working on bumping them but for now the results are useless.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-local-gateway

While these jobs failed, we do not see the markers of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-10395

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 16, 2023

@dcbw: Overrode contexts on behalf of dcbw: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade, ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-local-gateway

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-local-gateway

While these jobs failed, we do not see the markers of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-10395

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 16, 2023

/tide refresh

@dcbw dcbw merged commit 5cfa88c into openshift:master Mar 16, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tssurya: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-10395: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-10395 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

- What this PR does and why is it needed

See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178962#c0 for details.
/cc @jcaamano @dcbw

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dcbw
Copy link
Contributor

dcbw commented Mar 17, 2023

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@dcbw: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-10395: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-10395 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants